Abstract
The study of boundary effects initiated in a previous paper is continued. New assumptions regarding the geometrical structure of the boundary surface are introduced. Under these assumptions, it is shown that macroscopic Neumann conditions do not generally affect the determination of the macroscopic field in the case of the transport process considered — heat conduction. For this type of boundary condition, the boundary effect is generally confined within a thin layer near the boundary. When heat sources are taken into account within the porous domain, the result is different. In this case, making use of a Neumann boundary condition, expressed in terms of macroscopic variables, amounts to introducing an extra flux. Under normal circumstances, however, this additional flux is negligible.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- A :
-
cross-sectional area of a unit cell
- A e :
-
cross-sectional area of a unit cell at the boundary surface
- A sf :
-
interfacial area of the s-f interface contained within the averaging volume
- \(\mathbb{A}_\upsilon\) :
-
surface area per unit volume (A sf/\(\mathbb{V}\))
- A sf :
-
interfacial area of the s-f interface contained within the macroscopic system
- g:
-
closure vector
- h:
-
closure vector
- k:
-
heat transfer coefficient at the s-f interface
- Keff :
-
effective thermal conductivity tensor
- ℓ x :
-
unit cell length
- n:
-
unit vector
- ne :
-
outwardly directed unit normal vector at the boundary
- nsf :
-
outwardly directed unit normal vector for thes-phase at f-s interface
- q:
-
heat flux density
- T * :
-
macroscopic temperature defined by the macroscopic problem
- s :
-
closure variable
- V :
-
volume of the macroscopic system
- ∂V :
-
boundary surface of the macroscopic domain
- ∂V 1 :
-
macroscopic sub-surface of the boundary surface
- x :
-
local coordinate
- εs,f :
-
volume fraction
- λs, glf :
-
microscopic thermal conductivities
- θ:
-
‘true’ microscopic temperature
- θ* :
-
microscopic temperature corresponding toT *
- \(\hat \theta\) :
-
microscopic error temperature
- ζ:
-
vector defined by Equation (34)
- < >:
-
spatial average
References
Auriault, J. L. and Bonnet, G., 1987, Surface effect in composite materials: two simples examples,Int. J. Engng. Sci. 25(3), 307–323.
Bear J. and Verruijt, A., 1987,Modelling Groundwater Flow and Pollution, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Bourgeat, A., Quintard, M., and Whitaker, S., 1988, Elément de comparaison entre la méthode d'homogenisation et la méthode de prise de moyenne avec fermeture,CRAS 306, Serie II, 463–466.
Crapiste, G. H., Rotstein, E., and Whitaker, S., 1986, A general closure scheme for the method of the volume averaging,Chem. Engng. Sci. 41, 227–235.
Ene, I. and Sanchez-Palencia, E., 1975, Equations et phénomenes de surface pour l'écoulement dans un modéle de milieu poreux.J. Mec. Theor. Appl. 14(1), 73–108.
Hassanizadeh, S. M. and Gray, W., 1989, Boundary and interface conditions in porous media,Water Resour. Res. 25(7), 1705–1715.
Nozad, I., Carbonell, R. G., and Whitaker, S., 1985, Heat conduction in multiphase systems I: Theory and experiment for two-phase systems,Chem. Engng. Sci. 40, 843–855.
Prat, M., 1989, On the boundary conditions at the macroscopic level,Transport in Porous Media 4, 259–280.
Ryan, D., Carbonell, R. G., and Whitaker, S., 1981, A theory of diffusion and reaction in porous media, in P. Stroeve and W. J. Ward (eds),AICHE Symposium Series No. 202, Vol. 77, pp. 46–62.
Sanchez-Palencia, E., 1980,Non-homogeneous Media and Vibration Theory, Springer, Berlin.
Whitaker, S., 1986, Transport processes with heterogeneous reaction, in S. Whitaker and A. E. Cassano (eds),Concepts and Design of Chemical Reactors, Gordon and Breach, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Prat, M. Some refinements concerning the boundary conditions at the macroscopic level. Transp Porous Med 7, 147–161 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00647394
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00647394