Abstract
Restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) in two regions of the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) repeat unit were examined in 33 strains representing 18 species ofSaprolegnia. The Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) was used to separately amplify the 18S rDNA and the region spanning the two internal transcribed spacers (ITS) and the 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene. Amplified products were subjected to a battery of restriction endonucleases to generate various fingerprints. The internal transcribed spacer region exhibited more variability than the 18S rDNA and yielded distinctive profiles for most of the species examined. Most of the species showing 100% similarity for the 18S rDNA could be distinguished by 5.8S + ITS restriction polymorphisms except forS. hypogyna, S. delica, S. lapponica, andS. mixta. The rDNA data indicate thatS. lapponica andS. mixta are conspecific withS. ferax, whereas there is no support for the proposed synonymies ofS. diclina withS. delica and ofS. mixta withS. monoica. Results from cluster analysis of the two data sets were very consistent and tree topologies were the same, regardless of the clustering method used. A further examination of multiple strains in theS. diclina-S. parasitica complex showed that restriction profiles are conserved across different strains ofS. parasitica originating from the U.K. and Japan.HhaI andBsaI restriction polymorphisms were observed in isolates from the U.S. and India. The endonucleaseBstUI was diagnostic forS. parasitica, generating identical fingerprints for all strains regardless of host and geographic origin. Except for the atypical strain ATCC 36144, restriction patterns were also largely conserved inS. diclina. Correlation of the rDNA data with morphological and ultrastructural features showed thatS. diclina andS. parasitica are not conspecific. Restriction polymorphisms in PCR-amplified rDNA provide a molecular basis for the classification ofSaprolegnia and will be useful for the identification of strains that fail to produce antheridia and oogonia.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beakes G (1983) A comparative account of cyst coat ontogeny in saprophytic and fish-lesion (pathogenic) isolates of theSaprolegnia diclina-parasitica complex. Can. J. Bot. 61: 603–625
Bullis RA, Noga EJ & Levy MG (1990) Immunological relationship of the fish-pathogenic oomyceteSaprolegnia parasitica to other oomycetes and unrelated fungi. J. Aquat. Anim. Health 2: 223–227
Cejp K (1959) Flora CSR I. Oomycetes. Českoslosvenská Akad. Věd, Sekce biologikcá, Praha (cited in Seymour 1970)
Chaplitski A, Galimova LM & Bubenshchikova SN (1986) The Saprolegniaceae genome as studied by DNA analysis. Zh. Evol. Biokhim. Fiziol. 22: 117–122
Clark-Walker GD & Gleason FH (1973) Circular DNA from the water moldSaprolegnia. Arch. Mikrobiol. 92: 209–216
Coker WC (1923) The Saprolegniaceae with Notes on Other Watermolds. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill
Dick, MW (1969) Morphology and taxonomy of the Oomycetes, with special reference to Saprolegniaceae, Leptomitaceae and Pythiaceae. I. Sexual reproduction. New Phytol. 68: 751–775
Dick, MW (1973) Saprolegniales. In: Ainsworth GC, Sparrow FK & Sussman AS (Eds) The Fungi — an Advanced Treatise, Vol IVB (pp 113–114), Academic Press, New York
Dykstra MJ, Levine JF, Noga EJ, Hawkins JH, Gerdes P, Hargis WJ Jr, Grier JH & Te Strake D (1989) Ulcerative mycosis a serious menhaden disease of the southeastern coastal fisheries of the U.S.A. J. Fish Dis. 12: 175–178
Green BR & Dick MW (1972) DNA base composition and the taxonomy of the Oomycetes. Can. J. Microbiol. 18: 963–968
Hallett IC & Dick MW (1986) Fine structure of zoospore cyst ornamentation in the Saprolegniaceae and Pythiaceae. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 86: 457–463
