Skip to main content

Reimbursement: Understanding How We Pay for Health Care

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
An Introduction to Health Policy

Abstract

American health care costs have now grown to encompass 20 % of our gross domestic product, and efforts at slowing this growth have been largely unsuccessful. The need for payment reform is clearly more critical now than ever before. Though payment in the United States has been historically grounded in fee-for-service models, many organizations have begun to test new systems for reimbursement to attempt to curtail spending. In this chapter, we address the history and shortcomings of the fee-for-service model in the United States and describe reforms that have been undertaken to address these issues. Important historical developments described in this chapter include the introduction of diagnosis-related groups by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in the 1980s as well as the rise of strategies including pay for performance, capitation, and nonpayment for preventable complications of care. Models that have been introduced more recently include accountable care organizations (ACOs) and payment bundling. The goals of these emerging models include the following: (1) lowering health care costs, (2) increasing alignment between payment and the provision of quality care, and (3) improving incentives to deliver high quality care. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the effect of payment reform on future physician practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fuchs V. Major trends in the US health economy since 1950. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:973–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jegers M, Kesteloot K, De Graeve D, Gilles W. A typology for provider payment systems in health care. Health Policy. 2002;60(3):255–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Davis K, Collins K, Schoen C, Morris C. Choice matters: enrollees’ views of their health plans. Health Aff. 1995;14(2):99–112.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mechanic RE, Altman SH. Payment reform options: episode payment is a good place to start. Health Aff(Project Hope). 2009;28(2):w262–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Miller H. From volume to value: better ways to pay for health care. Health Aff. 2009;28(5):1418–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Harkin S. Health care, not sick care. Am J Health Promot. 2004;19(1):1–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Luft H, Greenlick M. The contribution of group-and staff-model HMOs to American medicine. Milbank Q. 1996;74(4):445–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Iglehart J. The American health care system: managed care. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:742–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wagner E. Types of managed care organizations. In: Kongstvedt PR, editor. The managed health care handbook. 4th ed. Gaithersburg: Aspen Publishers; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bodenheimer T. The HMO, backlash—righteous or reactionary? N Engl J Med. 1996;335(21):1601–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Morgan R, Virnig B. The Medicare-HMO revolving door—the healthy go in and the sick go out. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(3):169–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Simon S, Pan R. Views of managed care—a survey of students, residents, faculty, and deans at medical schools in the United States. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:928–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Davis M, Burner S. Three decades of Medicare: what the numbers tell us. Health Aff. 1995;14(4):231–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wennberg J. Will payment based on diagnosis-related groups control hospital costs? N Engl J Med. 1984;311(5):295–300.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Altman SH. The lessons of Medicare’s prospective payment system show that the bundled payment program faces challenges. Health Aff (Project Hope). 2012;31(9):1923–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mayes R, Berenson R. Medicare prospective payment and the shaping of US health care. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mistichelli J. Diagnosis related groups (DRGs) and the prospective payment system: forecasting social implications. georgetown.edu [Internet]. [cited 2012 Dec 14]. http://www11.georgetown.edu/research/nrcbl/publications/scopenotes/sn4.pdf

