Skip to main content
Log in

Investigating errors of beginning mathematicians

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Diagnostic interviews were conducted with children in their third year at a Melbourne primary school to determine why they had made errors on sixteen arithmetical tasks. The Newman method of analyzing errors was modified in order that the children's errors could be sensibly classified in terms of the sequence of steps they used when attempting to solve the problems. The diagnostic interviews clearly showed where children were making their errors, and this enabled their teacher to devise more appropriate teaching procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Clements, M. A.: 1980, ‘Analyzing children's errors on written mathematical tasks’,Educational Studies in Mathematics 11, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. B.: 1973, ‘Two special aspects of mathematics laboratories and individualization: Papert's projects and Piagetian interviews’, in J. L. Higgins (ed.),Cognitive Psychology and the Mathematics Lab, ERIC/SMEAC, Information Analysis Center for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, pp. 21–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, W. H.: 1964,Evaluating Pupils' Understanding of Arithmetic, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glennon, V. J. and Wilson, J. W.: 1975, ‘Diagnostic-prescriptive teaching’, inThe Slow Learner in Mathematics, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, Virginia, pp. 282–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, K.: 1965, ‘A linguistic study of cues and miscues in reading’,Elementary English, October, pp. 639–643.

  • Goodman, K.: 1969, ‘Analysis of oral reading miscues: Applied psycholinguistics’,Reading Research Quarterly 5, 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, S. K.: 1978, ‘A literature review: Thought processes involved in the solution of verbal arithmetic problems’,School Science and Mathematics 78, 327–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankford, F. G.: 1974, ‘What can a teacher learn about a pupil's thinking through oral interviews?’,Arithmetic Teacher 21, 26–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. A.: 1977, ‘An analysis of sixth-grade pupils' errors on written mathematical tasks’, in M. A. Clements, and J. Foyster (eds.),Research in Mathematics Education in Australia, Vol. 1, Melbourne, pp. 239–258.

  • Suydam, M. N.: 1974,Evaluation in the Mathematics Classroom, ERIC Information Analysis Center for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Science, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Watson, I. Investigating errors of beginning mathematicians. Educ Stud Math 11, 319–329 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00697743

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00697743

Keywords

Navigation