Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Central function and visual field damage in glaucoma

  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

82 eyes of 82 patients with different types of glaucoma were examined with various psychophysical tests assessing central and paracentral function, including foveal temporal contrast sensitivity function, FM 100-Hue test, and foveal and parafoveal blue-on-yellow-sensitivity. For all eyes visual field tests were performed with the Humphrey-Field-Analyzer, program 30-2. Global visual field indices were calculated as follows: Mean Sensitivity MS, Mean Deviation MD, and Corrected Pattern Standard Deviation CPSD. Linear regression analysis and multiple regression analysis correcting for a possible influence of age between the central and paracentral criteria and the global indices was performed. For the entire study population highly significant correlations are present between foveal and parafoveal blue-on-yellow-sensitivity and MS, MD and CPSD. Whereas in the Normal Tension Glaucoma subgroup (19/82 eyes) no significant correlations are found, the subgroup of 35/82 eyes with markedly elevated intraocular pressure (≥30mmHg) shows highly statistically significant correlations between the low- and high-frequency end of the foveal temporal contrast sensitivity function and foveal and parafoveal blue-on-yellow-sensitivity and the global field indices. The results of the present study support the idea that there are two different mechanisms of glaucomatous damage, one which is pressure-dependent and one which may be pressure-independent. The pressuredependent mechanism is responsible for deficits of central or paracentral function which are correlated to overall visual field damage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams AJ, Heron G, Husted R. Clinical measures of central vision function in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Arch Ophthalmol 1987; 105: 782–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arden GB, Jacobson JJ. A simple grating test for contrast sensitivity: preliminary results indicate value in screening for glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1978; 17: 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hitchings RA, Powell DJ, Arden GB, Carter RM. Contrast sensitivity gratings in glaucoma family screening. Br J Ophthalmol 1981; 65: 515–7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Phelps CD, Motolko MA. Contrast sensitivity and glaucoma. In: Krieglstein GK, Leydhecker W, editors. Glaucoma update II. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York-Tokyo: Springer, 1983: 103–5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Atkin A, Bodis-Wollner I, Podos SM et al. Flicker threshold and pattern VEP latency in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1983; 24: 1524–8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Holopigian K, Sciple W, Mayron C et al. Electrophysiological and psychophysical flicker sensitivity in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990; 31: 1863–8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lachenmayr B, Rothbächer H, Gleissner M. Sinnesphysiologische Untersuchungen bei Glaukom. Fortschr Ophthalmol 1988; 85: 756–62.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ross JE, Bron AJ, Clarke DD. Contrast sensitivity and visual disability in chronic simple glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1984; 68: 821–7.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hyvärinen L, Rovamo J, Laurinen P et al. Contrast sensitivity in monocular glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol 1983; 61: 742–50.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Silverman SE, Gary LT, Hart WM. Motion perception is abnormal in primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990; 31: 722–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Adams AJ, Rodic R, Husted R, Stamper R. Spectral sensitivity and color discrimination changes in glaucoma and glaucoma-suspect patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1982; 23: 516–24.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Drance SM, Lakowski R, Schulzer M, Douglas GR. Acquired color vision changes in glaucoma. Use of 100-Hue Test and Pickford anomaloscope as predictors of glaucomatous field change. Arch Ophthalmol 1981; 99: 829–31.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Flammer J, Drance SM. Correlation between color vision scores and quantitative perimetry in suspected glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1984; 102: 38–9.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Poinoosawmy D, Nagasubramanian S, Gloster J. Colour vision in patients with chronic simple glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol 1980; 64: 852–7.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sample PA, Weinreb RN, Boynton RM. Acquired dyschromatopsia in glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol 1986; 31: 54–64.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bielik M, Zwas F, Shin DH, Tsai CS. PERG and spectral sensitivity in ocular hypertensive and chronic open-angle glaucoma patients. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1991; 229: 401–5.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lachenmayr B, Drance S. Diffuse field loss and central visual function in glaucoma. German J Ophthalmology 1992; 1: 67–73.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J. A package for the statistical analysis of visual fields. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 1987; 49: 153–68.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lachenmayr B. Analyse der zeitlich-räumlichen Übertragungseigenschaften der visuellen Systems — Ein neuer Weg zur Frühdiagnose von Netzhaut- und Sehnerverkrankungen? Thesis, Medical Faculty, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lachenmayr B, Rothbächer H, Gleissner M. Automated flicker perimetry versus quantitative static perimetry in early glaucoma. In: Heijl A, editor. Perimetry Update 1988/89. Proceedings of the VIIIth International Perimetric Society Meeting Vancouver 1988. Amsterdam-Berkeley-Milano: Kugler & Ghedini, 1989; 359–68.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lachenmayr BJ, Drance SM, Chauhan BC et al. Diffuse and localized glaucomatous field loss in light-sense, flicker and resolution perimetry. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1991; 229: 267–73.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Drance SM. The glaucoma visual field defect and its progression. In: Drance SM, Anderson D, editors. Automatic perimetry in glaucoma. A practical guide. Orlando: Grune & Stratton, 1985: 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Flammer J. Psychophysics in glaucoma. A modified concept of the disease. In: Greve EL, Leydhecker W, Raitta C, editors. The second European glaucoma symposium. Dordrecht: Junk Publishers, 1985: 11–7.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Johnson CA, Casson EJ, Adams AJ, Shapiro LR, Brandt JD. Progression of glaucomatous visual field loss over five years: a comparison of white-on-white and blue-on-yellow-perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992; 33: 1384.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Bernhard J. Lachenmayr

    Present address: University Eye Hospital, Mathildenstr. 8, D-8000, Munich 2, Germany

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

    Bernhard J. Lachenmayr & Stephen M. Drance

Authors
  1. Bernhard J. Lachenmayr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stephen M. Drance
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lachenmayr, B.J., Drance, S.M. Central function and visual field damage in glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol 16, 203–209 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00917962

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00917962

Key words

Search

Navigation