Abstract
The neurotoxin notechis II-5 (N-II-5) from the venom of the Australian tiger snake (Viperidae family) gave rise to changes in the frequency of miniature end-plate potentials (MEPP) in the mouse diaphragm in three distinct phases: An initial decrease in frequency, then an increase, and finally a decrease in the frequency of MEPP or even a complete block. The effect of N-II-5 was enhanced with a rise in the temperature of the solution from 20 to 30 and 35°C. There was no effect if Ca++ was removed from the solution. Addition of Ca++ to the solution after washing the muscle to remove N-II-5 effect. In the presence of N-II-5, an increase in the K+ concentration in the solution to 20 mM did not lead to a sharp increase in the frequency of MEPP typical of depolarized nerve endings. Agents which increased the intracellular Ca++ concentration, not through depolarization of the nerve endings (hypertonic solution, ionophore A 23187), preserved the ability to increase the frequency of MEPP. It is suggested that the presynaptic effect of N-II-5 is connected with its phosphorylase activity and can be explained by the disturbance of the activity of the liberation sites and not by exhaustion of mediator reserves.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
M. A. Kamenskaya, L. G. Magazanik, E. R. Kotova et al., Byull. Éksp. Biol. Med., No. 5, 396 (1979).
R. B. Beechej, Biochem. J.,98, 284 (1966).
J. Halpert and D. Eaker, J. Biol. Chem.,251, 7343 (1976).
H. Kita and W. Van der Kloot, J. Neurophysiol.,40, 212 (1977).
A. W. Liley, J. Physiol. (London),134, 427 (1956).
L. G. Magazanik and T. I. Slavnova, Physiol. Bohemoslov.,27, 421 (1978).
H. E. Statham and C. J. Duncan, Life Sci.,17, 1401 (1975).
J. F. Wenicke, A. D. Vanker, and B. D. Howard, J. Neurochem.,25, 483 (1975).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kamenskaya, M.A., Satybaldina, N.K. Action of the presynaptic neurotoxin notechis II-5 from the venom of Notechis scutatus scutatus on mouse motor nerve endings. Bull Exp Biol Med 88, 1132–1134 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00838185
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00838185