Skip to main content
Log in

Characterizing the nondominated set by separable functions

  • Contributed Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present sufficient and necessary conditions for classes of separable (additive) functions to generate the set of nondominated outcomes in multicriteria optimization problems. The basic technique consists of convexifying the set of outcomes and then applying the standard characterization of a convex set by a class of linear functions. The conditions include the case when the set of feasible alternatives is convex and the criteria are convex-transformable. We show that the sum of powers and the sum of functions of exponents can generate the nondominated set for an arbitrary set of outcomes (under compactness conditions). We also discuss monotonicity, proper nondominance, uniqueness and connectedness of solutions, and weights and trade-offs with respect to these functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yu, P. L.,Cone Convexity, Cone Extreme Points, and Nondominated Solutions in Decision Problems with Multiobjectives, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 14, pp. 319–377, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Henig, M. I.,Proper Efficiency with Respect to Cones, Journal of Optimization and Applications, Vol. 36, pp. 387–407, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Benson, B.,An Improved Definition of Proper Efficiency for Vector Maximization with Respect to Cones, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Vol. 71, pp. 232–241, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arrow, K. J., Barankin, E. W., andBlackwell, D.,Admissible Points of Convex Sets, Contribution to the Theory of Games, Edited by H. W. Kuhn and A. W. Tucker, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, pp. 87–91, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Geoffrion, A. M.,Proper Efficiency and the Theory of Vector Maximization, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Vol. 22, pp. 613–630, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yu, P. L.,A Class of Solutions for Group Decision Problems, Management Science, Vol. 19, pp. 936–946, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zeleny, M.,Compromise Programming, Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Edited by J. L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, South Carolina, pp. 373–391, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yu, P. L., andLeitmann, G.,Compromise Solution, Domination Structures, and Salukvadze's Solution, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 13, pp. 362–378, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Salukvadze, M. E.,Optimization of Vector Functionals, Automatika i Telemenkhanika, pp. 5–15, 1971 (in Russian).

  10. Huang, S. C.,Note on the Mean-Square Strategy of Vector-Valued Objective Function, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 9, pp. 364–366, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bowman, V. J.,On the Relationship of the Tchebycheff Norm and the Efficient Frontier of Multiple-Criteria Objectives, Multiple-Criteria Decision Making, Edited by H. Thiriez and S. Zionts, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 76–85, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Haimes, Y. Y., Lasdon, L., andWismer, D.,On a Bicriterion Formulation of the Problems of Integrated Systems Identification and System Optimization, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. SMC-1, pp. 296–297, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hocking, R. R., andShepard, R. L.,Parametric Solution of a Class of Nonconvex Program, Operations Research, Vol. 19, pp. 1742–1747, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Benson, H. P.,Vector Maximization with Two Objectives Functions, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 28, pp. 253–257, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wierzbicki, A. P.,A Mathematical Basis for Satisficing Decision Making, Organizations: Multiple Agents with Multiple Criteria, Edited by J. N. Morse, Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, pp. 465–485, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gearhart, W. B.,Compromise Solutions and Estimation of the Noninferior Set, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 28, pp. 29–47, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jahn, J.,Scalarization in Vector Optimization, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 29, pp. 203–218, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jahn, J.,Some Characterizations of the Optimal Solutions of a Vector Optimization Problem, OR Spektrum, Vol. 7, pp. 7–17, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gearhart, W. B.,Characterization of Properly Efficient Solutions by Generalized Scalarization Methods, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 41, pp. 491–502, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Avriel, M., andZang, I.,Generalized Convex Functions with Applications to Nonlinear Programming, Mathematical Programs for Activity Analysis, Edited by P. Van Moeseke, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Chapter 2, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hartley, R.,On Cone-Efficiency, Cone-Convexity, and Cone-Compactness, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, Vol. 34, pp. 211–222, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Borwein, J.,Proper Efficient Points for Maximizations with Respect to Cones, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, Vol. 15, pp. 57–63, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rockafellar, R. T.,Convex Analysis, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Soland, R. M.,Multicriteria Optimization: A General Characterization of Efficient Solutions, Decision Sciences, Vol. 10, pp. 26–38, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Avriel, M.,Nonlinear Programming: Analysis and Methods, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliff, New Jersey, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Naccache, P. H.,Connectedness of the Set of Nondominated Outcomes in Multicriteria Optimization, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 25, pp. 459–467, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Warburton, A. R.,Quasiconcave Vector Maximization: Connectedness of the Sets of Pareto-Optimal and Weak Pareto-Optimal Alternatives, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 40, pp. 537–557, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chankong, V., andHaimes, Y. Y.,Multiobjective Decision Making: Theory and Methodology, North-Holland, New York, New York, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by M. A. Avriel

The research was done while the author was Visiting Professor at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois. The author is grateful to G. Hazen, Northwestern University, for helpful discussions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Henig, M.I. Characterizing the nondominated set by separable functions. J Optim Theory Appl 59, 423–444 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00940308

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00940308

Key Words

Navigation