  18. Wald HL, Kramer AM. Nonpayment for harms resulting from medical care: catheter-associated urinary tract infections. JAMA. 2007;298(23):2782–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Calikoglu S, Murray R, Feeney D. Hospital pay-for-performance programs in Maryland produced strong results, including reduced hospital-acquired conditions. Health Aff. 2012;31(12):2649–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lindenauer P, Remus D. Public reporting and pay for performance in hospital quality improvement. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(5):486–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sutton M, Nikolova S, Boaden R. Reduced mortality with hospital pay for performance in England. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(19):1821–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tanenbaum SJ. Pay for performance in Medicare: evidentiary irony and the politics of value. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2009;34(5):717–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ryan AM. Effects of the premier hospital quality incentive demonstration on medicare patient mortality and cost. Health Serv Res. 2009;44(3):821–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Epstein AM. Will pay for performance improve quality of care? The answer is in the details. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(19):1852–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Werner R, Kolstad J, Stuart E, Polsky D. The effect of pay-for-performance in hospitals: lessons for quality improvement. Health Aff. 2011;30:690–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shahian D, Meyer G, Mort E. Association of National Hospital Quality Measure adherence with long-term mortality and readmissions. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(4):325–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Morse RB, Hall M, Fieldston ES, McGwire G, Anspacher M, Sills MR, et al. Hospital-level compliance with asthma care quality measures at children’s hospitals and subsequent asthma-related outcomes. JAMA. 2011;306(13):1454–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Patterson ME, Hernandez AF, Hammill BG, Fonarow GC, Peterson ED, Schulman KA, et al. Process of care performance measures and long-term outcomes in patients hospitalized with heart failure. Med Care. 2010;48(3):210–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rosenthal M. Nonpayment for performance? Medicare’s new reimbursement rule. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(16):1573–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mattie A, Webster B. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’“ Never Events”: an analysis and recommendations to hospitals. Health Care Manag. 2008;27(4):338–49.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lee GM, Kleinman K, Soumerai SB, Tse A, Cole D, Fridkin SK, et al. Effect of nonpayment for preventable infections in U.S. hospitals. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(15):1428–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Addicott R. What accountable care organizations will mean for physicians. BMJ. 2012;345:e6461.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Berwick D. Launching accountable care organizations—the proposed rule for the Medicare shared savings program. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:e32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ginsburg P. Spending to save—ACOs and the Medicare shared savings program. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2085–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Trisolini M, Aggarwal J, Leung M, et al. The Medicare physician group practice demonstration: lessons learned on improving quality and efficiency in health care. [Internet]. The Commonwealth Fund. [cited 2012 Aug 27]. http://www.commonwealthfund.org/Publications/Fund-Reports/2008/Feb/The-Medicare-Physician-Group-Practice-Demonstration--Lessons-Learned-on-Improving-Quality-and-Effici.aspx#citation

  36. Iglehart JK. Assessing an ACO prototype–Medicare’s physician group practice demonstration. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(3):198–200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Berenson R. Health policy brief: next steps for ACOs. 2012 [cited 2012 Dec 12]. http://www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=1001587

  38. Alternative Payment Arrangements for the Pioneer ACO Model. [Internet]. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. [cited 2012 Aug 27]. http://innovations.cms.gov/Files/x/Pioneer-ACO-Model-Alternative-Payment-Arrangements-document.pdf

  39. Hussey P, Ridgely M, Rosenthal M. The PROMETHEUS bundled payment experiment: slow start shows problems in implementing new payment models. Health Aff. 2011;30(11):2116–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Struijs J, Baan C. Integrating care through bundled payments—lessons from the Netherlands. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:990–1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. De Brantes F, Camillus J, Fund C. Evidence-informed case rates: a new health care payment model. Pharm Ther. 2009;34(3):119–23.

    Google Scholar 

  42. McKesson and HCI3 Form Partnership to Support Large-Scale Bundled Payment Programs [Internet]. [cited 2012 Dec 14]. http://www.mckesson.com/en_us/McKesson.com/About%2BUs/Newsroom/Press%2BReleases%2BArchives/2012/McKesson%2Band%2BHCI3%2BForm%2BPartnership%2Bto%2BSupport%2BLarge%2526%252345%253BScale%2BBundled%2BPayment%2BPrograms.html

  43. Mechanic R. Opportunities and challenges for episode-based payment. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(9):777–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sachin H. Jain M.D., M.B.A. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jain, S.H., Besancon, E. (2013). Reimbursement: Understanding How We Pay for Health Care. In: Sethi, M., Frist, W. (eds) An Introduction to Health Policy. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7735-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7735-8_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7734-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7735-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics