Physiological characteristics of the tympanic organ in noctuoid moths

Summary

We show the variations in the spike activity of both auditory receptors inSpodoptera frugiperda, Mocis latipes, Ascalapha odorata (Noctuidae),Maenas jussiae andEmpyreuma pugione (Arctiidae) immediately after 45 ms and 5 s acoustic stimuli at different intensities. The frequency of the applied stimuli was 34 kHz forE. pugione and 20 kHz for the other species. The electrical activity of the auditory receptors was recorded at the tympanic nerve with a stainless steel hook electrode. When the 45 ms pulses cease there is an afterdischarge from both auditory receptors in all the species. The number of spikes in the afterdischarge activity of both receptor cells (A₁ and A₂) shows a linear relation with stimulus intensity (Table 1). This number increases monotonically with increments in stimulus intensity, except for the A₁ cell activity inE. pugione, which decreases at intensities higher than 55 dB (Fig. 1). There are significant species-specific differences in the slope values of the number of spikes in the afterdischarge of both auditory receptors. After a 5 s stimulusM. latipes andM. jussiae show a rapid recovery of the standard spontaneous A₁-cell discharge level. Poststimulus A₁-cell spike activity inS. frugiperda shows a silent period, the duration of which increases with stimulus intensity (Fig. 3).E. pugione andA. odorata show such a silent period after low and moderately intense stimuli, but at high intensities the post-stimulus activity exceeds the pre-stimulus spontaneous discharge (Fig. 3). We demonstrate statistically that these variations cannot be explained by the random fluctuations of the standard spontaneous discharge. They are thus considered a silent and a rebound period respectively (Fig. 5). The presence and duration of either type of period seem to depend on the magnitude of the response to the acoustic stimulus. They thus seem related to the adaptation rate and the previously suggested existence of peripheral inhibitory interaction between the auditory receptors.