Skip to main content
Log in

The fourfold way: Determinism, moral responsibility, and Aristotelean causation

  • Psychiatry and Freedom
  • Published:
Metamedicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thomas Szasz's emphasis on goal-oriented behavior and moral responsibility has raised profound theoretical questions about an ancient and enduring problem in philosophy, the relationships amongfree will, determinism, and moral responsibility. Two early thinkers, Jonathan Edwards and Aristotle, have both contributed to an understanding of this dilemma. Edwards (1754) demonstrated that the concept of man as a moral agent and the doctrine of philosophical necessity are inextricably intertwined, in opposition to the tenets of contingency, moral indifference, and self-determining volition. However, his argument rested on efficient causationalone. For further light on the problem we can turn to Aristotle's writings, notably the distinguishing criteria of the ‘practical’ sciences (including psychology) as opposed to the theoretical and the productive sciences; and multiple causation, one of the most powerful tools for intellectual analysis ever invented, which includes material, formal, and final causes as well as the efficient cause. The implications of Szasz's work force a re-examination of the contributions of both Edwards and Aristotle and make them relevant to contemporary psychiatry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aristotle, Metaphysics, trans. by W. D. Ross, in Richard McKeon (ed.),The Basic Works of Aristotle, Random House, New York, 1941, pp. 681–926.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aristotle, Nichomachean Ethics, trans. by W. D. Ross, in Richard McKeon (ed.),The Basic Works of Aristotle, Random House, New York, 1941, pp. 927–1112.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aristotle, Nichomachean Ethics, trans. by J. A. K. Thomson, inThe Ethics of Aristotle, Penguin Books, Baltimore, MD, 1955.

  4. Aristotle,Physics, trans. by R. P. Hardie and R. K. Gaye, in Richard McKeon (ed.),The Basic Works of Aristotle, Random House, New York, 1941, pp. 213–394.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aristotle,Rhetoric, trans. by W. Rhys Roberts, in Richard McKeon (ed.),The Basic Works of Aristotle, Random House, New York, 1941, pp. 1317–1451.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baker, Robert, ‘Thomas Szasz: Founding father of the philosophy of psychiatry’, in M. E. Grenander (ed.),Proceedings of ASCLEPIUS AT SYRACUSE: Thomas Szasz, Libertarian Humanist, The Institute for Humanistic Studies, State University of New York at Albany, 1981, Vol. II, pp. 291–313.

  7. Davison, G., ‘Homosexuality: The ethical challenge’,Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 44, (1976) 157–62.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Democritus of Abdera, ‘Maxim 62’, in Kathleen Freeman (ed.),Ancilla to the Pre-Socratic Philosophers, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1957, p. 100.

  9. Eccles, Sir John Carew,The Understanding of the Brain, New York, 1973.

  10. Eddy, Willard O., ‘The scientific bases of naturalism in literature’,Western Humanities Review 8, (1954) 219–30.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Edwards, Jonathan,Freedom of the Will, ed. by Paul Ramsey, Vol. I in Perry Miller (ed.),The Works of Jonathan Edwards, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1962 (1754, 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Erwin, Edward,Behavior Therapy: Scientific, Philosophical, and Moral Foundations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1978, pp. 174–78.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gardner, Howard,The Quest for Mind: Piaget, Lévi-Strauss, and the Structuralist Movement, New York, 1973.

  14. Haag, Ernest van den, ‘No excuse for crime’, in Graeme R. Newman (ed.),Crime and Justice in America: 1776–1976, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 423, (1976) 133–41.

  15. Heisenberg, W., ‘Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quanten-theoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik’,Zeitschrift für Physik 43, (1927) 172–98.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hirsch, Andrew von, ‘Giving criminals their just deserts’,The Civil Liberties Review 3, (1976) 23.

    Google Scholar 

  17. ‘How Does the Brain Work?’,Search 1, (1975) 4–8.

  18. Jammer, Max,Concepts of Space: The History of Theories of Space in Physics, 2nd ed., Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1970 (1954), pp. 143, 193.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jammer, Max,The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics: The Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics in Historical Perspective, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1974, pp. 108–251.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kaufmann, Walter,Discovering the Mind, 3 vols.,I-Goethe, Kant, and Hegel; II-Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Buber; III-Freud versus Adler and Jung, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  21. King-Hele, Desmond,Shelley: His Thought and Work, 2nd ed., Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, Madison, NJ, 1971, p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lyon, Georges,L'Idéalisme en Angleterre au XVIII e Siècle, Paris, 1888, p. 406.

  23. Martin, Ronald E.,American Literature and the Universe of Force, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  24. McKeon, Richard, ‘Introduction: The philosophy of Aristotle’, in Richard McKeon (ed.),The Basic Works of Aristotle, Random House, New York, 1941, pp. xi-xxxiv.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nagel, Ernest,The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation, Harcourt, Brace, and World, New York, 1961, 293–335.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Novak, Michael,The Experience of Nothingness, Harper and Row, New York, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nozick, Robert, ‘Free will’, inPhilosophical Explanations, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1981, pp. 291–397.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Perry, Stuart M., ‘Necessity and the role of the hero inPrometheus Unbound’,PMLA 96, (1981) 244.

    Google Scholar 

  29. ‘Quanta’,The Sciences 15, (1975) 5, col. 3.

  30. Rank, Otto,Seelenglaube und Psychologie, Leipzig, 1973 (1930).

  31. Restak, Richard M., ‘The hemispheres of the brain have minds of their own’,New York Times, 25 January, 1976, p. 8-E.

  32. Rogers, Neville,Shelley at Work, 2nd ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1967, pp. 29–30.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Scott, William G., and David K. Hart,Organizational America, Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, 1979, p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Shaw, George Bernard, ‘Maxims for revolutionists’,Man and Superman, Penguin Books, Baltimore, 1974 (1903), p. 257.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sperry, Roger W., ‘Left-brain, right-brain’,Saturday Review 2, (9 August, 1975) 30–33.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Stent, Gunther S., ‘Limits to the scientific understanding of man’,Science 187, (21 March, 1975) 1053, 1055–56.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Szasz, Thomas, ‘The ethics of behavior therapy’, inThe Theology of Medicine: The Political-Philosophical Foundations of Medical Ethics, Harper and Row, New York, 1977, pp. 49–67.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Szasz, Thomas,Ideology and Insanity: Essays on the Psychiatric Dehumanization of Man, Anchor/Doubleday, Garden City, NY, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Szasz, Thomas,The Myth of Mental Illness: Foundations of a Theory of Personal Conduct, Harper and Row Publishing Co., New York, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Szasz, Thomas,The Myth of Psychotherapy: Mental Healing as Religion, Rhetoric, and Repression, Anchor Press/Doubleday, Garden City, NY, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tullock, Gorden, ‘Rent seeking as a negative-sum game’, in James M. Buchanan, Robert D. Tollison, and Gordon Tullock (eds.),Toward a Theory of the Rent-Seeking Society, Texas A & M University Press, College Station, 1980, pp. 16–36.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ullmann, L. P., ‘Behavior therapy as social movement’, in C. M. Franks (ed.),Behavior Therapy: Appraisal and Status, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1969, p. 528.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wright, Georg Henrik von,Causality and Determinism, Columbia University Press, New York, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grenander, M.E. The fourfold way: Determinism, moral responsibility, and Aristotelean causation. Metamedicine 3, 375–396 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00900939

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00900939

Key words

Navigation