Skip to main content
Log in

Waste load allocation in rivers under uncertainty: application of social choice procedures

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a waste load allocation model is developed which can incorporate uncertainties due to randomness as well as vagueness regarding some variables and parameters. A probabilistic water quality index is also presented and used in the waste load allocation model. For any discharger of the system, different wastewater treatment scenarios are defined. All possible combinations of these scenarios make different wastewater treatment alternatives for the system. An optimization model having the objectives of minimizing total treatment cost as well as water quality violation risk is also developed for finding the optimum treatment alternatives. The uncertainty related to the upstream river flow is addressed through considering probability distribution functions with fuzzy parameters. To deal with fuzzy and random inputs, the fuzzy transformation technique and Monte Carlo analysis are respectively used, and for each alternative, fuzzy membership function of the violation risk is obtained. The optimization model only takes into account the economic and environmental objectives and does not specifically consider the stakeholders satisfaction. To consider this and help the decision maker choose a final alternative among non-dominated solutions, three different social choice procedures which focus on stakeholders priorities are employed. The applicability and effectiveness of the methodology are evaluated by applying it to the Zarjub River in Iran facing serious water quality issues. The results indicate that the presented methodology can effectively take account of priorities of various decision makers as well as economic and environmental considerations, while incorporating multiple forms of uncertainties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BOD5 :

5-Day biochemical oxygen demand

DO:

Dissolved oxygen

DOE:

Department of Environment

FIS:

Fuzzy inference system

IDOE:

Iran Department of Environment

MSE:

Mean square error

NO3 :

Nitrate

NSGAII:

Non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm

PDF:

Probability distribution functions

PPRA:

Probabilistic pattern recognition algorithm

PWQI:

Probabilistic water quality index

RI:

Ranking index

SC:

Social choice

WLA:

Waste load allocation

WQI:

Water quality index

References

  • Abed-Elmdoust, A., & Kerachian, R. (2012). Water quality management under incomplete information: application of an N-person iterated signaling game. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 184, 5875–5888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. M., & Wang, C. H. (2009). Fuzzy risk analysis based on ranking fuzzy numbers using α-cuts, belief features and signal/noise ratios. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 5576–5581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, J. H., & Lee, J. H. (2014). Multi-objective waste load allocation model for optimizing waste load abatement and inequality among waste dischargers. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 225(3), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • d’Angelo, A., Eskandari, A., & Szidarovszky, F. (1998). Social choice procedures in water-resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 52, 203–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Borda, J. C. (1781). Mémoire sur les elections au scrutin. Paris: Historie de l’Axademie Royale des Sciences.

  • Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., & Meyarivan, T. (2002). A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. Evolutionary Computation, 6(2), 182–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, P., Li, Y. P., & Huang, G. H. (2013). Inexact chance-constrained waste-load allocation model for water quality management of Xiangxihe River. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 139(9), 1178–1197.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, S., & Mujumdar, P. (2010). Fuzzy waste load allocation model: a multiobjective approach. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 12, 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, R. U., Martinez, Y., & Rodrigo, J. (2008). Water allocation by social choice rules: the case of sequential rules. Ecological Economics, 65, 304–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, P., & Huang, G. H. (2009). Inexact fuzzy-stochastic mixed-integer programming approach for long-term planning of waste management—part A: methodology. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(2), 461–470.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haghighi, A., & Zahdei Asl, A. (2014). Uncertainty analysis of water supply networks using the fuzzy set theory and NSGA-II. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 32, 270–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanss, M. (2002). The transformation method for the simulation and analysis of systems with uncertain parameters. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 130, 277–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iran Department of Environment (2005). Developing pollution discharge permits in the Zarjub River basin. Technical Report.

  • Kerachian, R. (2012). Application of trading discharge permits for river water quality management. Technical report, Iran Water Resources Management Company.

  • Liu, D., Guo, S., Shao, Q., Jiang, Y., & Chen, X. (2014). Optimal allocation of water quantity and waste load in the Northwest Pearl River Delta, China. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 28(6), 1525–1542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahjouri, N., & Bizhani-Manzar, M. (2013). Waste load allocation in rivers using fallback bargaining. Water Resources Management, 9(3), 59–74.

  • Malakpour Estalaki, S., Abed-Elmdoust, A., & Kerachian, R. (2014). Developing environmental penalty functions for river water quality management: application of evolutionary game theory. Environmental Earth Sciences. doi:10.1007/s12665-014-3706-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamdani, E. H., & Assilian, S. (1975). An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. International Journal of Man–Machine Studies, 7, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesbah, S. M., Kerachian, R., & Nikoo, M. R. (2009). Developing real time operating rules for trading discharge permits in rivers: application of Bayesian networks. Environmental Modelling and Software, 24, 238–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesbah, S. M., Kerachian, R., & Torabian, A. (2010). Trading pollutant discharge permits in rivers using fuzzy nonlinear cost functions. Desalination, 250, 313–317.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morais, D. C., & de Almeida, A. T. (2012). Group decision making on water resources based on analysis of individual rankings. Omega, 40, 42–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikoo, M. R., Kerachian, R., Malakpour-Estalaki, S., Bashi-Azghadi, S. N., & Azimi, M. M. (2011). A probabilistic water quality index for river water quality assessment: a case study. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 181(1–4), 465–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikoo, M. R., Kerachian, R., & Niksokhan, M. H. (2012). Equitable waste load allocation in rivers using fuzzy bi-matrix games. Water Resources Management, 26, 4539–4552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikoo, M. R., Kerachian, R., Karimi, A., & Azadnia, A. A. (2013). Optimal water and waste-load allocations in rivers using a fuzzy transformation technique: a case study. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 185, 2483–2502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikoo, M. R., Kerachian, R., Karimi, A., Azadnia, A. A., & Jafarzadegan, K. (2014). Optimal water and waste load allocation in reservoir–river systems: a case study. Environmental Earth Sciences, 71(9), 4127–4142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niksokhan, M. H., Kerachian, R., & Amin, P. (2009). A stochastic conflict resolution model for trading pollutant discharge permits in river systems. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 154(1–4), 219–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ocampo-Duque, W., Ferré-Huguet, N., Domingo, J. L., & Schuhmacher, M. (2006). Assessing water quality in rivers with fuzzy inference systems: a case study. Environment International, 32, 733–742.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qin, X. S. (2012). Assessing environmental risks through fuzzy parameterized probabilistic analysis. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 26, 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehana, S., & Mujumdar, P. (2009). An imprecise fuzzy risk approach for water quality management of a river system. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 3653–3664.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, A., Reilly, B., & Ellis, A. (2005). Electoral system design: the new international IDEA handbook. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.

  • Sheikhmohammady, M., Kilgour, D. M., & Hipel, K. W. (2010). Modeling the Caspian Sea negotiations. Group Decision and Negotiation, 19(2), 149–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavakoli, A., Kerachian, R., Nikoo, M. R., Soltani, M., & Estalaki, S. M. (2014). Water and waste load allocation in rivers with emphasis on agricultural return flows: application of fractional factorial analysis. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 186(9), 5935–5949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, P. D. (1993). Advanced methods in neural computing (pp. 35–55). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Najmeh Mahjouri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahjouri, N., Abbasi, MR. Waste load allocation in rivers under uncertainty: application of social choice procedures. Environ Monit Assess 187, 5 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-4194-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-4194-7

Keywords

Navigation