Skip to main content
Log in

A new type of water vibration receptor on the crayfish antenna

II. Model of receptor function

  • Published:
Journal of comparative physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    The flagellum of the second antenna of the crayfishAstacus leptodactylus has two main types of sensory hairs, normal erect hairs and procumbent hairs, which bridge the junction between adjacent segments of the flagellum (Tautz et al. 1981). The upright hairs respond to particle motion or touch, and the procumbent hairs to bending of the flagellar articulation that they span.

  2. 2.

    Their mode of excitation suggests that the procumbent hairs might be able to detect and perhaps also locate nearby moving objects by the underwater disturbances they create. To test this idea we have developed a mathematical model that predicts the stimulation of the procumbent hairs produced by sources of different types, strengths, frequencies and axes of vibration. The model has been tested by measuring underwater antenna motion in response to a dipole source (a vibrating sphere) using laser Doppler vibrometry. The model appears to be adequate up to ∼ 30 Hz.

  3. 3.

    We have also used a second model, based on the work of Fletcher (1978), to predict the stimulation of the upright hairs. Comparison of results from the two models suggests that the procumbent hairs generally have a larger “receptive field”, particularly beyond the tips of the antennae. The procumbent hairs may also be less affected by random background stimulation than upright hairs and would not be influenced by eddies or turbulence created by water flowing across the antennae.

  4. 4.

    Based on our model of antenna bending and on previous neurophysiological work, the angular response threshold of procumbent hair sensilla may be <0.0003 ° at their best frequency. Thus the procumbent hair sensilla should be capable of detecting fish large enough to be potential predators at least 20 cm away.

  5. 5.

    It is possible that a crayfish, by analyzing the pattern of stimulation produced by a source of underwater disturbances, might also be able to determine its location, restricting its position to within a certain Probable Location Region (PLR). The size and location of PLRs is affected only slightly by the source strength and frequency of vibration, but differences in source type and axis of vibration increase the size of the PLR of an unknown source. A crayfish might also determine the approximate direction to a source by moving its antennae and monitoring the change in procumbent hair stimulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

LDV :

laser Doppler vibrometry

PLR :

probable location region

References

  • Bergeijk WA van (1964) Directional and nondirectional hearing in fish. In: Tavolga WN (ed) Marine bioacoustics. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 281–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Chichibu S (1978) Response patterns and direction sensitivities of the crayfish setae units. Acta Med Kinki Univ 3:177–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Chichibu S, Wada T, Komiya H, Suzuki K (1978) Structure of mechanoreceptive hairs on the crayfish first antenna. Acta Med Kinki Univ 3:27–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremer L, Hedd M, Ungar EE (1973) Structureborne sound. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher N (1978) Acoustic response of hair receptors in insects. J Comp Physiol 127:185–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris GG (1964) Considerations on the physics of sound production by fishes. In: Tavolga WN (ed) Marine bioacoustics. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 233–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris GG, Bergeijk WA van (1962) Evidence that the lateral line organ responds to near-field displacements of sources in water. J Acoust Soc Am 34:1831–1841

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsler LE, Frey AR (1962) Fundamentals of acoustics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Laverack MS (1964) The antennular sense organs ofPanulirus argus. Comp Biochem Physiol 13:301–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Main IG (1978) Vibration and waves in physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters WM, Markl H (1981) Vibration signal transmission in spider orbwebs. Science 213:363–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellon D (1963) Electrical responses from dually innervated tactile receptors on the thorax of the crayfish. J Exp Biol 40:137–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelsen A, Larsen ON (1978) Biophysics of the ensiferan ear. I. Tympanal vibrations in bushcrickets (Tettigoniidae) studied with laser vibrometry. J Comp Physiol 123:193–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse PM (1948) Vibration and sound, 2nd edn. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Solon MH, Kass-Simon G (1981) Mechanosensory activity of hair organs on the chelae ofHomarus americanus. Comp Biochem Physiol [A] 68:217–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Tautz J (1977) Reception of medium vibration by thoracal hairs of caterpillars ofBarathra brassicae L. (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) I. Mechanical properties of the receptor hairs. J Comp Physiol 118:13–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Tautz J (1979) Reception of particle oscillation in a medium — an unorthodox sensory capacity. Naturwissenschaften 66:452–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Tautz J, Masters WM, Aicher B, Markl H (1981) A new type of water vibration receptor on the crayfish antenna. I. Sensory physiology. J Comp Physiol 144:533–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor RC (1968) Water-vibration reception: A neurophysiological study in unrestrained crayfish. Comp Biochem Physiol 27:795–805

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor RC (1975) Physical and physiological properties of the crayfish antennal flagellum. J Neurobiol 6:501–519

    Google Scholar 

  • Tazaki K (1977) Nervous responses from mechanosensory hairs on the antennal flagellum of the lobsterHomarus gammarus (L.). Mar Behav Physiol 5:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Tazaki K, Ohnishi M (1974) Responses from tactile receptors in the antenna of the spiny lobsterPanulirus japonicus. Comp Biochem Physiol [A] 47:1323–1327

    Google Scholar 

  • Tritton DJ (1977) Physical fluid dynamics. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedel JP, Clarac F (1976) Hydrodynamic sensitivity by cuticular organs in the rock lobsterPanulirus vulgaris. Mar Behav Physiol 3:235–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiese K (1976) Mechanoreceptors for near-field water displacement in crayfish. J Neurophysiol 39:816–833

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyse GA, Maynard DM (1965) Joint receptors in the antennule ofPanulirus argus Latreille. J Exp Biol 42:521–535

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dedicated to Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. H. Autrum on the occasion of his 75th birthday

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Masters, W.M., Aicher, B., Tautz, J. et al. A new type of water vibration receptor on the crayfish antenna. J. Comp. Physiol. 149, 409–422 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00619156

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00619156

Keywords

Navigation