Abstract
The Orange Juice Experiment, consisting of 23 items of varying degrees of complexity bearing on the concept of ratio, was given to subjects between 6 and 16 years. Stages had been differentiated through statistical analysis and described in Part I of this paper. These stages had been interpreted in terms of the Genevan scale of development. In Part II, given here, the strategies applied at each stage are first analysed, and a second order analysis made to determine the possible processes for passing from one stage to another. A process of “adaptive restructuring” finally evolved, bearing on two periods of development—construction of the ratio concept, and construction of the Common Denominator algorithm.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Freudenthal, H. 1978:Weeding and Sowing: Preface to a Science of Mathematical Education, D. Reide, Dordrecht.
Freudenthal, H., Janssen, G. M. and Sweers, W. J. (eds.) 1976: “Five years IOWO,Educational Studies in Mathematics,1–2, 189–367.
Herron, J. D. and Wheatley, G. H. 1978: “A unit factor method for solving proportion problems”,The Mathematics Teacher 71, 18–21.
Noelting, G. 1980: “The development of proportional reasoning and the ratio concept (the Orange Juice Experiment). Part I: The determination of stages”,Educational Studies in Mathematics 11, 217–253.
Piaget, J. 1972:Essai de Logique Opératoire, Dunod, Paris.
Piaget, J. 1975:L'équilibration des structures cognitives, problème central du développement, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris. Translated as:The Development of Thought, Viking Press, New York, 1977.
Van den Brink, J. and Streefland, L. 1979: “Young children (6–8)—Ratio and proportion”,Educational Studies in Mathematics 10, 403–420.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Noelting, G. The development of proportional reasoning and the ratio concept Part II—problem-structure at successive stages; problem-solving strategies and the mechanism of adaptive restructuring. Educ Stud Math 11, 331–363 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00697744
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00697744