Skip to main content
Log in

Subglottic pressure and the control of phonation by the echolocating bat,Eptesicus

  • Published:
Journal of comparative physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    The respiratory dynamics of phonation, particularly the relationship between subglottic pressure and the sound pressure level (SPL), frequency and duration of vocalizations by nine bats (Eptesicus fuscus) is described.

  2. 2.

    Subglottic pressure rises to about 30 or 40 cm H2O immediately prior to emission of a single FM pulse or group of pulses, respectively, and drops 5 to 20 cm H2O during the course of each pulse (Fig. 2).

  3. 3.

    The maximum SPL of the echolocative pulse is positively correlated with the magnitude of the subglottic pressure at the onset of phonation in eight bats. The unusually high subglottic pressure in bats is an adaptation for the production of high intensity orientation pulses, thus increasing the range of echolocation.

  4. 4.

    The maximum SPL was proportional to the subglottic pressure at the pulse onset raised to a power which ranged from a mean of 0.4 to 1.36 for individualEptesicus (Fig. 3 and Table 1). The approximately linear relationship between sound pressure level and onset subglottic pressure in several bats suggests the vocal tract has a minimal effect on pulse intensity.

  5. 5.

    Within a given vocalization, upward sweeping FM is usually associated with either constant or increasing subglottic pressure (Figs. 4 and 5), but the absolute value of the subglottic pressure at pulse onset is correlated with the initial frequency of vocalization in only four of these bats (Table 2).

  6. 6.

    Subglottic pressure drops most rapidly during short pulses, but during long vocalizations (exceeding 20 ms) it attains a minimum rate of decline of about 0.2 cm H2O/ms (Fig. 6 and Table 2), which may be determined by the maximum glottal resistance at which phonation can occur.

  7. 7.

    The relatively non-compliant lung ofEptesicus (mean static compliance = 0.021 ±0.002 ml/cm H2O) may be an adaptation for the production of the unusually high subglottic pressures needed to produce high intensity echolocative pulses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altman P, Dittmer D (eds) (1971) Respiration and circulation. Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, Bethesda, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Amdur M, Mead J (1958) Mechanics of respiration in unanesthetized guinea pigs. Am J Physiol 192:364–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Beranek LL (1967) Acoustic measurements. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg JW van den (1956) Direct and indirect determination of the mean subglottic pressure. Folia Phoniatr (Basel) 8:1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouhuys A, Proctor DF, Mead J (1966) Kinetic aspects of singing. J Appl Physiol 21:483–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavagna GA, Margaria R (1965) An analysis of the mechanics of phonation. J Appl Physiol 20:301–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosfill ML, Widdicombe JG (1961) Physical characteristics of the chest and lungs and the work of breathing in different mammalian species. J Physiol (Lond) 158:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper M, Ladefoged P, Whitteridge D (1959) Respiratory muscles in speech. J Speech Hear Res 2:16–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias H (1907) Zur Anatomie des Kehlkopfes der Mikrochiropteren. Morphol Jahrb 37:70–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb GL, Agarwal GC (1970) Filtering of electromyographic signals. Am J Phys Med 49:142–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin DR (1958) Listening in the dark. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin DR, Hollander P (1973) Directional patterns of bat's orientation sounds. Period Biol 75:3–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths TA (1978) Modification ofM. cricothyroideus and the larynx in the Mormoopidae, with reference to amplification of high-frequency pulses. J Mammal 59:724–730

    Google Scholar 

  • Isshiki N (1964) Regulatory mechanism of voice intensity variation. J Speech Hear Res 7:17–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Koyama T, Kawasaki M, Ogura JH (1969) Mechanics of voice production. I. Regulation of intensity. Laryngoscope 79:337–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladefoged P (1968) Linguistic aspects of respiratory phenomena. Ann NY Acad Sci 155 (1):141–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladefoged P, McKinney N (1963) Loudness, sound pressure, and subglottic pressure in speech. J Acoust Soc Am 35:454–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Novick A, Griffin DR (1961) Laryngeal mechanisms in bats for the production of orientation sounds. J Exp Zool 148:125–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostle B (1963) Statistics in research. The Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA

    Google Scholar 

  • Philbrick/Nexus Research (1968) Applications manual for operational amplifiers. Teledyne Corporation, Dedham, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pye JD (1967) Synthesizing the waveforms of bats' pulses. In: Busnel R-G (ed) Animal sonar systems, vol I. Laboratoire de Physiologie Acoustique, Jouy-en-Josas, France, pp 43–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts L (1972a) Variable resonance in constant frequency bats. J Zool (Lond) 166:337–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts L (1972b) Correlation of respiration and ultrasound production in rodents and bats. J Zool (Lond) 168:439–449

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts L (1973) Cavity resonances in the production of orientation cries. Period Biol 75:27–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler H-U (1968) Die Ultraschall-Ortungslaute der Hufeisen- Fledermäuse (Chiroptera-Rhinolophidae) in verschiedenen Orientierungssituationen. Z Vergl Physiol 57:376–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler H-U (1970) Comparison of echolocation behavior inRhinolophus ferrumeguinum andChilonycteris rubiginosa. Bijdr Dierkd 40:77–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler H-U (1973) Control of Doppler shift compensation in the greater horseshoe bat,Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. J Comp Physiol 82:79–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuller G, Suga N (1976) Laryngeal mechanisms for the emission of CF-FM sounds in the Doppler-shift compensating bat,Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. J Comp Physiol 107:253–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimozawa T, Suga N, Hendler P, Schuetze S (1974) Directional sensitivity of echolocation system in bats producing frequency-modulated signals. J Exp Biol 60:53–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons JA (1969) Acoustic radiation patterns for the echolocating batsChilonycteris rubiginosa andEptesicus fuscus. J Acoust Soc Am 46:1054–1056

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons JA, Vernon JA (1971) Echolocation: Discrimination of targets by the batEptesicus fuscus. J Exp Zool 176:315–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens K, House A (1961) An acoustical theory of vowel production and some of its implications. J Speech Hear Res 4:303–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Suga N, Schlegel P (1972) Neural attenuation of responses to emitted sounds in echolocating bats. Science 177:82–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Suthers RA, Durrant GE (1980) The role of the anterior and posterior circothyroid muscles in the production of echolocative pulses by Mormoopidae. In: Busnel R-G, Fish JF (ed) Animal sonar systems. Plenum Press, New York, pp 995–997

    Google Scholar 

  • Suthers RA, Fattu JM (1973) Mechanisms of sound production by echolocating bats. Am Zool 13:1215–1226

    Google Scholar 

  • Suthers RA, Fattu JM (submitted) Selective laryngeal neurotomy and the control of phonation by the echolocating bat,Eptesicus. J Comp Physiol

  • Suthers RA, Thomas SP, Suthers BJ (1972) Respiration, wingbeat and ultrasonic pulse emission in an echolocating bat. J Exp Biol 56:37–48

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Mr. John Smith provided valuable assistance in computer programming and interfacing systems. Drs. Dwight Hector and Malcolm Hast made helpful comments on a draft of this manuscript. Ms. Michele Wright assisted in preparing the figures. Supported by NSF research grant BNS 76-01716 to RAS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fattu, J.M., Suthers, R.A. Subglottic pressure and the control of phonation by the echolocating bat,Eptesicus . J. Comp. Physiol. 143, 465–475 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00609913

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00609913

Keywords

Navigation