Skip to main content
Log in

Evoked potentials in the primary and secondary olfactory projection areas of the forebrain in elasmobranchia

  • Published:
Journal of comparative physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    The pattern of potentials evoked by electrical stimulation of the olfactory mucosa in the olfactory bulb of the shark Scylliorhinus was similar as in other vertebrate groups. The evoked potentials consisted of the incoming volley and two components of the main wave, which were negative at the surface of the central part of the bulb containing the glomerula. Outside of this glomerular area the first component of the main wave was positive (Fig. 1B). In depth recordings the main wave changed polarity in the mitral cell layer (Kg. 3). The latency of the incoming volley corresponded to a conduction velocity of 0.1–0.2 m/sec in the fila olfactoria. These findings can be understood in terms of the anatomical structure of the bulb and are compatible with the theoretical considerations by Rall et al. (1968).

  2. 2.

    Secondary olfactory potentials could be evoked in the forebrain after electrical stimulation of the nasal mucosa and the olfactory bulb in Scylliorhinus (Fig. 1E, S) and after electrical stimulation of the olfactory tract in Torpedo (Fig. 5B, S). Their latencies corresponded to a conduction velocity of 1–2 m/sec in the fibres of the olfactory tract. The potentials consisted of a surface negative wave restricted to a small lateral area of the ipsilateral forebrain (Fig. 5). The preceding incoming volley of the lateral olfactory tract was seen only in Torpedo after stimulation of the olfactory tract when it was not masqued by the simultaneous spread potential from the olfactory bulb.

  3. 3.

    Olfactory potentials of higher order could be evoked outside the secondary olfactory area of the forebrain (Figs. 1E,t; 5B, 5–10). The negative wave elicited about 20 msec after the secondary olfactory potential by bulbar stimulation appeared to be a tertiary olfactory potential; it showed complete fatigue with very low stimulus frequencies and was restricted to the caudal part of the ipsilateral forebrain. Late potentials with latencies up to 800 msec and regular EEG-synchronous afterpotentials were observed but not studied in detail.

  4. 4.

    The present findings are consistent with the view that the olfactory bulb has a very uniform and conservative structure and neuronal circuitry in all vertebrate groups. The secondary olfactory area of the forebrain hemispheres is much more restricted than concluded from older anatomical work. This result, supported by new anatomical work of Ebbesson et al. (1970), shows the existence of a comparable gross structure of the forebrain in elasmobranchs and higher vertebrates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bruckmoser, P.: Elektrische Antworten im Vorderhirn vonLampetra fluviatilis (L.) bei Reizung des Nervus olfactorius. Z. vergl. Physiol.75, 69 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruckmoser, P.: Beziehungen zwischen Struktur und Punktion in der Evolution des Telencephalon. Verh. dtsch. zool. Ges.66, 219 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbesson, S. O. E., Heimer, L.: Projections of the olfactory tract fibres in the nurse shark (Ginglymostoma cirratum) Brain Bes.17, 47 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbesson, S. O. E., Heimer, L.: New insights into the organization of the shark brain. Comp. Bioehem. Physiol.42A, 121 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Graeber, R. C., Ebbesson, S. O. E., Jane, J. A.: Visual discrimination in sharks without optic tectum. Science180, 413 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heimer, L.: The secondary olfactory connections in mammals, reptiles and sharks. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.167, 129 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, S. E.: Die Hauptkomponente der evozierten Potentiale im Bulbus olfactorius des Frosches (russ.). Dokl. Akad. Nauk USSR190, 729 (1970b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwenhuys, R.: Comparative anatomy of olfactory centres and tracts. Progress in brain research vol. 23, 1. ed. Amsterdam: Y. Zottermann 1967

    Google Scholar 

  • Rall, W., Shepherd, G. M.: Theoretical reconstruction of fieldpotentials and dendrodendritic synaptic interactions in olfactory bulb. J. Neurophysiol.31, 884 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

With the aid of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. (Br 274/2).

Supported by a grant from Stiftung Volkswagen-Werk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bruckmoser, P., Dieringer, N. Evoked potentials in the primary and secondary olfactory projection areas of the forebrain in elasmobranchia. J. Comp. Physiol. 87, 65–74 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00699296

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00699296

Keywords

Navigation