Skip to main content
Log in

Preliminary notes on a theory of informal barriers for women in mathematics

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Armstrong, J. and Price, R. A.: 1982, ‘Correlates and predictors of women's mathematics participation’,Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 13, 99–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, H. and Bayer, A.: 1973, ‘Sex discrimination in academe’, in A.Rossi and A.Calderwood (eds.),Academic Women on the Move, Russell Sage, New York, pp. 333–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J. W.: 1964,An Introduction to Motivation, Van Nostrand, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, V. C.: 1969, ‘Sex differences in expectancy of intellectual and academic reinforcement’, in C. P.Smith (ed.):Achievement-Related Behaviors in Children, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, R.: 1974,Mixed or Single-sex Schools?, Vol. III, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, L. and Gordon, L. K.: 1979,The Sociology of Gender, Rand McNally, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, D.: 1976, ‘Sex: A perspective on the attributional process’, in J.Harvey, W.Ickes, and R.Kidd (eds.):New Directions in Attribution Research (Vol. 1), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N.: 1982, ‘Towards an interpretative interactionism’, paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Study of Symbolic Interaction, San Francisco.

  • Dweck, C. S. and Repucci, N. D.: 1973, ‘Learned helplessness and reinforcement responsibility in children’,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 25, 109–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J.: 1984, ‘Sex differences in math participation’, in M. L.Maehr and M.W.Steinkamp (eds.):Women in Science: Vol. 2. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 93–137, JAI Press, Inc., Greenwich, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., and Midgley, C.: 1983, ‘Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors’, in J.Spence (ed.):Achievement and Achievement Motivation, W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J., Adler, T. F., and Meece, J. L.: 1984, ‘Sex differences in achievement: A test of alternative theories’,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46 (1), 26–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennema, E.: 1981, ‘Girls, women, and mathematics’, in R. Kennedy (ed.).Girls, Mathematics, and Employment, Proceedings from the Conference “Girls, Women, and Employment”, Sydney, Australia.

  • Fennema, E. and Peterson, P. L.: 1985, ‘Learning autonomous behaviors’, in L.Cherry-Wilkinson and C.Marrett (eds.):Gender-related Differences in Classroom Interactions, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennema, E. and Sherman, J. A.: 1978, ‘Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement spatial visualization, and affective factors’,American Educational Research Journal 14, 51–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennema, E. and Sherman, J. A.: 1978, ‘Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement and related factors: A further study’,Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 9, 189–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, L. H.: 1980,The Problem of Women and Mathematics, Ford Foundation, 320 E. 43rd Street, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieze, I. H. and Hanusa, I. H.: 1984, ‘Women scientists: Overcoming barriers’, in M.Steinkamp and M. L.Maehr (eds.)Women in Sctence: Vol. 2. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, pp. 139–163, JAI Press, Inc., Greenwich, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C.: 1979,The Interpretation of Cultures, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C.: 1979, ‘Women's place in man's life cycle’,Harvard Educational Review 49, 431–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitelson, I. B., Peterson, A. C., and Tobin-Richards, M. H.: 1982, ‘Adolescents' expectations of success, self-evaluations, and attributions about performance on spatial and verbal tasks’,Sex Roles 8, 411–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grieb, H. and Easley, J.: 1984, ‘A primary school impediment to mathematical equity: Case studies in role-dependent socialization’, in M.Steinkamp and M. L.Maehr (eds.):Women in Science: Vol. 2. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, pp. 317–362, JAI Press, Inc., Greenwich, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, J.: 1981, ‘Sex differences in science examinations’, in A.Kelly (ed.):The Missing Half, Manchester University Press, Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horner, M.: 1972, ‘Toward an understanding of achievement-related conflicts in women’,Journal of Social Issues 28, 157–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horner, M.: 1968,Sex Differences in Achievement Motivation and Performance in Competitive and Non-competitive Situations, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.

