Skip to main content
Log in

A configurational approach to Enterprise Strategy Scope: An Upper Echelons Perspective

  • Published:
International Journal of Value-Based Management

Abstract

Enterprise Strategy Scope is the range of stakeholder satisfaction realized by a firm. Using the Upper Echelons Perspective, this study takes a configurational approach in examining the correlates of Enterprise Strategy Scope by considering the environmental and organizational context as well as top management team's characteristics and firm performance. Empirical support was found for the two hypothesized types of enterprise strategy configurations. In addition, we discovered a third type of configuration which has not yet been discussed in the literature. Overall, these empirical results suggest that enterprise strategy is influenced by several contextual variables operating on multiple levels of analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bantel, K.A. and S.E. Jackson (1989). ‘Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference?’Strategic Management Journal, 10, 108–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, B. (1990). ‘Corporate linkages and organizational environment: A test of the resource dependence model.’Strategic Management Journal, 11, 419–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, S.N. and E.A. Molander (1977). ‘Is the ethics of business changing?’Harvard Business Review, 55 (1), 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dess, G.G. and D. Beard (1984). ‘Dimensions of organizational task environments.’Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 52–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, S. and D.C. Hambrick (1990). ‘Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion.’Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 484–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E. (1984).Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E. and D.R. Gilbert (1988).Corporate Strategy and the Search for Ethics. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandz, J. and P.R. McDonald. ‘Toward a system for satisfying salient values in the business environment.’ Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, San Francisco.

  • Gilbert, D.R. (1986). ‘Corporate strategy and ethics.’Journal of Business Ethics 5, 137–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goll, I. and Sambharya, R.B. (1990). ‘The effect of organizational culture and leadership on firm performance.’Advances in Strategic Management. Ed. P. Shrivastava and R. Lamb. 6: 183–200.

  • Hambrick, D.C. (1983). ‘An empirical typology of mature industrial-product environments.’Academy of Management Journal 26, 213–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D.C. (1984). ‘Taxonomic approaches to studying strategy: Some conceptual and methodological issues.’Journal of Management, 10, 27–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick D.C. and P.A. Mason (1984) ‘Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers.’Academy of Management Review, 9, 193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jauch, L.R., R.N. Osborn, and T.N. Martin (1980). ‘Structured content analysis of cases: A complementary method for organizational research.’Academy of Management Review, 5, 517–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keats, B.W. and M.A. Hitt (1988). ‘A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro organizational characteristics, and performance.’Academy of Management Journal, 31, 570–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimberly, J. (1976). ‘Organizational size and the structuralist perspective: A review, critique, and proposal.’Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 571–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P.R. and J.W. Lorsch (1967).Organizations and Environment. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, D.R. (1979).Market Research and Analysis. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, S.S. (1975). ‘The effect of size of firms on managerial attitudes.’California Management Review, 18(2), 59–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J., T. Schneeweis, and B. Branch. (1990). ‘Perceptions of firm quality: A cause or result of firm performance.’Journal of Management, 16, 167–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J., A. Sundgren, and T. Schneeweis (1988). ‘Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance.’Academy of Management Journal, 31, 854–872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meznar, M, J.J. Chrisman, and A.B. Carroll. (1990). ‘Social responsibility and strategic management: Toward and enterprise strategy classification.’Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, San Francisco, 332–336.

  • Michel, J.G. and D.C. Hambrick (1992). ‘Diversification posture and top management team characteristics.’Academy of Management Journal, 35, 9–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. and P.F. Friesen (1984).Organizations: A Quantum View. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1987a). ‘Organizational configurations: Cohesion, change, and prediction.’Human Relations, 43, 771–789.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1987b). ‘The genesis of configuration.’Academy of Management Review, 12, 686–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, G. (1980). ‘An examination of the effect of six types of error perturbation on fifteen clustering algorithms.’Psychometrika, 45, 325–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1979).The Structuring of Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. and J. Waters (1985). ‘Of strategies, deliberate and emergent.’Strategic Management Journal, 6, 257–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, D.G. (1967). ‘Measurement problems in cluster analysis.’Management Science, 13, B775-B780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norburn, D. and S. Birley, (1988). ‘The top management team and corporate performance.’Strategic Management Journal, 9, 225–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nystrom, P. (1990). ‘Strategies, management values, and outcomes in manufacturing companies.’International Journal of Value-based Management, 3, 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. (1980).Competitive Strategy. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, P. (1992). ‘The organizational taxonomy: Definition and design.’Academy of Management Review, 17, 758–781.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, L.V. (1990) The evolution of stakeholder management: Challenges and potential conflicts.International Journal of Value-Based Management, 3, 105–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schendel, D. and C. Hofer (Eds.) (1979).Strategic Management: A New View of Business Policy and Planning. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidheiny, S. (1992).Changing Course. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, P. and S. Nachman (1989). Strategic leadership patterns.Strategic Management Journal, 10, 51–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V. and B. Pahl (1971). Relationship between age and risk-taking among managers.Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, 399–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiersema, M.F. and K.A. Bantel (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change.Academy of Management Journal, 35, 91–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. (1991). Social issues in management: Theory and research in corporate social performance.Journal of Management, 17, 383–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R.K. and K.A. Heald (1975). Using the case survey method to analyze policy studies.Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 371–381.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

An earlier version of this paper was presented to the Business Policy and Strategy Division at the National Academy of Management Meetings in Atlanta in August, 1993.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Judge, W.Q., Fowler, D.M. A configurational approach to Enterprise Strategy Scope: An Upper Echelons Perspective. Int J Value-Based Manage 7, 91–106 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00890519

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00890519

Keywords

Navigation