Skip to main content
Log in

Human adaptation and energetic efficiency

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A lack of consensus on the general adaptive significance of energetic efficiency can be shown to exist in ecology and anthropology. After briefly reviewing key studies in optimal foraging theory and ecological anthropology, a model is presented which includes the following elements: (1) an equation of adaptive success with reproductive fitness, within an optimality framework; (2) a definition of energy limitation consistent with this framework; (3) a distinction between efficiency of energy capture and efficiency of energy use in achieving other goals; (4) a multiple definition of energetic efficiency that distinguishes purely energetic measures (output/input) from rate measures (energy captured per unit time); (5) the inclusion of time budgeting as a primary adaptive constraint; (6) a quantitative demonstration that increased output/input ratios do not consistently predict an increase in net energy captured, and are poor measures where time is a constraint. The general conclusion is that where energy is limiting, increased efficiency in the rate of energy capture will be adaptive because more net energy will be made available; where energy is not limiting, an increased net capture rate may still confer increased adaptive success, since time and labor energy are freed from energy-capture activities and can be devoted to achieving other adaptive goals. But while energetic efficiency, properly defined, is shown to have general adaptive significance in all cases where time or energy are constraints, considerations of adaptive optimality preclude the general equation of energetic efficiency and adaptive success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alland, A. (1975). Adaptation.Annual Review of Anthropology 4: 59–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alland, A., and McCay, B. (1973). The concept of adaptation in biological and cultural evolution. In Honigman, J. (ed.),Handbook of Social and Cultural Anthropology. Rand-McNally, Chicago, pp. 143–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, H. C. (1972). Intensification and disintensification in Pacific agriculture: A theoretical approach.Pacific Viewpoint 13: 30–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. L. (1964). The evolution of diversity in avian territorial systems.Wilson Bulletin 76: 160–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. L., and Orians, G. H. (1970). Spacing patterns in mobile animals.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1: 239–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caraco, T., and Wolf, L. (1975). Ecological determinants of group sizes of foraging lions.American Naturalist 109: 343–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov, E. L. (1976a). Optimal foraging: Attack strategy of a mantid.American Naturalist 110: 141–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov, E. L. (1976b). Optimal foraging: The marginal value theorem.Theoretical Population Biology 9: 129–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cody, M. L. (1974). Optimization in ecology.Science 183: 1156–1164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colinvaux, P. A. (1973).Introduction to Ecology. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell, F. (1955).Energy and Society. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durham, W. H. (1976a). Resource competition and human aggression: A review of primitive war.Quarterly Review of Biology 51: 385–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durham, W. H. (1976b). The adaptive significance of cultural behavior.Human Ecology 4: 89–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson-Hudson, R., and Smith, E. A. (1978). Human territoriality: An ecological reassessment.American Anthropologist 80: 21–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, J. M. (1966). The role of time and energy in food preferences.American Naturalist 100: 611–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, J. M. (1973).Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. J., III, and Watt, K. E. F. (1970). Refuging.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1: 263–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harpending, H., and Davis, H. (1977). Some implications for hunter-gatherer ecology derived from the spatial structure of resources.World Archaeology 8: 275–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. (1968).The Rise of Anthropological Theory. Crowell, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. (1975).Culture, People, Nature. Crowell, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, H. S. (1968). The adaptive significance of colonial nesting in the Brewers Blackbird (Euphagus cyanocephalus). Ecology 49: 682–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jochim, M. A. (1976).Hunter-Gatherer Subsistence and Settlement. A Predictive Model. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozlovsky, D. G. (1968). A critical evaluation of the trophic level concept. I. Ecological efficiencies.Ecology 49: 48–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lack, D. (1968).Ecological Adaptations for Breeding in Birds. Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. B. (1968). What hunters do for a living, or, how to make out on scarce resources. In Lee, R. B., and DeVore, I. (eds.),Man the Hunter. Aldine, Chicago, pp. 30–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. B. (1969). !Kung Bushman subsistence: An input-output analysis. In Vayda, A. P. (ed.),Environment and Cultural Behavior. Natural History Press, Garden City, N.Y., pp. 47–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. B. (1972). !Kung spatial organization: An ecological and historical perspective.Human Ecology 1: 125–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. C. (1970). The units of selection.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, M. A., and Morren, G. E. B., Jr. (1976).Ecology, Energetics, and Human Variability. W. C. Brown, Dubuque, Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotka, A. J. (1922). Contributions to the energetics of evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (U.S.A.) 8: 147–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. H. (1972).Geographical Ecology. Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. H., and Pianka, E. R. (1966). On optimal use of a patchy environment.American Naturalist 100: 603–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, L. (1968). Discussion. In Lee, R. B., and DeVore, I. (eds.),Man the Hunter. Aldine, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNab, E. K. (1963). Bioenergetics and the determination of home range size.American Naturalist 97: 133–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morren, G. E. B. (1977). From hunting to herding: Pigs and the control of energy in montane New Guinea. In Bayliss-Smith, T. P., and Feachem, R. G. (eds.),Subsistence and Survival, Rural Ecology in the Pacific. Academic Press, New York, pp. 273–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, E. P. (1971).Fundamentals of Ecology. 3rd ed. Saunders, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, H. T. (1971).Environment, Power, and Society. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, H. T. (1974). Energy, ecology and economics.CoEvolution Quarterly 1: 8–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, H. T., and Odum, E. C. (1976).Energy Basis for Man and Nature. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orians, G. H. (1971). Ecological aspects of behavior. In Farner, D., and King, J. (eds.),Avion Biology, Vol. 1. Academic Press, New York, pp. 513–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlman, S. M. (1976).Optimum Diet Models and Prehistoric Hunter-Gatherers: A Test on Martha's Vineyard. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka, E. R. (1974).Evolutionary Ecology. Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke, G. H., Pulliam, H. R., and Charnov, E. L. (1977). Optimal foraging: A selective review of theory and tests.Quarterly Review of Biology 52: 137–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, R. A. (1968).Pigs for the Ancestors. Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, R. A. (1971). The flow of energy in an agricultural society.Scientific American 224(3): 116–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapport, D. J. (1971). An optimization model of food selection.American Naturalist 105: 575–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richerson, P. J. (1977). Ecology and human ecology: A comparison of theories in the biological and social sciences.American Ethnologist 4: 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs, R. E. (1973).Ecology. Chiron Press, Newton, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. S., and Black, M. B. (1976). Subsistence strategy in the fish and hare period, Northern Ontario: The Weagamow Ojibwa, 1880–1920.Journal of Anthropological Research 32: 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royama, T. (1970). Factors governing the hunting behavior and selection of food by the great tit (Parus major L.). Journal of Animal Ecology 39: 619–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, M., and Service, E. (eds.). (1960).Evolution and Culture. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener, T. W. (1968). Sizes of feeding territories among birds.Ecology 49: 123–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener, T. W. (1969). Models of optimal size for solitary predators.American Naturalist 103: 277–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener, T. W. (1971). Theory of feeding strategies.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 2: 369–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobodkin, L. B. (1968). How to be a predator.American Zoologist 8: 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobodkin, L. B. (1972). On the inconstancy of ecological efficiency and the form of ecological theories.Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Sciences 44: 291–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobodkin, L. B. (1974). Prudent predation does not require group selection.American Naturalist 108: 665–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. C. (1968). The adaptive nature of social organization in the genus of tree squirrels Tamiascirius.Ecological Monographs 40: 349–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. A. and Thomas, R. B. (n.d.). Energetic efficiency and adaptation. In Thomas, R. B., and Harris, L. D. (eds.),Energy Flow and Human Adaptation. In preparation.

