Advertisement

Journal of comparative physiology

, Volume 95, Issue 2, pp 123–167 | Cite as

Über die logische Struktur eines Nervensystems

  • Friedrich Zettler
Article

On the logic structure of a nervous system

Summary

This paper describes an attempt to apply the concepts of modern logic toward encompassing one sort of nervous system function, sensory perception, within a general theoretical framework. Starting from the biological role of a sense organ to receive factual situations of the environment, one may treat the individual receptor as an elementary proposition, and a nerve network as a molecular proposition. Taking the known neurophysiology of the system into consideration, one recognizes that the logical functions contained in these propositional forms are those of a many-valued logic. The neuronal principles of lateral and linear inhibition provided ground for two basic propositional functions from which a variety of further functions can be constructed. The elements of construction are due to the anatomical principles of nerve cell connections: linear, lateral, and recurrent.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Eccles, J. C.: Physiologie der Nervenzellen und ihrer Synapsen. In: Physiologie des Menschen, Bd. 10. Eds. Gauer-Kramer-Jung. MÜnchen: Urban & Schwarzenberg 1971Google Scholar
  2. Hartline, H. K.: Visual receptors and retinal interaction. Science164, 270–278 (1969)Google Scholar
  3. Hoffmann, E.: Platon. Eine EinfÜhrung in sein Philosophieren. Rowohlts deutsche Enzyklopädie. Ed. E. Grassi. Hamburg: Rowohlt 1961Google Scholar
  4. Kleene, S. C.: Representation of events in nerve nets and finit automata. In: Automata Studies. Ann. Math. Studies34, 3–41 (1956)Google Scholar
  5. McCulloch, W. S., Pitts, W.: A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull. Math. Biophys.5, 115–137 (1943)Google Scholar
  6. Neumann, J. v.: Probabilistic logics and the synthesis of reliable organisms from unreliable components. In: Automata studies. Ann. Math. Studies34, 43–98 (1966)Google Scholar
  7. Neumann, J. v.: The computer and the brain. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press 1958. Deutsch: MÜnchen: Oldenburg Verlag 1960Google Scholar
  8. Quine, W. V.: Philosophie der Logik. [Aus dem Englischen.] Stuttgart: Kohlhammer 1973Google Scholar
  9. Sinowjew, A. A.: Über mehrwertige Logik. Ein Abriß. [Aus dem Russischen.] Berlin: Verlag der Wissenschaften 1968Google Scholar
  10. StegmÜller, W.: Metaphysik, Skepsis, Wissenschaft, 2. Aufl. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1969Google Scholar
  11. Zadeh, L. A.: Fuzzy Sets. Inf. Contr.8, 338–353 (1965)Google Scholar
  12. Frege, G.: Funktion, Begriff, Bedeutung. FÜnf logische Studien. Ed. G. Patzig. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht 1962Google Scholar
  13. Frege, G.: Logische Untersuchungen. Ed. G. Patzig. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht 1966Google Scholar
  14. Frege, G.: Begriffsschrift und andere Aufsätze. 2. Aufl. Ed. Angelelli. Hildesheim: G. Olms Verlag 1971Google Scholar
  15. Russel, B.: Probleme der Philosophie. [Aus dem Englischen.] Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag 1967Google Scholar
  16. Scholz, H., Hasenjaeger, G.: GrundzÜge der mathematischen Logik. Berlin-Göttingen- Heidelberg: Springer 1961Google Scholar
  17. Tarski, A.: The semantic conception of truth and the foundations of semantics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research4 (1944). [Deutsch in: Zur Philosophie der idealen Sprache, Ed. J. Sinnreich. MÜnchen: DTV 1972]Google Scholar
  18. Whitehead, A. N.: Abenteuer der Ideen. [Aus dem Englischen.] Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag 1971Google Scholar
  19. Wittgenstein, L.: Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag 1963Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Friedrich Zettler
    • 1
  1. 1.Zoologisches Institut der Universität MÜnchenMÜnchenBundesrepublik Deutschland

Personalised recommendations