Skip to main content
Log in

Bond distances and bond angles of the C10 skeleton in naphthalene derivatives as hard bond parameters:35Cl NQR and structure of 1,8-diaminonaphthalene · Cl2HCCOOH, 1,8-diaminonaphthalene · Cl3CCOOH, 1-aminonaphthalene · Cl3CCOOH, and 1,8-diaminonaphthalene

  • Published:
Structural Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The structures of several naphthalene derivatives and their35Cl NQR spectra have been investigated. 1,8-Diaminonaphthalene,C 92v -Pna2 1, Z = 8,a (in pm) = 881,b = 1577,c = 1213; 1,8-diaminonaphthalene monodichloroacetate,C 62h -C2/c, Z = 8,a = 2050,b = 584,c = 2333,β (in degrees) = 110.1; 1,8-diaminonaphthalene monotrichloroacetate,C 11 -P¯1, Z=2,a=1211,b=1062,c=589,α=74.8,β=80.1,γ=70.9; 1-aminonaphthalene trichloroacetate,D 152h -Pbca, Z=8,a=2347,b=1289,c=889. The35Cl NQR spectrum of 1,8-diaminonaphthalene monodichloroacetate is a doublet, the frequencies decreasing with increasing temperature from 77 to 217 K at which temperatureT b the NQR signals bleach out. A35Cl NQR triplet is found for 1,8-diaminonaphthalene monotrichloracetate in the range 77 ≤ 77K ≤ 207 (=T b ). 1-Amino-naphthalene trichloroacetate shows a35Cl NQR triplet, too, withT b = 136 K. Characteristic for the intermolecular interactions are hydrogen bonds in the chloroacetic acid salts; each NH3 group forms three hydrogen bonds, and of the two oxygens one is involved in two such bonds, one in one bond. Thereby units of two cations and two anions are formed, and these dirners are connected to strings by hydrogen bonds. Additional van der Waals interactions between the chlorine atoms and the naphthalene ring system are observed. Comparison of the intramolecular bond distances C(i)-C(j) of the C10 naphthalene skeleton for 41 naphthalene derivatives (present data and literature) shows that the bond distances C(i)-C(j)are little influenced by substitution, as is the mean bond length. Shorter and longer distances prove a partial localization of charge at C(1)-C(2), C(3)-C(4), C(5)-C(6), and C(7)-C(8). Regularities within the bond angles and characteristic influences of 1,8-disubstitution on it are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Biedenkapp, D.; Weiss, Al.Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 1966,70, 788.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fichtner, W.; Marckworth, A.; Weiden, N.; Weiss, Al. Z.Naturforsch.,1986,41a, 215.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Marckworth, A.; Weiden, N.; Weiss, Al.Ber Bunsenges Phys. Chem. 1987,91, 1158.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Basaran, R.; Dou, S.-Q.; Weiss, Al.Ber Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 1991,95, 46.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Basaran, R.; Dou, S.-q.; Weiss, Al. Z.Naturforsch,1992,47a, 241.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Marckworth, A.; Paulus, H.; Weiden, N.; Weiss, Al. ZPhys. Chem. (Frankfurt) 1991,173, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Basaran, R.; Dou, S.-q.; Weiss, Al.Ber Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 1992,96, 35.

    Google Scholar 

  8. de Aguiar, A.Ber. Deutsch. Chem. Ges. 1870,3, 27. Ekstrand, A. G.J. Prakt. Chem. 1888,38, 241.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXS86, Program for crystal structure solution, University of Göttingen, Germany, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sheldrick, G. M. SHELX76, Program for crystal structure determination. University of Cambridge, England, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bayer, H.Z Phys. 1951,130, 227.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Krygowski, T. M. InProgress in Physics and Organic Chemistry; Taft, R. W. Ed.1990,17, 239.

  13. Bühl, M.; Steinke, T.; von Raqué Schleyer, P.; Boese, R..Angew. Chem. 1991,103, 1179.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Einspahr, H.; Robert, J.-B; Marsh, R. E.; Roberts, J. D.Acta Crystallogr.,1973,29, 1611.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Herbstein, F. H.Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B 1979,35, 1661.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sim, G. A.Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B 1982,38, 623.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Evrad, G.; Piret, P.; van Meersche, M.Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B 1972,28, 497.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cruickshank, D. W. J.,Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B 1957,10, 504.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pawley, G. S.; Yeats, E. A.Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B 1969,25, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wong-Ng, W.; Nyburg, S. C., Awwal, A.; Jankie, R.; Kresge, A.J. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B 1982,38, 559.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Robert, J.-B.; Sherfinski, J. S.; Marsh, R. E.; Roberts, J. D.J. Org. Chem. 1974,39, 1152.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Banerjee, A.; Brown, C.J. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C 1985,41, 82.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Foss, L. I.; Syed, A.; Stevens, E. D.; Klein, C. L.Acta Crystallogr, Sect. C 1984,40, 272.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bush, B. F.; Lynch, V. M.; Lagowski, J.J. Organometallics 1987,6, 1267, Kündig, E. P.; Perret, C; Spichiger, S.; Bernadinelli, G.J. Organomet. Chem. 1985,286, 183.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Meresse, A.; Courseille, C.; Leroy, F.; Chanh, N. B.Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B 1975,31, 1236.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bright, D.; Maxwell, I. E.; de Boer, J.J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1973, 2101.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sooriyakumaran, R.; Boudjouk, P.; Garvey, R. G.Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C 1985,41, 1348.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Blount, J. F.; Cozzi, F.; Damewood, Jr., J. R.; Iroff, L. D.; Sjöstrand, U.; Mislow, K.J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980,102, 99.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Schweizer, W. B.; Procter, G.; Kaftory, M.; Dunitz, J. D.Helv. Chim. Acta 1978,61, 2783.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jameson, M. B.; Penfold, B. R.J. Chem. Soc. (London) 1965, 528.

  31. Gafner, G.; Herbstein, F. H.Acta Crystallogr.,1962,15, 1081.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Born, L.; Heywang, G. Z.Kristallogr. 1990,190, 147.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nagawa, Y.; Goto, M.; Honda, K.; Nakanishi, H.Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1988,61, 3553.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Handal, J.; White, J. G.; Franck, R. W.; Yuh, Y. H.; Allinger, N. L.J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977,99, 3345.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rajan, S. S.Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B 1978,34, 998.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yagi, E.; Ohashi, Y.; Ishige, M.; Maeda, K.Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C 1989,45, 1109.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kuroda, R.; Mason, S. F.J. Chem. Soc. Perkin II 1981, 167.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Gali, S.; Solans, X; Miravitlles, C; Font-Altaba, M.Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B 1978,34, 1011.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe, Gesellschaft für wissenschaftlich-technische Information mbH, D-76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen 2, Germany.

  40. Wigand, S.; Weiden, N.; Weiss, Al.Z Naturforsch., A 1990,45, 490.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Pratt-Brock, C. Dunitz, J. D.Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B 1982,38, 2218.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Cox, E. G.Rev. Mod. Phys. 1958,30, 159.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Basaran, R., Dou, Sq. & Weiss, A. Bond distances and bond angles of the C10 skeleton in naphthalene derivatives as hard bond parameters:35Cl NQR and structure of 1,8-diaminonaphthalene · Cl2HCCOOH, 1,8-diaminonaphthalene · Cl3CCOOH, 1-aminonaphthalene · Cl3CCOOH, and 1,8-diaminonaphthalene. Struct Chem 4, 219–233 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00673697

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00673697

Key words

Navigation