  • Stern, J. T., Jr. (1970). The meaning of “adaptation” and its relation to the phenomenon of natural selection. In Dobzhansky, T., Hecht, M. K., and Steere, W. C. (eds.),Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 4. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp. 39–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R. B. (1973).Human Adaptation to a High Andean Energy Flow System. Occasional Papers in Anthropology, No. 7, Department of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truswell, A. S., and Hansen, J. D. L. (1976). Medical research among the !Kung. In Lee, R. B., and DeVore, I. (eds.),Kalahari Hunter-Gatherers. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 166–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1971). The coal tit as a careful shopper.American Naturalist 105: 77–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vayda, A. P., and McCay, B. J. (1975). New directions in ecology and ecological anthropology.Annual Review of Anthropology 4: 293–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L. A. (1949).The Science of Culture. Grove Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L. A. (1959).The Evolution of Culture. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. C. (1966).Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. C. (ed.). (1971).Group Selection. Aldine, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilmsen, E. N. (1973). Interaction, spacing behavior, and the organization of hunting bands.Journal of Anthropological Research 29: 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1973). Group selection and its significance for ecology.BioScience 23: 631–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winterhalder, B. P. (1977).Foraging Strategy Adaptations of the Boreal Forest Cree: An Evaluation of Theory and Models from Evolutionary Ecology. Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winterhalder, B., Larsen, R., and Thomas, R. B. (1974). Dung as an essential resource in a highland Peruvian community.Human Ecology 2: 89–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wobst, H. M. (1974). Boundary conditions for Paleolithic social systems: a simulation approach.American Antiquity 39: 147–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, L. L., Hainsworth, F. R., and Gill, F. B. (1975). Foraging efficiencies and time budgets in nectar-feeding birds.Ecology 56: 117–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yellen, J., and Harpending, H. (1972). Hunter-gatherer populations and archaeological inference.World Archaeology 4: 244–253.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, E.A. Human adaptation and energetic efficiency. Hum Ecol 7, 53–74 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00889352

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00889352

Key words

Navigation