Skip to main content
Log in

Simultaneity, conventialism, general covariance, and the special theory of relativity

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
General Relativity and Gravitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a recent article, De Ritis and Guccioni claimed to give an easy way of falsifying the conventionalist interpretation of the definition of simultaneity of distant events within an inertial system. For a particular closed light path, they derived a necessary condition and claimed that it could be violated by a nonstandard choice of the definition of simultaneity. It is pointed out here that (as shown by many authors) the possibility of a nonstandard definition is implicitly contained in a generally covariant formulation of the special theory of relativity, and it is shown that conditions such as the one they derived are satisfied automatically. The most general position-independent definition of simultaneity is given, and an example of a position- as well as direction-dependent definition is exhibited in an Appendix. A number of objections against the possibility of a nonstandard definition of simultaneity raised by various authors are discussed and are found to lack any physical or mathematical justification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. De Ritis, R., and Guccioni, S. (1985).Gen. Rel. Grav.,17, 595.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mittelstaedt, P. (1977).Found. Phys.,7, 573.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Malament, D. (1977).NOÛS,11, 293.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Torretti, R. (1983).Relativity and Geometry (Pergamon Press, Oxford/New York).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Angel, R. B. (1980).Relativity: The Theory and its Philosophy (Pergamon Press, Oxford/New York).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Friedman, M. (1983).Foundations of Space-Time Theories (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Havas, P. (1964).Rev. Mod. Phys.,36, 938.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Havas, P. (1967). InDelaware Seminar in the Foundations of Physics, M. Bunge, Ed. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin/New York), p. 124.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schouten, J. A. (1918).Verh. Kon. Akad. Amsterdam,12, No. 6.

  10. Hilbert, D. (1917).Gött. Nachr. Math.-Phys. Kl.,53.

  11. Laue, M. (1923).Die Relativitätstheorie, vol. 2, 2nd ed. (F. Vieweg & Sohn, Braunschweig), Section 5 and AnhangII.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Møller, C. (1952).The Theory of Relativity (Oxford University Press, Oxford), Section 88.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fock, V. (1959).The Theory of Space Time and Gravitation, English translation (Pergamon Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fock, V. (1957).Rev. Mod. Phys.,29, 325.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Weyssenhoff, J. (1937).Bull. Acad. Pol., Ser. A,252.

  16. Reichenbach, H. (1924).Axiomatik der relativistischen Raum-Zeit-Lehre (F. Vieweg and Sohn, Braunschweig). (1969). English translation:Axiomatization of the Theory of Relativity (University of California Press, Berkeley/Los Angeles).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Grünbaum, A. (1955).Amer. J. Phys.,23, 450.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Grünbaum, A. (1963).Philosophical Problems of Space and Time (Alfred A. Knopf, New York); (1973) 2nd ed. (Reidel, Dordrecht/Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Einstein, A. (1920).Relativity, the Special and General Theory (Methuen, London).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Grünbaum, A., and Janis, A. I. (1977).Synthese,34, 281.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Eisenhart, L. P. (1926).Riemannian Geometry (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yano, K. (1955).The Theory of Lie Derivatives and its Applications (North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Frank, Ph. (1946).Foundations of Physics (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois); (1955) Reprinted inInternational Encyclopedia of Unified Science (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bunge, M. (1961).Amer. J. Phys.,29, 518.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bunge, M. (1967).Foundations of Physics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mittelstaedt, P. (1976).Der Zeitbegriff in der Physik (Bibliographisches Institut, Mannheim/Wien/Zürich).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ellis, B., and Bowman, P. (1967).Phil. Sci.,34, 116.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Grünbaum, A. (1969).Phil. Sci.,36, 5, (reprinted in [18, 2nd ed.]).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Salmon, W. C. (1969).Phil. Sci.,36, 44.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Havas, P. Simultaneity, conventialism, general covariance, and the special theory of relativity. Gen Relat Gravit 19, 435–453 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00760649

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00760649

Keywords

Navigation