Abstract
Mustine inhibits the template activity of chromatin and DNA in an RNA-polymerase system in vitro much more strongly than its monofunctional analogue. Chromatin is more sensitive to the action of mustine than is deproteinized DNA. However, the template activity of DNA is reduced to a greater degree by the action of the monofunctional analogue of mustine than is that of chromatin. The mechanism of inhibition of the template activity of chromatin by mustine is probably connected with the ability of the compound to form DNA-protein cross-linkages in the chromatin structure.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
N. A. Sokolov, E. G. Piker, N. V. Chelyapov, et al., in: Physicochemical Bases of Function of Supramolecular Cell Structures [in Russian], Moscow (1974), Part 2, p. 102.
A. S. Spirin, Biokhimiya, No. 5, 656 (1958).
P. I. Tseitlin, N. V. Chelyapov, A. I. Gorin, et al., Byull. Éksperim. Biol. i Med., No. 5, 41 (1972).
P. I. Tseitlin, A. I. Gorin, N. V. Chelyapov, et al., Molecular Mechanisms of Genetic Processes: Mutagenesis and Repair [in Russian], Moscow (1973), p. 49.
H. Brewer and L. Aronow, Cancer Res.,23, 285 (1963).
R. Golder et al., Cancer Res.,24, 964 (1964).
E. Kay, N. Simmons, and A. Daunce, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,74, 1724 (1952).
P. Lawley and P. Brookes, Exp. Cell Res.,9, Suppl., 512 (1963).
O. Lowry, N. Rosebrough, A. Farr, et al., J. Biol. Chem.,193, 265 (1951).
B. Puschendorf, H. Wolf, and H. Grunike, Biochem. Pharmacol.,20, 3039 (1971).
L. Shaw and R. Huang, Biochemistry (Washington),9, 5430 (1970).
G. Wheeler, Fed. Proc.,26, 885 (1967).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Translated from Byulleten' Éksperimental'noi Biologii i Meditsiny, Vol. 80, No. 8, pp. 106–109, August, 1975.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sokolov, N.A., Piker, E.G., Mironov, N.M. et al. Effect of mustine (HN2) and its monofunctional analogue (HN1) on template activity of chromatin and DNA in an RNA-polymerase system in vitro. Bull Exp Biol Med 80, 975–978 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00789286
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00789286