Hatai K, Willoughby LG & Beakes GW (1990) Some characteristics ofSaprolegnia obtained from fish hatcheries in Japan. Mycol. Res. 94: 182–190
Johnson TW Jr (1956) Notes on fungi from Mississippi. I. Aquatic Phycomycetes. Amer. Midl. Nat. 55: 184–193
Jong SC, Davis EE, McManus C & Krichevsky MI (1991) Computer coding of strain features of the saprolegnian fungi. Mycotaxon 41: 407–418
Jorgensen RA & Cluster PD (1989) Modes and tempos in the evolution of nuclear ribosomal DNA: new characters for evolutionary studies and new markers for genetic and population studies. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 75: 1238–1247
Kurtzman CP, Phaff HJ & Meyer SA (1983) Nucleic acid relatedness among yeasts. In: Spencer JFT, Spencer DM & Smith ARW (Eds) Yeast Genetics — Fundamental and Applied Aspects (pp. 139–166). Springer-Verlag, New York
Medlin L, Elwood J, Stickel S & Sogin ML (1988) The characterization of enzymatically amplified eukaryotic 16S-like rRNA-coding regions. Gene 71: 491–499
Molina FI, Inoue T & Jong S-C (1992a) Ribosomal DNA restriction analysis reveals genetic heterogeneity inSaccharomyces cerevisiae Meyen ex Hansen. Int. J. System. Bacteriol. 42: 499–502
Molina FI, Inoue T, & Jong, S-C (1992b) Restriction polymorphisms in the internal transcribed spacers and 5.8S rDNA ofSaccharomyces. Curr. Microbiol. 25: 251–255
Neish GA & Green BR (1976) Nuclear and satellite DNA base composition and the taxonomy ofSaprolegnia (Oomycetes). J. Gen. Microbiol. 96: 215–219
Ogbonna CIC & Alabi RO (1991) Studies on species of fungi associated with mycotic infections of fish in a Nigerian freshwater fish pond. Hydrobiologia 220: 131–135
Ojha M, Dutta SK & Turian G (1975) DNA nucleotide sequence homologies between some zoosporic fungi. Mol. Gen. Genet. 136: 151–165
Pickering AD, Willoughby LG & McGrory CB (1979) Fine structure of secondary zoospore cyst cases ofSaprolegnia isolates from infected fish. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 72: 427–436
Price CW, Fuson GB & Phaff HJ (1978) Genome comparison in yeast systematics: delimitation of species within the generaSchwannyomyces, Saccharomyces, Debaryomyces, andPichia. Microbiol. Rev. 42: 161–193
Rohlf FJ (1990) NTSYS-pc: Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Exeter Publishing, New York
Scott WW (1961) A monograph of the genusAphanomyces. Va. Agr. Exp. Sta., Tech. Bull. 151: 1–95
Sekino T, Kubota S, Morikawa S, Tashiro F & Komatsu T (1987) Studies on the dynamics of water molds in the ponds of fish farm —Saprolegnia, Achlya, Aphamomyces, Leptolegnia. Bull. Nippon Vet. Zootech. Coll. 0 (36): 70–77
Seymour R (1970) The genusSaprolegnia. Nova Hedwigia 19: 1–124
Sogin ML & Gunderson JH (1987) Structural diversity of eukaryotic small subunit ribosomal RNAs: Evolutionary implications. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 503: 125–139
Sparrow FK Jr (1960) Aquatic Phycomycetes. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
Srivastava RC & Srivastava GC (1978) Fungi associated with the diseases of freshwater fishes. Mycopathologia 63: 121–126
Storck R & Alexopoulos CJ (1970) Deoxyribonucleic acid of fungi. Bacteriol. Rev. 34: 126–154
White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S & Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ & White TJ (Eds) PCR Protocols (pp 315–322). Academic Press, San Diego
Willoughby, LG (1978) Saprolegnias of salmonid fish in Windermere: a critical analysis. J. Fish Dis. 1: 51–67
Willoughby, LG (1985) Rapid preliminary screening ofSaprolegnia on fish. J. Fish Dis. 8: 473–476
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Molina, F.I., Jong, SC. & Ma, G. Molecular characterization and identification ofSaprolegnia by restriction analysis of genes coding for ribosomal RNA. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 68, 65–74 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00873294
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00873294