Skip to main content
Log in

Multiple-objective stochastic waste-load allocation

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The practice of waste-load allocation in water quality management involves several noncommensurate and conflicting objectives. In particular, the objectives considered in this multiobjective stochastic waste-load allocation study are (1) maximization of total waste discharge, (2) maximization of instream dissolved oxygen concentration, (3) minimization of difference in equity measures, and (4) maximization of reliability of water quality compliance. To demonstrate the analysis, the model was applied to an example involving six waste dischargers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brill, E., Liebman, J., and ReVelle, C., 1976, Equity measures for exploring water-quality management alternatives,Water Resour. Res. 12, 845–851.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burn, D. H. and McBean, E. A., 1985, Optimization modeling of water-quality in an uncertain environment,Water Resour. Res. 21, 934–940.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadderton, R. A., Miller, A. D., and McDonnell, A. J., 1981, Analysis of waste load allocation procedure,Water Resour. Bull. 17(5), 760–766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadderton, R. A., Miller, A. C., and McDonnell, A. J., 1982, Uncertainty analysis, of dissolved oxygen model,J. Environ. Engr. 108(5), 1003–1012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W., 1963, Deterministic equivalents for optimizing and satisficing under chance constraints,Operations Res. 11(1), 18–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohon, J. L., 1978,Multiobjective Programming and Planning, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbins, W. E., 1964, BOD and oxygen relationships in stream,J. of Sani. Engr. Div. 90(4), 53–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, J. H., 1987, Stochatic water-quality optimization using imbedded chance constraints,Water Resour. Res. 23(12), 2227–2238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esen, I. I. and Rathbun, R. E., 1976, A stochastic model for predicting the probability distribution of the dissolved oxygen deficit in streams, USGS,Professional Paper 913.

  • Fujiwara, O., Gnanendran, S. K., and Ohgaki, S., 1986, River quality management under stochastic streamflow,J. Environ. Engr. 112[EE2], 185–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goicoechea, A., Hansen, D. R., and Duckstein, L., 1982,Multi-Objective Decision Analysis with Engineering and Business Applications, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, W. M., 1965, A lawyer looks at stream pollution,Civil Engineering; 44–45.

  • Haimes, Y. Y., 1977,Hierarchical Analyses of Water Resources Systems, McGrawHill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hathhorn, W. E., 1986, Optimal waste load allocation in a stream environment under uncertainty, MS Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornberger, G. M., 1980, Uncertainty in dissolved oxygen prediction due to variability in algal photosyntheses,Water Res. 14, 355–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolbin, V. V., 1977,Stochastic Programming, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothandaraman, V. and Ewing, B. B., 1969, A probabilistic analysis of dissolved oxygen-biochemical oxygen demand relationship in stream.J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 41(2), R73-R90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krenkel, P. A. and Novotony, V., 1980,Water Quality Management, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasdon, L. S. and Warren, A. D., 1979, Generalized reduced gradient software for linear and nonlinear constrained problems, in H. Greenferg (ed.),Design and Implementation for Optimization Sopftware, Sijthoff and Noordhoff.

  • Lohani, B. N. and Thanh, W. R., 1978, Stochastic programming model for water-quality management in a river,J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 50, 2175–2182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks, D. P., Revelle, C. S., and Lynn, W. R., 1967, Linear programming models for water pollution control,Management Sci., B166–B181.

  • Mass, A.,et al., 1962,Design of Water Resource Systems, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marglin, S. A., 1967,Public Investment Criteria, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. L. and Gill, J. H., 1976, Equity considerations on controlling nonpoint pollution from agricultural sources,Wat. Resour. Bull. 12(2), 253–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeter, H. W. and Phelps, E. B., 1925, A study of the pollution and natural purification of the Ohio River,Public Health Bulletin 146, U.S. Public Health Service, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tung, Y. K., 1986, Groundwater management by chance-constrained model,J. Water Resour. Plan. Mgmt. 122(1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tung, Y. K. and Hathhorn, W. E., 1988, Assessment of probability distribution of dissolved oxygen deficit,J. Environ. Engr,. 114(6), 1421–1435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tung, Y. K. and Hathhorn, W. E., 1989, Multiple-objective waste load allocation,Intl. J. Water Resour. Mgmt. 3; 129–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tung, Y. K., and Hathhorn, W. E., 1990, Stochastic waste load allocation,J. Ecol. Model. 51, 29–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, R. C. and Loftis, J. C., Incorporating the stochastic nature of water-quality into management,J. Water Pollut Control Fed. 55(4), 408–414.

  • Yaron, D., 1979, A method for the analysis of seasonal aspects of water-quality control,J. Environ. Econ. Mgmt. 6.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

On sabbatical leave from the Wyoming Water Research Center, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, U.S.A.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tung, YK. Multiple-objective stochastic waste-load allocation. Water Resour Manage 6, 117–133 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872207

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872207

Keywords

Navigation