Skip to main content
Log in

Relationships ofLomatium among other genera ofApiaceae

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lomatium is the largest North American genus ofApiaceae (=Umbelliferae). Relations amongLomatium and other genera have not been well understood. TheApiaceae-Araliaceae lineage and genera of North AmericanApiaceae were analyzed phenetically and cladistically in turn, and seven phenetic alliances of genera are identified. Data on frequencies of character-state combinations were assembled and usingSporne's notions of maximal and minimal co-variation of states, two character-states were identified that are derived among Umbellifer genera. Using cladistic analysis of the alliance consisting ofLomatium and six other genera we identified three sister groups toLomatium:Polytaenia alone;Polytaenia withPseudocymopterus, and a group of four genera. Not all genera in the group of seven withLomatium are supported by autapomorphies impeding phylogenetic reconstructions. Both phenetics and cladistics have helped to suggest and evaluate relationships; to call attention to groups requiring further study, and in particular to identify derived character-states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bessey, C. E., 1915: The phylogenetic taxonomy of flowering plants. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.2, 109–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, E. A. K., Donoghue, M. J., McGinley, R. J., 1981: Characters, computers and cladograms: A review of the Berkeley cladistics workshop. — Syst. Bot.6, 359–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, J., Rose, J., 1888: North AmericanUmbelliferae. — Wabash College, Crawfordsville, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A., 1981: An Integrated System of Classifications of Flowering Plants. — New York: Columbia Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P., Heywood, V., 1973: Principles of Plant Taxonomy. — Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engler, A., Prantl, K., 1887–1915: Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. 23 vols. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farris, S., 1970: Methods for computing Wagner trees. — Syst. Zool.19, 83–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1982: Outgroups and parsimony. — Syst. Zool.31, 328–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmartin, A. J., 1980: Variations within populations and classification. II. Patterns of variation withinAslepiaceae andUmbelliferae. — Taxon29 (2/3), 199–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, W., 1966: Phylogenetic Systematics. — Urbana: Univ. Ill. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, V., 1983: The mythology of taxonomy. — Trans. Bot. Soc. Edinburgh44, 79–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J., 1967: The Genera of Flowering Plants. Vol. II. — Oxford: The Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluge, A., Farris, J. S., 1969: Quantitative phyletics and the evaluation of anurans. — Syst. Zool.18, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madison, W. P., Donoghue, M. J., Madison, D. R., 1984: Outgroup analysis and parsimony. — Syst. Zool.33, 83–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathias, M., Constance, L., 1945:Umbelliferae. — North America Flora28, 161–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendle, A. B., 1930: The Classification of Flowering Plants,1, Gymnosperms and Monocotyledons. — Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1938: The Classifications of Flowering Plants2, Dicotyledons. — Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shishkin, B. K., 1973, 1974:Umbelliflorae. — Flora of the U.S.S.R.16, 17, translated byR. Lavoott. — Jerusalem: Keter Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, K. S., 1985: Systematic studies inLomatium. — Doctoral dissertation, WSU. 228 pp.

  • —, Gilmartin, A. J., 1983: Phylogenetic analysis inUmbelliferae. — Abs. Bot. Soc. Amer.70 (5), II, 115–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sporne, K., 1977: Some problems associated with character correlations. — Pl. Syst. Evol. Suppl.1, 33–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, P. F., 1980: Evolutionary polarity of character-states. — Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst.11, 333–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford, D. L., 1983: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (PAUP) Computer Program. — Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, R., 1976: A phylogenetic classifications of theAngiospermae. — InHecht & al., (Eds.): Evolutionary Biology, pp. 35–106. — New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tutin, T. G., Heywood, V. H., Burges, N. A., Morre, D. M., Valentine, D. H., Walters, S. M., Webb, D. A., (Eds.), 1968: Flora Europaea2.Rosaceae toUmbelliferae. — Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, S. M., 1961: The shaping of angiosperm taxonomy. — New Phytol.60, 74–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watrous, L., Wheeler, Q. D., 1981: The out-group comparison method of character-analysis. — Syst. Zool.30, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilmartin, A.J., Simmons, K.S. Relationships ofLomatium among other genera ofApiaceae . Pl Syst Evol 157, 95–103 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00939184

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00939184

Key words

Navigation