Skip to main content
Log in

Direction ofE for maximum response of a retinula cell

  • Published:
Journal of comparative physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Except for very special fused rhabdoms, e. g. those with orthogonal microvilli like the worker bee, the direction of the electric vector E of linear polarized light necessary for a maximum response from a retinula cell is not parallel (or perpendicular) to the microvilli of the recorded cell.

This is because the rhabdomeres of a fused rhabdom are optically coupled, i. e. the properties of each rhabdomere influence the manner in which light is transmitted down the composite rhabdom structure.

A rhabdom is analogous to a non-uniform absorbing optical crystal. Such a crystal has two coordinate (optical) axes along which E remains linear polarized as it propagates. Only when the microvilli of the recorded cell are parallel to one of these axes will the direction ofE for maximum retinula cell response be parallel to the microvilli.

The locust-type of rhabdom is used as an example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Born, M., Wolf, E.L.: Principles of optics, chap. 7. New York: Pergamon Press 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horridge, G.A.: The retina of the locust. In: The functional organization of the compound eye, C. G. Bernhard, Ed. Oxford: Pergamon Press 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschfeld, K.: Absorption properties of photopigments in single rods, cones and rhabdoms. In: Processing of optical data by organism and by machines. New York: Academic Press 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seitz, G.: Polarisationsoptische Untersuchungen am Auge vonCalliphora erythocephale (Meig.). Z. Zellforsch.93, 525–529 (1969).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, S.R.: Interreceptor coupling in ommatidia of drone honeybee and locust compound eyes. Vision Res.9, 999–1029 (1969a).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, S.R.: Sense cell structure and interspecies comparisons of polarized light absorption in arthropod compound eyes. Vision Res.9, 1031–1041 (1969b).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, A. W.: Polarization sensitivity of individual retinula cells, J. comp. Physiol.83, 331–360 (1973a).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, A. W.: Light absorption in visual photoreceptors. J. opt. Soc. Amer. (submitted) (1973b).

  • Snyder, A.W., Menzel, R., Laughlin, S.B.: Polarization and spectral sensitivity of retinula cells of a fused rhabdom — consequences of optical and electrical coupling. J. comp. Physiol. (to be submitted).

  • Weale, R.A.: On the birefringence of rods and cones. Pflügers Arch.329, 244–257 (1971).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Snyder, A.W., Sammut, R. Direction ofE for maximum response of a retinula cell. J. Comp. Physiol. 85, 37–45 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00694139

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00694139

Keywords

Navigation