Skip to main content
Log in

Spectral sensitivity of screening pigment migration in the compound eye ofManduca sexta

  • Published:
Journal of comparative physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    The pupillary response in the compound eye ofManduca sexta results from pigment migration in pigment cells located distal to the retina. We used reflectance photometry to measure the spectral sensitivity of the pupillary response (Figs. 1–4), and compared pupillary action spectra with the ERG spectral sensitivity function and the absorption spectra of retinal visual pigments (Figs. 3–5). Our study was provoked by the report of Hamdorf and Höglund (1981) that the pupillary response of a related moth is maximal in the violet and ultraviolet, but is insensitive to wavelengths greater than 530 nm. Since, in sharp contrast, retinal sensitivity peaks in the green, and drops off at shorter wavelengths, they concluded that the pupillary response is not coupled to retinal excitation, but may result from intrinsic photosensitivity of the pigment cells themselves. Our aim was to test this conclusion by more accurately measuring the spectral response of the pigment cells.

  2. 2.

    The spectral sensitivity of the pupillary response from 460–690 nm matches the ERG action spectrum (Fig. 5), and both correspond to the absorption spectrum of the long wavelength photopigment (P520, λ max = 520 nm) present in the retina (Fig. 3).

  3. 3.

    There is a second peak in pupillary action spectra between 410 and 450 nm that varies from eye to eye in its height relative to the maximum at 520 nm (Fig. 4). The short wavelength peak corresponds to the violet receptors of the retina, whose existence has been inferred from selective adaptation experiments and from the presence of a violet sensitive photopigment (P440, λmax ≅440 nm). A violet peak is not prominent in the dark-adapted ERG spectral sensitivity function (Fig. 5). The variable violet peak in pupillary action spectra may reflect variation in relative input to the pigment cells from the green and violet receptors.

  4. 4.

    We conclude that the pupillary response is probably driven by way of the retinal receptors, rather than depending on a photosensitive system within the pigment cells themselves. As in other insects, the pupillary response inManduca provides the possibility for non-invasively measuring visual function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ERG :

electroretinogram

P520 :

green sensitive rhodopsin

P440 :

violet sensitive rhodopsin

P345 :

ultraviolet sensitive rhodopsin

References

  • Bennett RR (1983) Circadian rhythm of visual sensitivity inManduca sexta and its development from an ultradian rhythm. J Comp Physiol 150:165–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett RR, Brown PK (1983) Properties ofManduca visual pigments in two detergents. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci (Suppl) 24:164

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard GD (1982) Noninvasive optical techniques for probing insect photoreceptors. In: Packer L (ed) Methods in enzymology, vol 81. Visual pigments and purple membranes I. Academic Press, New York, pp 752–759

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard GD, Stavenga DG (1979) Spectral sensitivities of retinular cells measured in intact, living flies by an optical method. J Comp Physiol 134:95–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard GD, Wehner R (1980) Intracellular optical physiology of the bee's eye. I. Spectral sensitivity. J Comp Physiol 137:193–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler R (1971) The identification and mapping of spectral cell types in the retina ofPeriplaneta americana. Z Vergl Physiol 72:67–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreisig H (1981) The dynamics of pigment migration in insect superposition eyes. J Comp Physiol 143:491–502

    Google Scholar 

  • Frixione E, Aréchiga H (1981) Ionic dependence of screening pigment migration in crayfish retinal photoreceptors. J Comp Physiol 144:35–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin DR, Hubbard R, Wald G (1947) The sensitivity of the human eye to infra-red radiation. J Opt Soc Am 37:546–554

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamdorf K (1979) The physiology of invertebrate visual pigments. In: Autrum H (ed) Handbook of sensory physiology, vol VII/6A. Compararative physiology and evolution of vision in invertebrates: Invertebrate photoreceptors. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 145–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamdorf K, Höglund G (1981) Light induced retinal screening pigment migration independent of visual cell activity. J Comp Physiol 143:305–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamdorf K, Schwemer J (1975) Photoregeneration and the adaptation process in insect photoreceptors. In: Snyder AW, Menzel R (eds) Photoreceptor optics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 263–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Höglund G (1963) Glow, sensitivity changes and pigment migration in the compound eye of nocturnal Lepidoptera. Life Sci 2:275–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Höglund G (1966a) Pigment migration and retinular sensitivity. In: Bernhard CG (ed) Wenner-Gren Center International Symposium Series. Functional organization of the compound eye. Pergamon Press, Oxford New York, pp 77–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Höglund G (1966b) Pigment migration, light screening and receptor sensitivity in the compound eye of nocturnal Lepidoptera. Acta Physiol Scand (Suppl) 282:1–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Höglund G, Struwe G (1970) Pigment migration and spectral sensitivity in the compound eye of moths. Z Vergl Physiol 67:229–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Höglund G, Hamdorf K, Langer H, Paulsen R, Schwemer J (1973) The photopigments in an insect retina. In: Langer H (ed) Biochemistry and physiology of visual pigments. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 167–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschfeld K, Franceschini N (1969) Ein Mechanismus zur Steuerung des Lichtflusses in den Rhabdomeren des Komplexauges vonMusca. Kybernetik 6:13–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunze P (1979) Apposition and superposition eyes. In: Autrum H (ed) Handbook of sensory physiology, vol VII/6A. Comparative physiology and evolution of vision in invertebrates. Invertebrate photoreceptors. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 441–502

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwemer J, Langer H (1982) Insect visual pigments. In: Packer L (ed) Methods in enzymology vol 81. Visual pigments and purple membranes I. Academic Press, New York, pp 182–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwemer J, Paulsen R (1973) Three visual pigments inDeilephila elpenor (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae). J Comp Physiol 86:215–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavenga DG (1979) Pseudopupils of compound eyes. In: Autrum H (ed) Handbook of sensory physiology, vol VII/6A. Comparative physiology and evolution of vision in invertebrates: Invertebrate photoreceptors. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 357–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsch B (1977) Ultrastruktur und funktionelle Morphologie der Augen des NachtfaltersDeilephila elpenor (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae). Cytobiologie 14:378–400

    Google Scholar 

  • White RH, Brown PK, Hurley AK, Bennett RR (1983) Rhodopsins, retinula cell ultrastructure, and receptor potentials in the developing pupal eye of the mothManduca sexta. J Comp Physiol 150:153–163

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

White, R.H., Banister, M.J. & Bennett, R.R. Spectral sensitivity of screening pigment migration in the compound eye ofManduca sexta . J. Comp. Physiol. 153, 59–66 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00610343

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00610343

Keywords

Navigation