Summary
Our results show that there are several distinct types of mental problems, rather than one underlying dimension of mental illness. In the past, some researchers have advocated the use of rating scales that measure global constructs such aS “mental health” or “psychological distress.” Others have advocated the diagnosis of discrete psychiatric disorders such as “depression,” “schizophrenia,” or “anxiety disorder.” Our analysis provides support for a synthesis of the two approaches to measuring psychiatric disorders. Psychopathology is multidimensional, and it is therefore most useful to examine distinct types. The symptoms in each cluster can be summed in a scale that represents its content, so researchers can explicitly distinguish among physiological malaise, demoralization, mistrust, antisocial attitudes, alcoholism, and so on without having to diagnose respondents. The use of multiple scales can allow researchers to represent the true diversity of mental problems in the community.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cox, G., Constanzo, P. R., & Coie, J. D. A survey instrument for the assessment of popular conceptions of mental illness.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1976,44, 901–909.
Crandell, D. L., & Dohrenwend, B. P. Some relations among psychiatric symptoms, organic illness, and social class.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1967,123, 1527–1538.
Dohrenwend, B. P., & Dohrenwend, B. S.Social status and psychological disorder: A causal inquiry. New York: Wiley, 1969.
Dohrenwend, B. P., & Dohrenwend, B. S. Reply to Gove and Tudor's comment on “Sex differences and psychiatric disorders.”American Journal of Sociology, 1977,82, 1336–1345.
Dohrenwend, B. P., Levav, I., & Shrout, P. E. Screening scales from the psychiatric epidemiology research interview (PERI). In M. M. Weissman, J. K. Myers, & C. E. Ross (Eds.),Community surveys in psychiatric epidemiology. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1983.
Dohrenwend, B. P., Oksenberg, L., Shrout, P. E., Dohrenwend, B. S., & Cook, D. What brief psychiatric screening scales measure. In S. Sudman (Ed.),Health survey research methods: Proceedings of the third biennial conference. Rockville, Md.: National Center for Health Services Research, 1981.
Dohrenwend, B. P., Shrout, P. E., Egri, G., & Mendelsohn, F. S. Nonspecific psychological distress and other dimensions of psychopathology.Archives of General Psychiatry, 1980,36, 1229–1236.
Downey, K. J. Public images of mental illness: A factor analytic study of causes and symptoms.Social Science and Medicine, 1967,1, 45–65.
Endicott, J., & Spitzer, R. L. What! Another rating scale? The psychiatric evaluation form.Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 1972,145, 88–104.
Endicott, J., & Spitzer, R. L. A diagnostic interview: The schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia.Archives of General Psychiatry, 1978,35, 837–844.
Frank, J. D.Persuasion and healing. New York: Schocken, 1974.
Gove, W. R., & Tudor, J. Sex differences in mental illness: A comment on Dohrenwend and Dohrenwend.American Journal of Sociology, 1977,82, 1327–1336.
Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. A multiphasic personality schedule (Minnesota): Construction of the schedule.Journal of Psychology, 1949,10, 249–254.
Johnson, D. R., & Meile, R. L. Does dimensionality bias in Langner's 22-item index affect the validity of social status comparison?Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1981,22, 415–433.
Kay, M. A. Health and illness in a Mexican-American barrio. In Spicer, E. H. (Ed.),Ethnic medicine in the Southwest. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1979.
Kruskal, J. B. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis.Psychometrika, 1964,29(1), 1–217. (a)
Kruskal, J. B. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method.Psychometrika, 1964,29(2), 115–129. (b)
Kruskal, J. B., & Wish, M.Multidimensional scaling. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1978.
Kruskal, J. B., Young, F. W., & Seery, J. B.How to use KYST, a very flexible program to do multidimensional scaling and unfolding. Murray Hill: Bell Laboratories, 1973.
Langner, T. S. A twenty-two item screening score of psychiatric symptoms indicating impairment.Journal of Health and Human Behavior, 1962,3, 269–276.
Roberts, R. E., Forthofer, R. N., & Fabrega, H. Further evidence on dimensionality of the index of psychophysiological stress.Social Science and Medicine, 1976,10, 483–490.
Robins, E.Diagnostic interview schedule. Rockville, Md.: Center for Epidemiologic Studies, NIMH, ADAMHA, 1979.
Rosenberg, S., & Cohen, B. D. A method for the study of lay conceptions of psychopathology: A free-response approach.American Journal of Community Psychology, 1977,5, 117–123.
Schwartz, C. C., Myers, J. K., & Astrachan, B. M. Comparing three measures of mental status: A note on the validity of estimates of psychological disorder in the community.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1973,14, 265–273.
Schiffman, S. S., Reynolds, M. L., & Young, F. W.Introduction to multidimensional scaling: Theory, methods, and applications. New York: Academic Press, 1981.
Seiler, L. H. The 22-item scale used in field studies of mental illness: A question of method, a question of substance, and a question of theory.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1973,14, 252–264.
Seiler, L. H., & Summers, G. F. Toward an interpretation of items used in field studies of mental illness.Social Science and Medicine, 1974,8, 459–467.
Shader, R. L., Ebert, M. H., & Harmatz, J. S. Langner's psychiatric impairment scale: A short screening device.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1971,128, 596–601.
Shepard, R. N. Representation of structure in similarity data: Problems and prospects.Psychometrika, 1974,39, 372–421.
Spitzer, R. L., Endicott, J., Fleiss, J. L., & Cohen, J. The psychiatric status schedule: A technique for evaluating psychopathology and impairment in role functioning.Archives of General Psychiatry, 1970,23, 41–55.
Spitzer, R. L., Fleiss, J. L., Endicott, J., & Cohen J. Mental status schedule: Properties of factor-analytically derived scales.Archives of General Psychiatry, 1967,16, 479–493.
Srole, L., & Fischer, A. K. The Midtown Manhattan longitudinal study vs. the mental Paradise Lost doctrine.Archives of General Psychiatry, 1980,37, 209–221. (a)
Scrole, L., & Fischer, A. K. Debate on psychiatric epidemiology.Archives of General Psychiatry, 1980,37, 1421–1423. (b)
Vernon, S. W., & Roberts, R. E. Measuring nonspecific psychological distress and other dimensions of psychopathology: Further observations on the problem.Archives of General Psychiatry, 1981,38, 1239–1247.
Weissman, M. M., & Klerman, G. L. Epidemiology of mental disorders: Emerging trends in the United States.Archives of General Psychiatry, 1978,35, 705–712.
Weissman, M. M., & Klerman, G. L. Psychiatric nosology and the Midtown Manhattan study.Archives of General Psychiatry, 1980,37, 229–230, 1423–1424.
Weissman, M. M., & Myers, J. K. Affective disorders in a U.S. urban community.Archives of General Psychiatry, 1978,38, 1304–1311.
Wheaton, B. Uses and abuses of the Langner index: A re-examination of findings on psychological and psychophysiological distress. In Mechanic, D. (Ed.),Psychosocial epidemiology: Symptoms, illness behavior, and help-seeking. New York: Neale Watson Academic, 1982.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
We thank Richard L. Hough and Dianne Timbers Fairbank for the use of the Life Change and Illness Research Project data. The Project was supported by grant RO1-MH16108 of the Center for Epidemiological Research of NIMH, by the Hogg Foundation for Mental Health, and by the University of Texas at El Paso.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mirowsky, J., Ross, C.E. The multidimensionality of psychopathology in a community sample. Am J Commun Psychol 11, 573–591 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00896806
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00896806