Skip to main content
Log in

Box-Jenkins Methoden — Alternative Verfahren zur Prognose ökonomischer Zeitreihen

  • Published:
Empirica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In this paper we try to clarify whether the use ofBox-Jenkins methods would have improved the forecasting performance in Austria during the recession of 1975. For this purpose we estimate ARIMA models for gross national product, private consumption, investment in plant and equipment, and inventory investment. We then compare the forecasts derived from these models with the results of more convential forecasting techniques. It can not be expected that Box-Jenkins methods predict a business cycle turning point. But, as soon as the recession was under way Box-Jenkins methods were faster in adapting to the new situation than conventional forecasting techniques. We found that the accuracy of Box-Jenkins predictions depends to a large extent on the length of the forecasting horizon. Our results suggest that the forecasting horizon should not exceed one year. All in all, Box-Jenkins methods applied together with the forecasting techniques already in use could further improve the forecasting performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ledolter, J., Schebeck, F. & Thury, G. Box-Jenkins Methoden — Alternative Verfahren zur Prognose ökonomischer Zeitreihen. Empirica 4, 25–55 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00928961

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00928961

Navigation