Skip to main content
Log in

Gustatory responses of the rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) palate to amino acids and derivatives

  • Published:
Journal of comparative physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    Gustatory responses to amino acids and derivatives obtained from the palatine nerve (VIIth cranial nerve) of rainbow trout (Salmogairdneri) were studied.

  2. 2.

    The response to an amino acid was characterized by its fast-adapting, phasic nature that returned to baseline within 5 s during continuous stimulation.

  3. 3.

    Complete recovery of the response took place 120 s after stimulation when tested with two identical stimuli given successively (Figs. 2, 3).

  4. 4.

    Among common amino acids tested, onlyL-isomers of proline, hydroxyproline, alanine, leucine, and phenylalanine were stimulatory (Table 1), demonstrating that the facial taste system is more narrowly-tuned to amino acid stimuli than the olfactory system. The arginine derivative,L-α-amino-β-guanidinopropionic acid (L-AGPA) andL-argininic acid, and betaine were also effective.

  5. 5.

    Concentration-response relations, when plotted semi-logarithmically, were generally sigmoidal, saturating at higher concentrations (>1 mM) (Fig. 5). The threshold concentration forL-proline, the most effective amino acid tested, was estimated to be 50 nM. The thresholds for other stimulatory chemicals ranged between 1 and 100 μM.

  6. 6.

    L-AGPA, though having higher threshold (10 μM), could induce responses three times the magnitude of that ofL-proline at 1 mM.

  7. 7.

    The stimulatory activity of heterocyclic-imino acids having 4-, 5-, and 6-membered rings and also of thioproline and hydroxyproline suggests that the receptor recognizes primarily the imino acid region (Fig. 6).

  8. 8.

    Taste responses to amino acids were independent of pH, except that arginine analogues were only active at basic pHs (Fig. 7 and Table 3). larginine was active only at pHs higher than 8.5. The palatal chemoreceptors were stimulated by waters with pHs below 7.0, suggesting the existence of receptors for pH and/or CO2 (Fig. 7).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atema J (1971) Structures and functions of the sense of taste in the catfish (Ictalurus natalis). Brain Behav Evol 4:273–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau JC, Anderson W, Oravec J (1975) Chemical stimulus determinants of cat geniculate ganglion chemoresponsive group II unit discharge. Chem Senses Flavor 1:495–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprio J (1975) High sensitivity of catfish taste receptors to amino acids. Comp Biochem Physiol [A] 52:247–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprio J (1977) Electrophysiological distinctions between the taste and smell of amino acids in catfish. Nature 266:850–851

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprio J (1978) Olfaction and taste in the channel catfish: an electrophysiological study of the responses to amino acids and derivatives. J Comp Physiol 123:357–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprio J (1980) Similarity of olfactory receptor responses (EOG) of freshwater and marine catfish to amino acids. Can J Zool 58:1778–1784

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprio J (1982) High sensitivity and specificity of olfactory and gustatory receptors of catfish to amino acids. In: Hara TJ (ed) Chemoreception in fishes. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 109–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport CJ, Caprio J (1982) Taste and tactile recordings from the ramus recurrens facialis innervating flank taste buds in the catfish. J Comp Physiol 147:217–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans RE, Hara TJ (submitted) The characteristics of the electro-olfactogram (EOG): its loss and recovery following olfactory nerve section in rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). J Comp Physiol

  • Ezeasor DN (1982) Distribution and ultrastructure of taste buds in the oropharyngeal cavity of the rainbow trout,Salmo gairdneri Richardson. J Fish Biol 20:53–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulton C (1963) Proline control of the feeding reaction ofCordylophora. J Gen Physiol 46:823–837

    Google Scholar 

  • Funakoshi M, Kawakita K, Marui T (1981) Taste responses in the facial nerve of the carp,Cyprinus carpio L. Jpn J Physiol 31:381–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh Y, Tamura T (1978) The electrical responses of the olfactory tract to amino acids in carp. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 44:341–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh Y, Tamura T (1980a) sOlfactory and gustatory responses to amino acids in two marine teleosts — red sea bream and mullet. Comp Biochem Physiol [C] 66:217–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh Y, Tamura T (1980b) Effect of amino acids on the feeding behaviour in red sea bream. Comp Biochem Physiol [C] 66:225–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh Y, Tamura T, Kobayashi H (1979) Olfactory responses to amino acids in marine teleosts. Comp Biochem Physiol [A] 62:863–868

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton PB (1962) Ion exchange chromatography of amino acids — Microdetermination of free amino acids in serum. Ann NY Acad Sci 102:55–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Hara TJ (1973) Olfactory responses to amino acids in rainbow trout,Salmo gairdneri. Comp Biochem Physiol [A] 44:407–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Hara TJ (1975) Olfaction in fish. In: Kerkut GA, Phillis JW (eds). Progress in neurobiology, vol 5. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 271–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Hara TJ (1976a) Structure-activity relationships of amino acids in fish olfaction. Comp Biochem Physiol [A] 54:31–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Hara TJ (1976b) Effects of pH on the olfactory responses to amino acids in rainbow trout,Salmo gairdneri. Comp Biochem Physiol [A] 54:37–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Hara TJ (1977) Further studies on the structure-activity relationships of amino acids in fish olfaction. Comp Biochem Physiol [A] 56:559–565

