Skip to main content
Log in

Response properties of the glossopharyngeal taste system of the mud puppy (Necturus maculosus)

II. Responses of individual first-order neurons

  • Published:
Journal of comparative physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The responses of individual glossopharyngeal neurons of the mud puppy,Necturus maculosus, were examined over an extended concentration series of NaCl, HCl, quinine hydrochloride (QHCl) and sucrose solutions. Neuron isolation was evaluated by a computer program that sorted neural impulses according to amplitude (Fig. 1). When sufficient isolation existed, a second program counted the impulses in each test period as well as in pre- and post-stimulus periods. Response latencies were calculated independently.

The response to taste stimulation took one of three forms: 1) increased activity, 2) decreased activity, or 3) increased activity to the water rinse. For each concentration series the magnitude (SR) and latency functions of the responses were determined. These varied among stimuli and among nerve fibers (Fig. 4). However, the SR and latency functions were found in specific combinations, the most unique being one in which both functions remained constant over an entire concentration series (Fig. 4E, F).

Most neurons responded to more than one of the stimuli. Many, however, responded to at least one of the stimuli with a particular form of response and combination of SR and latency functions (Fig. 6). In this sense they may be considered chemospecific as well as multiply sensitive. Despite the many types of response, the sum of the individual SR functions closely resembled the SR functions of the whole nerve (Fig. 7) and the summed latencies produced a temporal pattern with a phasic component similar to that of the whole nerve response (Fig. 8).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

SR :

stimulus concentration vs response magnitude

L :

latency of response

+,0, -,I (SR orL):

magnitude or latency functions with positive, zero, negative or indeterminate slope

QHCl :

quinine hydrochloride

References

  • Bartoshuk LM, Harned MA, Parks LH (1971) Taste of water in the cat: effects on sucrose preference. Science 171:699–701

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard RA (1972) Antidromic inhibition: a new model of taste receptor function. In: Schneider D (ed) Olfaction and taste IV. Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, Stuttgart, pp 301–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau JC, Bradley BE, Bierer PR, Kurger S, Tsuchitani C (1971) Single unit recordings from the geniculate ganglion of the facial nerve of the cat. Exp Brain Res 13:461–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen M, Hagiwara S, Zotterman Y (1955) The response spectrum of taste fibers in the cat: a single fiber analysis. Acta Physiol Scand 33:316–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Faull JR, Halpern BP (1972) Taste stimuli: time course of peripheral nerve response and theoretical models. Science 178:73–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman IY (1957) Single fiber gustatory impulses in rat and hamster. J Cell Comp Physiol 49:319–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern BP (1973) The use of vertebrate laboratory animals in research on taste. In: Gay W (ed) Methods of animal experimentation. Academic Press, New York, pp 302–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern BP, Tapper D (1971) Taste stimuli: quality coding time. Science 171:1256–1258

    Google Scholar 

  • Iggo A, Leek BF (1967) The afferent innervation of the tongue of the sheep. In: Hayashi T (ed) Olfaction and taste II. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 493–507

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusano K (1960) Analysis of the single unit activity of gustatory receptors in the frog tongue. Jpn J Physiol 10:620–633

    Google Scholar 

  • Mistretta CM (1972) A quantitative analysis of rat chorda tympani fiber discharge patterns. In: Schneider D (ed) Olfaction and taste IV. Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, Stuttgart, pp 294–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa H, Sato M, Yamashita S (1969) Gustatory impulse discharge in response to saccharin in rats and hamsters. J Physiol 204:311–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa H, Yamashita S, Sato M (1974) Variation in gustatory nerve fiber discharge pattern with change in stimulus concentration and quality. J Neurophysiol 37:443–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfaffmann C (1941) Gustatory afferent impulses. J Cell Comp Physiol 17:243–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfaffmann C (1955) Gustatory nerve impulses in rat, cat and rabbit. J Neurophysiol 18:429–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Samanen DW (1977) The electrophysiological responses of gustatory neurons of the mud puppy,Necturus maculosus. Doctoral Dissertation. Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato M, Ogawa H, Yamashita S (1975) Response properties of macaque monkey chorda tympani fibers. J Gen Physiol 66:781–810

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato T (1976) Latency of taste nerve signals in frog. Experientia 32:877–879

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider M, Samanen DW, Bernard RA (1978) A computer method for determining the degree of isolation in single neuron recordings. J Electrophysiol Techn 6:17–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Taglietti V, Casella C, Ferrari E (1969) Interactions between taste receptors in the frog tongue. Pflügers Arch 312:139–148

    Google Scholar 

  • West CHK, Bernard RA (1978) Intracellular characteristics and responses of taste bud and lingual cells of the mud puppy. J Gen Physiol 72:305–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Yinon U, Erickson R (1970) Adaptation and the neural code for taste. Brain Res 23:428–432

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported in part by NIH Grant NS09168

The authors wish to thank Mr. Marc Schneider for the computer programs and his expert assistance and Mrs. G. Chapman of Florida State University for photography. We also thank Dr. David V. Smith for his critical comments. This work was submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph. D. degree to Michigan State University by the senior author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Samanen, D.W., Bernard, R.A. Response properties of the glossopharyngeal taste system of the mud puppy (Necturus maculosus). J. Comp. Physiol. 143, 151–158 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00606079

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00606079

Keywords

Navigation