Skip to main content
Log in

The rôle of retinula cell types in visual behavior ofDrosophila melanogaster

  • Published:
Journal of comparative physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We propose that inDrosophila melanogaster the optomotor response to both horizontal and vertical movement is mediated predominantly by the 6 large retinula cells (R1–6) in each facet of the compound eye. Evidence is presented which indicates that this may also be true for most of the other visual responses which at present can be quantitatively studied. These responses include visually controlled landing, pattern-induced orientation of flying and walking animals, the abnormal jump reflex of the mutant Hk1 (Kaplan, 1976) and probably also phototaxis. The only function for which the small retinula cells R7 and/or R8 seem to be required so far is spectral wavelength discrimination in phototaxis at high light intensity. Our hypothesis is based on studies of the receptor deficient mutantssevenless, outer rhabdomeres absent andreceptor degeneration B as well as on results of bleaching experiments by which the retinula cells R1–6 of the eye color mutantwhite can be reversibly blocked.

Visual performance of wild typeDrosophila in the optomotor response reflects receptor properties (visual acuity, spectral sensitivity and polarization sensitivity) expected for the R1–6 receptor subsystem. The notion of a ‘high sensitivity’ and a ‘high acuity’ state which was proposed earlier on the basis of experiments on various visual mutants is in agreement with the present results but their interpretation as reflecting properties of different receptor subsystems must be abandoned. Experimental data on wild type also suggest the existence of such an adaptational mechanism; this, however, remains to be demonstrated more conclusively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnett, D.W.: Spatial and temporal integration properties of units in first optic ganglion of Dipterans. J. Neurophysiol.35, 429–444 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertholf, L.M.: The extent of the spectrum forDrosophila and the distribution of stimulative efficiency in it. Z. vergl. Physiol.18, 32–64 (1933)

    Google Scholar 

  • Braitenberg, V., Hauser-Holschuh, H.: Patterns of projection in the visual system of the fly. II. Quantitative aspects of second order neurons in relation to models of movement perception. Exp. Brain Res.16, 184–209 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchner, E.: Elementary movement detectors in an insect visual system. Biol. Cybernetics24, 85–101 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosens, D.J., Briscoe, D.: A switch phenomenon in the compound eye of the white-eyed mutant ofDrosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol.18, 627–632 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, H.: Die spektrale Empfindlichkeit des Komplexauges vonMusca. Kybernetik9, 145–156 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, H.: Optomotorische Untersuchungen am visuellen System der StubenfliegeMusca domestica L. Kybernetik14, 1–23 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Franceschini, N.: Sampling of the visual environment by the compound eye of the fly: fundamentals and applications. In: Photoreceptor optics (eds. A.W. Snyder, R. Menzel), pp. 98–125. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1975

    Google Scholar 

  • Franceschini, N., Kirschfeld, K.: Etude optique in vivo des éléments photorécepteurs dans l'oeil composé deDrosophila. Kybernetik8, 1–13 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Götz, K.G.: Optomotorische Untersuchungen des visuellen Systems einiger Augenmutanten der FruchtfliegeDrosophila. Kybernetik2, 77–92 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • Götz, K.G.: Flight control inDrosophila by visual perception of motion. Kybernetik4, 199–208 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, W.A., Stark, W.S., Walker, J.A.: Genetic dissection of the photoreceptor system in the compound eye ofDrosophila melanogaster. J. Physiol. (Lond.)256, 415–439 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser-Holschuh, H.: Vergleichende quantitative Untersuchungen an den Sehganglien der FliegenMusca domestica undDrosophila melanogaster. Doctoral Thesis, Eberhard-Karls-Universität, Tübingen (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, M.: Comparative behavioral studies on two visual mutants ofDrosophila. J. comp. Physiol.80, 119–136 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, M., Götz, K.G.: The use of mutations for the partial degradation of vision inDrosophila melanogaster. J. comp. Physiol.98, 217–241 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotta, Y., Benzer, S.: Genetic dissection of theDrosophila nervous system by means of mosaics. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.)67, 1156–1163 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, W.: The relationship between visual movement detection and colour vision in insects. In: The compound eye and vision of insects. (G.A. Horridge, ed.), pp. 359–377. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1974

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, W.D.: The use of double mutants in the investigation of visual mutants ofDrosophila (Abstract). Genetics83, s38-s39 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, W.D., Trout, W.E.: The behaviour of four neurological mutants ofDrosophila. Genetics61, 399–409 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschfeld, K.: Absorption properties of photopigments in single rods, cones and rhabdomeres. In: Processing of optical data by organisms and machines. New-York-London: Academic Press 1969

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschfeld, K.: Aufnahme und Verarbeitung optischer Daten im Komplexauge von Insekten. Naturwissenschaften58, 201–209 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschfeld, K.: The visual system ofMusca: Studies on optics, structure and function. In: Information processing in the visual system of arthropods (R. Wehner, ed.), pp. 61–74. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1972

