Skip to main content
Log in

Characteristics of useful evaluation data: An example from community mental health centers

  • Published:
American Journal of Community Psychology

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Alkin, M. C., Daillak, R., & White, P. (1979).Using evaluations: Does evaluation make a difference? Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attkisson, C. C., Brown, T. R., & Hargreaves, W. A. (1978). Roles and functions of evaluation in human service programs. In C. C. Attkisson, W. A. Hargreaves, M. J. Horowitz, & J. E. Sorensen (Eds.),Evaluation of human service programs (pp. 59–95). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attkisson, C. C., McIntyre, M., Hargreaves, W. A., Harris, M. R., & Ochberg, F. M. (1974). A working model of mental health program evaluation.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 44(5), 741–753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, F. (1982). Effects of value systems on service delivery. In H. C. Schulberg & M. Killilea (Eds.),The modern practice of community mental health (pp. 246–264). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow, D. A., & Ciarlo, J. A. (1976). The impact of therapeutic effectiveness data on community mental health center management. In G. V. Glass (Ed.),Evaluation Studies Review Annual. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broskowski, A. (1982). Leading and managing mental health centers. In H. C. Schulberg & M. Killilea (Eds.),The modern practice of community mental health (pp. 265–288). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner, R. F. (1980). Ethical issues in the use of control groups.New Directions for Program Evaluation, No. 7, 63–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. D., & Shadish, W. R. (1982). Metaevaluation: An assessment of the congressionally mandated evaluation system for community mental health centers. In G. J. Stahler & W. R. Tash (Eds.),Innovative approaches to mental health evaluation (pp. 221–253). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, G. B. (1977). Managerial style: Implications for the utilization of program evaluation information.Evaluation Quarterly, 1, 499–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, G. B., & Osborne, P. S. (1980). Problem characterisitcs, decision processes and evaluation activity: A preliminary study of mental health center directors.Evaluation and Program Planning, 3, 175–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flaherty, E. W., & Olsen, C. (1978).An assessment of the utility of federally required program evaluation in community mental health centers. Springfield, VA: Contract report by the Philadelphia Health Management Corporation to the National Institute of Mental Health. (NTIS; Acquisition No. PB 80207327).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, E. M., & Kirkhart, K. E. (1982).Descriptive analysis of preassessment data (HIRI Tech. Rep.). Austin: Human Interaction Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenwick, D. S. (1979). The role and definition of community psychology.American Psychologist, 34, 559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, M. L. (1982).Utilization of program evaluation in decision making at community mental health centers. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas.

  • Goodstein, L. D., & Sandler, I. (1978). Using psychology to promote human welfare: A conceptual analysis of the role of community psychology.American Psychologist, 33, 882–892.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkhart, K. E. (1979).Program evaluation in community mental health centers. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Michigan.

  • Lounsbury, J. W., Cook, M. P., Leader, D. S., Rubeiz, G., & Meares, E. P. (1979). Community psychology: Boundary problems, psychological perspectives, and an empirical overview of the field.American Psychologist, 34, 554–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majchrzak, A., & Windle, C. (1980). Patterns of program evaluation in community mental health centers.Evaluation Review, 4, 677–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClure, L., Cannon, D., Allen, S., Belton, E., Connor, P., D'Ascoli, C., Stone, P., Sullivan, B., & McClure, G. (1980). Community psychology concepts and research base: Promise and product.American Psychologist, 35, 1000–1011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neigher, W., Ciarlo, J., Hoven, C., Kirkhart, K. E., Landsberg, G., Light, E., Newman, F., Struening, E., Williams, L., Windle, C., & Woy, J. R. (1982). Evaluation policies in the CMHC program: A bold new reproach?Evaluation and Program Planning, 5(4), 283–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • ba]Rappaport, J. (1977).Community psychology: Values, research and action. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, I., & Goodstein, L. D. (1979). Social planning and social action do involve psychological processes.American Psychologist, 34, 557–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulberg, H. C. (1982). Evaluating community mental health programs. In H. C. Schulberg & M. Killilea (Eds.),The modern practice of community mental health (pp. 514–539). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. L. (1981). The certainty of judgments in health evaluation.Evaluation and Program Planning, 4, 273–278.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The study upon which this article is based was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health through a grant to the Human Interaction Research Institute (Grant No. R01 MH 33540, Edward M. Glaser and Karen E. Kirkhart, Co-principal Investigators).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kirkhart, K.E., Attkisson, C.C. Characteristics of useful evaluation data: An example from community mental health centers. Am J Commun Psychol 14, 323–338 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00911178

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00911178

Keywords

Navigation