  • Husen, T. (ed.): 1967,International Study of Achievement in Mathematics: A Comparison in Twelve Countries, Almquist & Wiksell, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, J. and Moss, H. A.: 1962,Birth to Maturity, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeves, J. P. and Read, A. D.: 1974,Sex Differences in Preparing for Scientific Occupations, Hawthorn, ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, A.: 1974,An Unfair Profession: A Review of the Position of British Women in Science, Edinburgh Centre for Educational Sociology, University of Edinburgh.

  • Lantz, A. E. and Smith, G. P.: 1981, ‘Factors influencing the choice of nonrequired mathematics courses’,Journal of Educational Psychology 73, 825–827.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leder, G. C.: 1982, ‘Learned helplessness in the classroom: A further look’,Research in Mathematics Education in Australia 2, 40–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leder, G. C.: 1984, ‘What price success? The view from the media’,The Exceptional Child 31, in press.

  • Levinson, D.: 1978,The Seasons of Man's Life, Alfred Knopf, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K.: 1938,The Conceptual Representation and the Measurement of Psychological Forces, Duke University Press, Durham, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luchins, E. H. and Luchins, A. S.: 1980, ‘Female mathematicians: A contemporary appraisal’, in L. H.Fox, L.Brody, and D.Tobin (eds.),Women and the Mathematical Mystique, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E. and Jacklin, C. N.: 1974,The Psychology of Sex Differences, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maines, D., Sugure, N., and Hardesty, M.: 1981, ‘Social processes of sex differentiation in mathematics’, Final Report to the National Institute of Education, Washington, D.C.

  • Maines, D., Hardesty, M., and Sugure, N.: 1982, ‘The context of role modeling for males and females in mathematics’, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Sociological Society, Des Moines, Iowa.

  • Maines, D. and Hardesty, M.: 1983, ‘Anticipations of family, work, and education participation as sex differentiated temporal orders’, Unpublished manuscript on file with the Program on Women, Northwestern University.

  • Mead, G. H.: 1934,Mind, Self, and Society, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meece, J. L., Eccles (Parsons), J., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., and Kaczala, C. M.: 1982, ‘Sex differences in math achievement: Toward a model of academic choice’,Psychological Bulletin 91, 324–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, S. C.: 1979, ‘Sex role as a mediator of intellectual functioning’, in M. A.Wittig and A. C.Peterson (eds.),Sex-related Differences in Cognitive Functioning. pp. 263–302, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osen, L.: 1974,Women and Mathematics, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, R.: 1926, ‘The Urban community as a spatial pattern and a moral order’, reprinted in Ralph Turner (ed.):Robert Park on Social Control and Collective Behavior, University of Chicago Press.

  • Pedro, J. D., Wolleat, P., Fennema, E., and Becker, A. D.: 1981, ‘Election of high school mathematics by females and males: Atributions and attitudes’,American Educational Research Journal 207–218.

  • Rossi, A. S.: 1972, ‘Barriers to the career choice of engineering, medicine, or science among American women’, in J. M.Bardwick (ed.):Readings in the Psychology of Women, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlossberg, N.: 1974, ‘The right to be wrong is gone; Women in academe’,Educational Record 55, 257–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuard, H. B.: 1982, ‘Differences in mathematical performance between girls and boys’, in W. H.Cockcroft (ed.):Mathematics Counts, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simkin, K.: 1979, ‘Sex differences in pupils commitment to school success’,Australian Association for Research in Education Proceedings 123–131.

  • Stein, A. H. and Bailey, M. M.: 1975, ‘The socialization of achievement motivation in women’, in M. T. S.Mednick, S. S.Tangri, and L. W.Hoffman (eds.)Women and Achievement, Hemisphere Publishing Company, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. 1974,Achievement Motivation and Attribution Theory, General Learning Press, Morristown, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolleat, P. L., Pedro, J. D., Becker, A. D., and Fennema, E.: 1980, ‘Sex differences in high school students causal attributions of performance in mathematics’,Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 11, 356–366.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maines, D.R. Preliminary notes on a theory of informal barriers for women in mathematics. Educ Stud Math 16, 314–320 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00776740

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00776740

Keywords

Navigation