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschfeld, K., Franceschini, N.: Optische Eigenschaften der Ommatidien im Komplexauge vonMusca. Kybernetik5, 47–52 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschfeld, K., Lutz, B.: Lateral inhibition in the compound eye of the flyMusca. Z. Naturforsch.29c, 95–97 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschfeld, K., Reichardt, W.: Optomotorische Versuche anMusca mit linear polarisiertem Licht. Z. Naturforsch.25b, 228 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschfeld, K., Snyder, W.: Waveguide mode effects, birefringence and dichroism in fly photoreceptors. In: Photoreceptor optics (eds. A.W. Snyder, R. Menzel), pp. 56–77. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1975

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, G.D., Arnett, D.W.: Spectral and polarization sensitivity of the dipteran visual system. J. gen. Physiol.59, 534–558 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, G.D., MacGinitie, G.F.: Optomotor response studies of insect vision. Proc. roy. Soc. B163, 369–401 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Menne, D., Spatz, H.C.: Color vision inDrosophila melanogaster. J. comp. Physiol.114, 301–312 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel, R.: Colour receptors in insects. In: The compound eye and vision of insects. (ed. G.A. Horridge), pp. 121–178. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1975

    Google Scholar 

  • Mimura, K.: Some spatial properties in the first optic ganglion of the fly. J. comp. Physiol.105, 65–82 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Minke, B., Wu, C.F., Pak, W.L.: Isolation of light-induced response of the central retinula cells from the electroretinogram ofDrosophila. J. comp. Physiol.98, 345–355 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pak, W.L., Pinto, L.H.: Genetic approach to the study of the nervous system. Ann. Rev. Biophys. Bioengin.5, (1976)

  • Pask, C., Snyder, A.W.: Angular sensitivity of lens-photoreceptor systems. In: Photoreceptor optics (eds. A.W. Snyder, R. Menzel), pp. 159–166. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1975

    Google Scholar 

  • Pick, B.: Visual flicker induces orientation behavior in the flyMusca. Z. Naturforsch.29c, 310–312 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Poggio, T., Reichardt, W.: Considerations on models of movement detection. Kybernetik13, 223–227 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Poggio, T., Reichardt, W.: Visual control of orientation behavior of the fly. II. Towards the underlying neural interactions. Quart. Rev. Biophys.9 (3), 377–438 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichardt, W., Poggio, T.: Visual control of orientation behaviour of the fly. I. A quantitative analysis. Quart. Rev. Biophys.9 (3), 311–375 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholes, J.: The electrical responses of the retinal receptors and the lamina in the visual system of the flyMusca. Kybernetik6, 149–162 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schümperli, R.A.: Evidence for colour vision inDrosophila melanogaster through spontaneous phototactic choice behaviour. J. comp. Physiol.86, 77–94 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, A.W., Pask, C.: Spectral sensitivity of Dipteran retinula cells. J. comp. Physiol.84, 59–76 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, W.S.: Spectral selectivity of visual response alterations mediated by interconversions of native and intermediate photopigments inDrosophila. J. comp. Physiol.96, 343–356 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Strausfeld, N., Campos-Ortega, J.: Some interrelationships between the first and second synaptic regions of the fly's (Musca domestica) visual system. In: Information processing in the visual system of arthropods (ed. R. Wehner), pp. 23–30. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1972

    Google Scholar 

  • Taddei-Ferretti, C., Fernandez Perez de Talens, A.: Landing reaction ofMusca domestica. Z. Naturforsch.28, 568–592 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhland, L.: Die Kapelle. In: Gedichte. 1. Edition. Tübingen-Stuttgart; Cotta 1815

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehrhahn, C.: Evidence for the role of retinal receptors R7/8 in the orientation behaviour of the fly. Biol. Cybernetics21, 213–220 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zettler, F., Järvilehto, M.: Lateral inhibition in an insect eye. Z. vergl. Physiol.76, 233–244 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The excellent technical help of C. Straub and R. Wolf is gratefully acknowledged. We are most indebted to K.G. Götz who provided the material and spiritual background for this work. We also wish to thank J. Koenig and S. Benzer for contributing the receptor mutants, W.D. Kaplan and Valentin Braitenberg for providing unpublished material. K. Kirschfeld and W.A. Harris supported this work in numerous productive discussions. We are finally obliged to B. Boschek for correcting our English and to Mrs. K. Schulze and Miss C. Hanser for typing the manuscript.

This work was in part supported by a grant of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft to M.H.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heisenberg, M., Buchner, E. The rôle of retinula cell types in visual behavior ofDrosophila melanogaster . J. Comp. Physiol. 117, 127–162 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00612784

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00612784

Keywords

Navigation