    Google Scholar 

  • Hara TJ (ed) (1982a) Chemoreception in fishes. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Hara TJ (1982b) Structure-activity relationships of amino acids as olfactory stimuli. In: Hara TJ (ed) Chemoreception in fishes. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 135–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Hara TJ, Law YMC (1972) Adaptation of the olfactory bulbar response in fish. Brain Res 47:259–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Hara TJ, Law YMC, Hobden BR (1973 a) Comparison of the olfactory response to amino acids in rainbow trout, brook trout, and whitefish. Comp Biochem Physiol [A] 45:969–977

    Google Scholar 

  • Hara TJ, Law YMC, Veen E van der (1973b) A stimulatory apparatus for studying the olfactory activity in fishes. J Fish Res Board Can 30:283–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Hara TJ, Mcdonald S, Evans RE, Marui T, Arai S (in press) Morpholine, bile acids, and skin mucus as possible chemical cues in salmonid homing: electrophysiological re-evaluation. In: McCleave JD (ed) Mechanisms of migration in fishes, NATO conference series. Plenum Press, New York

  • Herrick CJ (1899) The cranial and first spinal nerves ofMenidia: a contribution upon the nerve components of the bony fishes. J Comp Neurol 9:153–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidaka I, Yokota S (1967) Taste receptor stimulation by sweettasting substances in the carp. Jpn J Physiol 17:652–666

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidaka I, Kiyohara S, Tabata M, Yonezawa K (1975) Gustatory responses in the puffer. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 41:275–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidaka I, Nyu N, Kiyohara S (1976) Gustatory response in the puffer. IV. Effects of mixtures of amino acids and betaine. Bull Fac Fish Mie Univ 3:17–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidaka I, Ohsugi T, Kubomatsu T (1978) Taste receptor stimulation and feeding behaviour in the puffer,Fugu pardalis I. Effect of single chemicals. Chem Senses Flavor 3:341–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoglund LB (1961) The reaction of fishes in concentration gradients. Fish Board Swed Inst Freshwater Res (Drottningholm) 43:1–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiyohara S, Hidaka I, Tamura T (1975a) The anterior cranial gustatory pathways in fish. Experientia 31:1051–1053

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiyohara S, Hidaka I, Tamura T (1975b) Gustatory response in the puffer. II. Single fiber analyses. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 41:383–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiyohara S, Yamashita S, Kitoh J (1980) Distribution of taste buds on the lips and inside the mouth in the minnow,Pseudorasbora parva. Physiol Behav 24:1143–1147

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiyohara S, Yamashita S, Harada S (1981) High sensitivity of minnow gustatory receptors to amino acids. Physiol Behav 26:1103–1108

    Google Scholar 

  • Konishi J, Zotterman Y (1961) Taste functions in the carp. An electrophysiological study on gustatory fibres. Acta Physiol Scand 52:150–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Konishi J, Hidaka I, Toyota M, Matsuda H (1969) High sensitivity of the palatal chemoreceptors of the carp to carbon dioxide. Jpn J Physiol 19:327–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohsugi T, Hidaka I, Ikeda M (1978) Taste receptor stimulation and feeding behaviour in the puffer,Fugu pardalis II. Effects produced by mixtures of constituents of clam extracts. Chem Senses Flavor 3:355–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimer AA (1971) Specificity of feeding chemoreceptors inPalythoa psammophilia (Zoanthidea, Coelenterata). Comp Gen Pharmacol 2:383–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimer AA (1973) Feeding behavior in the sea anemoneCalliactis polypus (Forskal 1775). Comp Biochem Physiol [A] 44:1289–1301

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver WL (1979) Olfactory responses from a marine elasmobranch, the Atlantic stingray,Dasyatis sabina. Mar Behav Physiol 6:297–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutterlin AM, Sutterlin N (1970) Taste responses in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) parr. J Fish Res Board Can 27:1927–1942

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutterlin AM, Sutterlin N (1971) Electrical responses of the olfactory epithelium of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). J Fish Res Board Can 28:565–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki N, Tucker D (1971) Amino acids as olfactory stimuli in freshwater catfish,Ictalurus catus (L.). Comp Biochem Physiol [A] 40:399–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto Y, Manji T, Saito A, Maeda K, Ohta K (1979) Ion-exchange chromatographic separation and fluorometric detection of guanidino compounds in physiologic fluids. J Chromatogr 162:327–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamashita S, Yoshii K (1977) CO2 responses of exteroceptors in the minnow (Pseudorasbora parva). In: Le Magnen J, MacLeod P (eds) Olfaction and taste VI. Information Retrieval, London Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshii K, Kamo N, Kurihara K, Kobatake Y (1979) Gustatory responses of eel palatine receptors to amino acids and carboxylic acids. J Gen Physiol 74:301–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshii K, Kashiwayanagi M Kurihara K, Kobatake Y (1980) High sensitivity of the eel palatine receptors to carbon dioxide. Comp Biochem Physiol [A] 66:327–330

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marui, T., Evans, R.E., Zielinski, B. et al. Gustatory responses of the rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) palate to amino acids and derivatives. J. Comp. Physiol. 153, 423–433 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00612597

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00612597

Keywords

Navigation