Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of selected immunoregulatory agents on low-grade contact sensitivity

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Inflammation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of selected compounds with known immunoregulatory activity was examined in a 45-h sensitization period oxazolone contact-sensitivity reaction. Oxazolone sensitivity was induced by applying 0.1 ml of 5% oxazolone in absolute ethanol to the shaved abdomen of C57B1/6 mice on day 0. Challenge with oxazolone followed 45 h later and was accomplished by painting a 5% solution of oxazolone in absolute ethanol on the left hindpaw. The response at 24 h was determined plethysmographically. Histamine (0.062–1.0 mg/kg, subcutaneously, twice a day), concanavalin A (0.31–5.0 mg/kg, intravenously), penicillamine (6.25–25 mg/kg, subcutaneously), chloroquine (6.25– 25 mg/kg, subcutaneously), and thymosin fraction 5 (0.125–1.25 mg/kg subcutaneously) all stimulated the oxazolone reaction when administered on day 0. These data suggest that the low-grade oxazolone response may be a useful assay to detect immunostimulatory activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asherton, G. L., andW. Ptak. 1968. Contact hypersensitivity in the mouse: I. Active sensitization and passive transfer.Immunology 15:405.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davies, A. J. S., R. L. Carter, E. Leuchars, andV. Wallis. 1969. The morphology of immune reactions in normal, thymectomized and reconstituted mice: II. The response to oxazolone.Immunology 17:111.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dietrich, F. M., andR. Hess. 1970. Hypersensitivity inmice: I. Induction of contact sensitivity to oxazolone and inhibition by various chemical compounds.Int. Arch Allergy 38:246.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pritchard, H., andH. S. Michlen. 1972. Immune response in congenitally thymusless mice: I. Absence of response to oxazolone.Clin. Exp. Immunol. 10:151.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Asherson, G. L., andM. Zembala. 1976. Suppressor T-cells in cell-mediated immunity.Br. Med. Bull 32:158.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Askenase, P. W., andB. J. Hayden. 1974. Cytophilic antibodies in mice contact-sensitized with oxazolone: Immunochemical characterization and preferential binding to a trypsinsensitive macrophage receptor.Immunology 27:563.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zembala, M., andG. L. Asherson. 1970. Contact sensitivity in the mouse. V. Role of macrophage cytophilic antibody in passive transfer and the effect of trypsin and antigamma globulin serum.Cell. Immunol. 1:276.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Griswold, D. E., J. A. DiLorenzo, andP. Calabresi. 1974. Quantitation and pharmacological dissection of oxazolone-induced contact sensitivity in the mouse.Cell Immunol 11:198.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Evans, D. P., M. Hossack, andD. S. Thomson. 1971. Inhibition of contact sensitivity in the mouse by topical application of corticosteroids.Br. J. Pharmacol. 43:403.

    Google Scholar 

  10. De Sousa, M., andJ. Fachet. 1972. The cellular basis of the mechanism of action of cortisone acetate on contact sensitivity to oxazolone in the mouse.Clin. Exp. Immunol. 10:673.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Griswold, D. E., andD. T. Walz. 1977. Condition-dependent immunoregulatory control of contact sensitivity by levamisole.Inflammation 2:277.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Walz, D. T., andD. E. Griswold. 1978. Immunopharmacology of gold sodium thiomalate and auranofin (SK & F D-39162): Effects on cell-mediated immunity.Inflammation 3:117.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Walz, D. T., M. J. DiMartino, J. K. Kuch, andW. Zuccarello. 1970. Adjuvant-induced arthritis in rats: I. Temporal relationship of physiological, biochemical and hematological parameters.Proc. Soc. Biol. Med. 136:907.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bach, J. F. 1979. Thymic hormones.J. Immunopharmacol. 1:277–310.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Low, T. L., G. B. Thurman, C. Chincarini, J. E. McClune, G. D. Marshall, S. K. Hu, andA. L. Goldstein. 1979. Current status of thymosin research: evidence for the existence of a family of thymic factors that control T-cell maturation.Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 332:33–48.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Talal, N., M. Dauphinee, M. Pillarisetty, andR. Goldblum. 1975. Effect of thymosin on thymocyte proliferation and autoimmunity in NZB mice.Ann. N. Y. Acad Sci. 249: 438–561.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Flaut, M., L. M. Lichtenstein, E. Gillespie, andC. S. Henney. 1973. Studies on the mechanism of lymphocyte-mediated cytolysis. IV. Specificity of the histamine receptor on effector T cells.J. Immunol. 111:389–394.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schwartz, A., P. W. Askenase, andR. K. Gershon. 1980. Histamine Inhibition of the in vitro induction of cytotoxic T-cell response.Immunopharmacology 2:179–190.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shearer, G. M., K. L. Melmon, Y. Weinstein, andM. Sela. 1972. Regulation of antibody response by cells expressing histamine receptors.J. Exp. Med. 136:1302–1307.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rocklin, R. E., S. Greineder, andB. H. Littman. 1978. Modulating cellular immune function in vitro by histamine-bearing lymphocytes: Mechanism of action.Cell. Immunol. 37:162–173.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schwartz, A., S. L. Sutton, P. W. Askenase, andR. K. Gershon. 1981. Histamine inhibition of concanavalin A-induced suppressor T-cell activation.Cell. Immunol. 60:426–439.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Griswold, D. E., D. T.Walz, and S.Alessi. 1981. Stimulation of contact sensitivity by disodium cromoglycate.Int. Archs. Allergy Appl. Immun. (in press).

  23. Andersson, J., andF. Melchers. 1976. Lymphocyte stimulation by Concanavalin A.In Concanavalin A as a Tool. H. Bittiger and H. P. Schnebli, editors. Wiley & Sons, New York. 505.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Keller, R. 1976. Concanavalin A as a probe for the in vitro detection of IgE-type antibody on the surface of blood basophils and tissue mast cells.In Concanavalin A as a Tool. H. Bittiger and H. P. Schnebli, editors. Wiley & Sons, New York. 581.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jaffe, J. H., andW. R. Martin. 1975. Narcotic analgesics and antagonists.In The Pharmacological Basis for Therapeutics. L. S. Goodman and A. Gilman, editors. Macmillan, New York. 245–283.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Finkelstein, A. E., D. T. Walz, V. Batista, M. Mizrazi, F. Roisman, andA. Misher. 1976. Auranofin, a new oral gold compound for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.Ann. Rheum. Dis. 35:251–257.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zvaifler, N. J. 1979. Gold and antimalarial therapy.In Arthritis and Allied Conditions, D. J. McCarty, editor. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia. 355–367.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jaffe, I. A., andW. R. Martin. 1975. Narcotic analgesics and antagonists.In The Pharmacological Basis for Therapeutics. L. S. Goodman and A. Gilman, editors. Macmillan, New York. 245–283.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Griswold, D.E., Walz, D.T. Effect of selected immunoregulatory agents on low-grade contact sensitivity. Inflammation 6, 55–62 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00910719

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00910719

Keywords

Navigation