Abstract
Performance contracting in Colorado continues to change based on changing system goals and finite resources. An earlier 1986–87 model along with its unresolved issues is linked to recent developments. Currently the areas of primary focus include contracting for specific targeted clients, reviewing the manner in which resources are allocated to mental health centers, and developing and implementing a set of performance indicators.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Drucker, P.F. (1974).Management: Tasks, responsibilities, practices. New York: Harper and Row.
Ellis, R.H., Wilson, N.Z. & Foster, M. (1984). Statewide treatment outcome assessment in Colorado: The Colorado Client Assessment Record (CCAR).Community Mental Health Journal, 20, 72–89.
Ellis, R.H., Wackwitz, J.H., & Foster, M. (1991). Uses of an empirically derived client typology based on level of functioning: Twelve years of the CCAR.The Journal of Mental Health Administration, 18, 88–100.
Glover, R.W., Berger, B.L., & Nelson, L.A. (1989). Performance contracting: The Colorado Model.Journal of Mental Health Administration, 16, 21–28.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barrett, T.J., Berger, B.L. & Bradley, L.A. Performance contracting: The Colorado model revisited. Adm Policy Ment Health 20, 75–85 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00706074
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00706074