Skip to main content
Log in

Properties of the optimal trajectories for coplanar, aeroassisted orbital transfer

  • Contributed Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the optimization of trajectories for coplanar, aeroassisted orbital transfer (AOT) from a high Earth orbit (HEO) to a low Earth orbit (LEO). In particular, HEO can be a geosynchronous Earth orbit (GEO). It is assumed that the initial and final orbits are circular, that the gravitational field is central and is governed by the inverse square law, and that two impulses are employed, one at HEO exit and one at LEO entry. During the atmospheric pass, the trajectory is controlled via the lift coefficient in such a way that the total characteristic velocity is minimized.

First, an ideal optimal trajectory is determined analytically for lift coefficient unbounded. This trajectory is called grazing trajectory, because the atmospheric pass is made by flying at constant altitude along the edge of the atmosphere until the excess velocity is depleted. For the grazing trajectory, the lift coefficient varies in such a way that the lift, the centrifugal force due to the Earth's curvature, the weight, and the Coriolis force due to the Earth's rotation are in static balance. Also, the grazing trajectory minimizes the total characteristic velocity and simultaneously nearly minimizes the peak values of the altitude drop, the dynamic pressure, and the heating rate.

Next, starting from the grazing trajectory results, a real optimal trajectory is determined numerically for lift coefficient bounded from both below and above. This trajectory is characterized by atmospheric penetration with the smallest possible entry angle, followed by flight at the lift coefficient lower bound. Consistently with the grazing trajectory behavior, the real optimal trajectory minimizes the total characteristic velocity and simultaneously nearly minimizes the peak values of the altitude drop, the dynamic pressure, and the heating rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

C D :

drag coefficient

C L :

lift coefficient

D :

drag, N

DP:

dynamic pressure, N/m2

E :

lift-to-drag ratio modulus

g :

local acceleration of gravity, m/sec2

g a :

acceleration of gravity ath=h a , m/sec2

h :

altitude, m

h a :

thickness of the atmosphere, m

HR:

heating rate, W/m2

L :

lift, N

m :

mass, kg

r :

radial distance from the center of the Earth, m

r a :

radius of the outer edge of the atmosphere, m

r e :

radius of the Earth, m

S :

reference surface area, m2

t :

T/τ=dimensionless time

T :

running time, sec

V :

velocity, m/sec

V a :

circular velocity atr=r a , m/sec

V * :

reference velocity, m/sec

γ :

path inclination, rad

μ :

Earth's gravitational constant, m3/sec2

ρ :

air density, kg/m3

ρ a :

air density ath=h a , kg/m3

ρ * :

reference air density, kg/m3

τ :

final time, sec

θ :

Earth's angular velocity, rad/sec

ΔV :

characteristic velocity, m/sec

0:

entry into the atmosphere

1:

exit from the atmosphere

00:

exit from the initial orbit

11:

entry into the final orbit.

•:

derivative with respect to dimensionless time

∼:

variable computed in an inertial system.

AOT:

aeroassisted orbital transfer

GEO:

geosynchronous Earth orbit

HEO:

high Earth orbit

LEO:

low Earth orbit

SGRA:

sequential gradient-restoration algorithm

TPBVP:

two-point boundary-value problem

References

  1. Boston, P. J., Editor,The Case for Mars, Univelt, San Diego, California, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Reiber, D. B., Editor,The NASA Mars Conference, Univelt, San Diego, California, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rea, D. G., Craig, M. K., Cunningham, G. E., andConway, H. L.,An International Mars Exploration Program, Acta Astronautica, Vol. 22, Nos. 1–12, pp. 255–267, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mease, K. D., andVinh, N. X.,Minimum-Fuel Aeroassisted Coplanar Orbit Transfer Using Lift Modulation, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 134–141, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Miele, A., andVenkataraman, P.,Optimal Trajectories for Aeroassisted Orbital Transfer, Acta Astronautica, Vol. 11, Nos. 7–8, pp. 423–433, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Miele, A., andBasapur, V. K.,Approximate Solutions to Minimax Optimal Control Problems for Aeroassisted Orbital Transfer, Acta Astronautica, Vol. 12, No. 10, pp. 809–818, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Miele, A., Basapur, V. K., andMease, K. D.,Nearly-Grazing Optimal Trajectories for Aeroassisted Orbital Transfer, Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 3–18, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Miele, A., Basapur, V. K., andLee, W. Y.,Optimal Trajectories for Aeroassisted, Coplanar Orbital Transfer, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 1–24, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vinh, N. X., Johannesen, J. R., Mease, K. D., andHanson, J. M.,Explicit Guidance of Drag-Modulated Aeroassisted Transfer between Elliptical Orbits, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 274–280, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lee, B. S., andGrantham, W. J.,Aeroassisted Orbital Maneuvering Using Lyapunov Optimal Feedback Control, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 237–242, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Anonymous, N. N.,Aeroassisted Flight Experiment: Preliminary Design Document, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, 1986.

  12. Gamble, J. D., Cerimele, C. J., Moore, T. E., andHiggins, J.,Atmospheric Guidance Concepts for an Aeroassist Flight Experiment, Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 36, Nos. 1–2, pp. 45–71, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Miele, A., Wang, T., andLee, W. Y.,Optimization and Guidance of Trajectories for Coplanar, Aeroassisted Orbital Transfer, Rice University, Aero-Astronautics Report No. 241, 1989.

  14. Miele, A., andWang, T.,Gamma Guidance of Trajectories for Coplanar, Aeroassisted Orbital Transfer, Rice University, Aero-Astronautics Report No. 246, 1990.

  15. NOAA, NASA, and USAF,US Standard Atmosphere, 1976, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Miele, A., Wang, T., andBasapur, V. K.,Primal and Dual Formulations of Sequential Gradient-Restoration Algorithms for Trajectory Optimization Problems, Acta Astronautica, Vol. 13, No. 8, pp. 491–505, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Miele, A., andWang, T.,Primal-Dual Properties of Sequential Gradient-Restoration Algorithms for Optimal Control Problems, Part 1: Basic Problem, Integral Methods in Science and Engineering, Edited by F. R. Payne et al., Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Washington, DC, pp. 577–607, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Miele, A., andWang, T.,Primal-Dual Properties of Sequential Gradient-Restoration Algorithms for Optimal Control Problems, Part 2: General Problem, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Vol. 119, Nos. 1–2, pp. 21–54, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Grant No. NAG-8-820, by Jet Propulsion Laboratory Contract No. 956415, and by Texas Advanced Technology Program Grant No. TATP-003604020.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miele, A., Wang, T. & Deaton, A.W. Properties of the optimal trajectories for coplanar, aeroassisted orbital transfer. J Optim Theory Appl 69, 1–30 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00940459

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00940459

Key Words

Navigation