Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

Performance contracting in Colorado continues to change based on changing system goals and finite resources. An earlier 1986–87 model along with its unresolved issues is linked to recent developments. Currently the areas of primary focus include contracting for specific targeted clients, reviewing the manner in which resources are allocated to mental health centers, and developing and implementing a set of performance indicators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Drucker, P.F. (1974).Management: Tasks, responsibilities, practices. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R.H., Wilson, N.Z. & Foster, M. (1984). Statewide treatment outcome assessment in Colorado: The Colorado Client Assessment Record (CCAR).Community Mental Health Journal, 20, 72–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R.H., Wackwitz, J.H., & Foster, M. (1991). Uses of an empirically derived client typology based on level of functioning: Twelve years of the CCAR.The Journal of Mental Health Administration, 18, 88–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, R.W., Berger, B.L., & Nelson, L.A. (1989). Performance contracting: The Colorado Model.Journal of Mental Health Administration, 16, 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barrett, T.J., Berger, B.L. & Bradley, L.A. Performance contracting: The Colorado model revisited. Adm Policy Ment Health 20, 75–85 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00706074

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00706074

Keywords

Navigation