This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Reference Notes
Parkins, R. Proceedings of the Conference on Architectural Planning for Youth Corrections Facilities in the Community. University of Texas, Austin, April 1975.
Human Rights Research Council (sponsor).Juveniles and justice. Paper presented at the Symposium for Citizen Values and Law Enforcement Policy. School of Law, University of Texas, Austin, April 1975.
Kercher, G. A.The individualized treatment model in corrections. Symposium presented at the meeting of the Southwestern Psychological Association, Houston, Texas, April 1975.
References
Bandler, B. The reciprocal roles of the university and the community in the development of community mental health centers. In Atkins, R. W.,How the university can aid community mental health. Proceedings of the Scientific Conference, September 1969.
Birnbaum, M. The right to treatment.American Bar Association Journal, 1960,46, 499–505.
Brodsky, S. L. (Ed.).Psychologists in the criminal justice system. Carbondale: American Association of Correctional Psychology, 1972.
Donaldson vs. O'Connor, 493 F. 2d 507 (5th Cir. 1974).
Fremouw, W. J. A new right to treatment.Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 1974,2, 7–31.
Gattozzi, A. A. San Francisco Westside: A community mental health center serves the people. In Segal, J.,Mental Health Program Reports, 5. Maryland: National Institute of Mental Health, 1971.
Goffman, E.Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. New York: Doubleday, 1961.
Iscoe, I. Community psychology and the competent community.American Psychologist, 1974,29, 607–613.
Iscoe, I., Bloom, B. L., & Spielberger, C. D. (Eds.)Community psychology in transition. Washington, D.C.: Hemisphere, 1977.
Iscoe, I., & Spielberger, C. D. (Eds.).Community psychology: Perspectives in training and research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1970.
LaPiere, R. T.Social change. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965.
Levine, M. Scientific method and the adversary model: Some preliminary thoughts.American Psychologist, 1974,29, 661–677.
Miller, K. S.Managing madness: The case against civil commitment. New York: Free Press, 1976.
Morales vs. Turman, Civil Action #1948, D.C. Cir. (E.D. Tex. Memorandum Opinion and Order, August 30, 1974, pp. 180–181).
Proshansky, H. M. For what are we training our graduate students?American Psychologist, 1072,27, 205–212.
Ricci vs. Greenblatt (D. Mass.), C. S. No. 72-469-F, February 7, 1972.
Rouse vs. Cameron, 373 F.2d 451 (D.C. Cir. 1966).
Sas vs. Maryland, 334 F.2d 506 (4th Cir. 1964).
Silbert J. D., & Sussman, A. N. The rights of juveniles confined in training schools and the experience of a training school ombudsman.Brooklyn Law Review, 1974,40, 605–653.
Stickney, S. B. Problems in implementing the right to treatment in Alabama: The Wyatt vs. Stickney case.Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 1974,25, 453–463.
Szasz, T. S.The myth of mental illness: Foundations of a theory of personal conduct. New York: Harper & Row, 1961.
Szasz, T. S.Law, liberty and psychiatry: An inquiry into the social uses of mental health practices. New York: Macmillan, 1963.
Tapp, J. L. Psychology and the law: An overture.Annual Review of Psychology, 1976,27, 359–404.
Wyatt vs. Stickney, 325 F. Supp. 781 (M.D. Ala. 1971).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hill, G.W. Interdisciplinary field training for social change: A case study for psychology and law. Am J Commun Psychol 7, 223–230 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00894377
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00894377