Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil with brequinar: results of a phase I study

  • Original Article
  • Brequinar, 5-Fluorouraci Biochemical Modulation
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biochemical modulation can increase the efficacy of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Pizzorno et al. have previously shown that brequinar, a de novo pyrimidine synthesis inhibitor, enhances the antitumor effect of 5-FU in vivo [Cancer Res 52: 1660–1665, 1992]. On the basis of their data, we conducted a phase I study of brequinar in combination with 5-FU in patients with refractory solid tumors. The initial dose (100 mg/m2) of brequinar was raised in 100-mg/m2 increments in cohorts of three assessable patients. The initial dose of 5-FU was 500 mg/m2, but escalation was allowed in patients who showed no significant toxic reaction. Brequinar was administered over 1 h and 5-FU over 2 h starting 18–20 h after the initiation of infusion of brequinar. Treatments were repeated weekly. Responses were evaluated after 4 weeks (one course) and then every 8 weeks thereafter. Pharmacokinetics of brequinar and determination of plasma uridine levels were performed in at least three patients at each dose level. Of the 25 patients registered in the study, 21 were assessable for toxicity studies. The dose of brequinar was escalated up to 600 mg/m2. In addition, the dose of 5-FU was increased to 600 mg/m2 as a result of a lack of a significant toxic reaction in the first nine patients. No objective responses were observed. One patient developed grade 3 stomatitis, and one developed grade 3 esophagitis at the 400 and 600 mg/m2 dose of brequinar, respectively. Brequinar produced a dosedependent decrease in plasma uridine levels at doses up to 500 mg/m2. No additional decrease in plasma uridine occurred with higher doses of brequinar, thus suggesting a plateau effect. This observation prompted us to terminate the study before reaching the maximum tolerated dose of brequinar. Our data indicate that brequinar in doses≥400 mg/m2 results in significant biochemical modulation. The lack of toxicity seen at these doses of brequinar suggests that the initial dose of the effector agent 5-FU should be increased in future studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

5-FU :

5-Fluorouracil

PALA :

N-(phosphonacetyl)-l-aspartic acid

UXP :

total uridine nucleotide

AGC :

absolute granulocyte count

MTD :

maximum tolerated dose

ECOG :

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

References

  1. Leyland-Jones B, O'Dwyer P (1986) Biochemical modulation: application of laboratory models to the clinic. Cancer Treat Rep 70:219

    Google Scholar 

  2. Martin D, Stolfi R, Sawyer R, Young C (1985) Application of biochemical modulation with a therapeutically inactive modulating agent in clinical trials of cancer chemotherapy. Cancer Treat Rep 69:421

    Google Scholar 

  3. Darnowsky J, Handschumacher R (1989) Enhancement of fluorouracil therapy by manipulation of tissue uridine pools. Pharmacol Ther 41:381

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ardalan B, Singh G, Silberman H (1988) A randomized phase I and II study of short-term infusion of high-dose fluorouracil with or withoutN-(phosphoacetyl)-L-aspartic acid in patients with advanced pancreatic and colorectal cancers. J Clin Oncol 6:1053

    Google Scholar 

  5. O'Dwyer P, Paul A, Walczak J, Weiner L, Litwin S, Comis R (1990) Phase II study of biochemical modulation of fluorouracil by low-dose PALA in patients with colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 8:1497

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dexter D, Hesson D, Ardecky R, Rao G, Tippett D, Dusak B, et al (1985) Activity of a novel 4-quinolinecarboxylic acid: NSC 368390 [6-fluoro-2-(2′-fluor-1,1′-biphenyl-4-yl)-3-methyl-4-quinolinecarboxylic acid sodium salt against experimental tumors. Cancer Res 45:5563

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen S, Ruben R, Dexter D (1986) Mechanism of action of the novel anticancer agent 6-fluoro-2-(2′-fluor-1,1′-biphenyl-4-yl)-3-methyl-4-quinolinecarboxylic acid sodium salt (NSC 368390): inhibition of de novo pyrimidine nucleotide biosynthesis. Cancer Res 46:5014

    Google Scholar 

  8. Peters G, Sharma S, Laurensse E, Pinedo H (1987) Inhibition of pyrimidine de novo synthesis by DuP 785 (NSC 368390). Invest New Drugs 5:235

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen S, Perella F, Behrens D, Papp L (1992) Inhibition of dihydroorotate dehydrogenase by brequinar sodium. Cancer Res 52:3521

    Google Scholar 

  10. Peters G, Schwartsmann G, Nadal J, Laurensse E, van Groeningen, C, van der Vijgh W, et al (1990) In vivo inhibition of the pyrimidine de novo enzyme dihydroorotic acid dehydrogenase by brequinar sodium (DUP-785; NSC 368390) in mice and patients. Cancer Res 50:4644

    Google Scholar 

  11. Peters G, Nadal J, Laurensse E, de Kant E, Pinedo H (1990) Retention of in vivo antipyrimidine effects of brequinar sodium (DUP-785; NSC 368390) in murine liver, bone marrow and colon cancer. Biochem Pharmacol 39:135

    Google Scholar 

  12. Moore M, Robert F, Cripps M, Ruckdeschel J, Neidhart J, Natale R, et al (1991) A phase II study of brequinar sodium (DUP 785, NSC 368390) in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers (CA). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 10:152

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pizzorno G, Wiegand R, Lentz S, Handschumacher R (1992) Brequinar potentiates 5-fluorouracil antitumor activity in a murine model colon 38 tumor by tissue-specific modulation of uridine nucleotide pools. Cancer Res 52:1160

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bork E, Vest S, Hansen H (1989) A phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of brequinar sodium, DUP 785 (NSC 368390), using a weekly and a biweekly schedule. Eur J Clin Oncol 25:1403

    Google Scholar 

  15. Oken M, Creech R, Tormey D, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, et al (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 5:649

    Google Scholar 

  16. Arteaga C, Brown T, Kuhn J, Shen H, O'Rourke J, Beougher K, et al (1989) Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic trial of sodium (DUP 785; NSC 368390). Cancer Res 49:4648

    Google Scholar 

  17. Darnowsky J, Handschumacher R (1985) Tissue specific enhancement of uridine utilization and 5-fluorouracil therapy in mice by benzylacyclouridine. Cancer Res 45:5364

    Google Scholar 

  18. Grem J, King S, O'Dwyer P, Leyland-Jones B (1988) Biochemistry and clinical activity ofN-(phosphonacetyl)-L-aspartate: a review. Cancer Res 48:4441

    Google Scholar 

  19. Martin D, Stolfi R, Sawyer R, Spiegelman S, Casper E, Young C (1983) Therapeutic utility of utilizing low doses ofN-(phosphonacetyl)-L-aspartic acid in combination with 5-fluorouracil: a murine study with clinical relevance. Cancer Res 43:2317

    Google Scholar 

  20. Peters G, Kraal I, Pinedo H (1982) In vitro and in vivo studies on the combination of brequinar sodium (DUP-785; NSC 368390) with 5-fluorouracil; effects of uridine. Br J Cancer 65: 229

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buzaid, A.C., Pizzorno, G., Marsh, J.C. et al. Biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil with brequinar: results of a phase I study. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 36, 373–378 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00686185

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00686185

Key words

Navigation