Abstract
Theories of individuation predict systematic differences in argumentative behavior between adolescent girls and their mothers. In order to reveal the nature and functions of this kind of discourse, two studies were carried out on 110 mother-daughter pairs. The second study (n=80) replicated and extended the first study (n=30) on an independent sample. The mother-daughter pairs were asked to discuss a subject that had recently been at issue between them. To assess the argumentative behavior, a category system was developed that reflects the functional character of utterances in discourse. The aim of the research was to test the reliability and validity of the category system. Daughters are assumed to verbalize their own needs and preferences to increase the differences to the mother, and to weaken or reject the mother's arguments in an effort to resist control. Mothers, on the other hand, are supposed to exert control over the behavior of their daughters but do so within bounds of mutuality. This should lead to verbal initiatives and attempts to explain, support and modify their positions and arguments. The data showed high reliability of the categorization of arguments. The categories also differentiated between mothers and daughters. Daughters were more likely to try to weaken and reject (and accept) the mother's arguments and to state preferences while mothers tried to support and explain their positions and to retain control by initiating questions and arguments to which the daughters responded.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bakeman, R., and J.M. Gottman: 1986,Observing Interaction, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, J.: 1969, ‘A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales’,Educational and Psychological Measurement 20, 37–46.
Grotevant, H.D., and C.R. Cooper: 1986, ‘Individuation in Family Relationships,Human Development 29, 82–100.
Gutfleisch-Rieck, I., W. Klein, A. Speck, and T. Spranz-Fogasy: 1989, Transkriptions-vereinbarungen für den Sonderforschungsbereich 245 “Sprechen und Sprachverstehen im sozialen Kontext”, Arbeiten aus dem SFB 245, Bericht Nr. 14, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim.
Hakim-Larson, J., and C.J. Hobart: 1987, ‘Maternal Regulation and Adolescent Autonomy: Mother-Daughter Resolution of Story Conflicts,Journal of Youth and Adolescence 16, 153–166.
Hofer, M., B. Pikowsky, T. Spranz-Fogasy, and T. Fleischmann: 1990, Mannheimer Argumentations Kategorien System (MAKS) für die Auswertung von Argumentationen in Gesprächen zwischen Müttern und jugendlichen Töchtern, Bericht Nr. 22 des Sonderforschungbereiches 245, Heidelberg, Mannheim.
Klein, W.: 1980, ‘Argumentation und Argument’,Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 38, 9–56.
Miller, M.: 1986,Kollektive Lernprozesse, Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.
Mishler, E.: 1975, ‘Studies in Dialogue and Discourse: an Exponential Law of Successive Questioning’,Language in Society 4, 31–51.
Pander Maat, H.: 1985, ‘Argumentation: Zur Charakterisierung und Abgrenzung eines Forschungsgegenstandes’,Studium Linguistik 16, 1–21.
Steinberg, L., and S.B. Silverberg: 1986, ‘The Vicissitudes of Autonomy in Early Adolescence’,Child Development 57, 841–851.
Toulmin, S.: 1958.The Uses of Argument, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Youniss, J., and J. Smollar: 1985,Adolescent Relations with Mothers, Fathers, and Friends, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hofer, M., Pikowsky, B. Validation of a category system for arguments in conflict discourse. Argumentation 7, 135–148 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00710661
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00710661