Abstract
This paper discusses the possibilities of restoring in a perturbed genome the genetic situation existing before the perturbation. For this reason we allowed a continuous flow of genes of the original genome (Oregon strain) into the perturbed one. The initial perturbation of the Oregon strain consisted of a cross with the unrelated Canton strain.
We further set up an experiment which aimed at checking the evolutionary dynamics of theAdh locus, of five metric traits and of fitness in the different synthetic gene pools obtained by decreasing the percentage of the Canton genes compared to the introgressed Oregon ones.
As the two strains are differently monomorphic at theAdh locus, initially we used theAdh genotype frequency as marker of the genetic substitution. We then considered the resulting gene pools before and after two years of cage culture where no factors other than meiosis and natural selection affected the results. Finally we performed breeding experiments between these cage populations and the two original strains which attempt to check whether there is genetic evidence of the different level of introgressive hybridization.
The results indicate that during the two years of cage culture the populations experienced a convergence phenomenon which produced average genotypes unexpectedly similar to one another. These similarities pertain toAdh allele frequency, metric traits, reproductive fitness, and, most of all, the behaviour exhibited in the crosses with the two strains. We conclude that the introgressive hybridization failed to restore an Oregon-like genome. Our findings are discussed in terms of two explanatory hypotheses: that heterozygosity was the only driving force of the evolutionary pathways of the examined populations; alternatively that Canton and Oregon genes combined non-additively giving rise to a new hybrid coadaptive system.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Annest, J. L. & Templeton, A. R., 1978. Genetic recombination and clonal selection in Drosophila mercatorum. Genetics 89: 193–210.
Asmussen, M. A. & Clegg, M. T., 1981. Dynamics of the linkage disequilibrium function under models of gene-frequency hitchhiking. Genetics 99: 337–356.
Barker, J. S. F., 1979. Interlocus interactions: a review of experimental evidence. Theor. Popul. Biol. 16: 323–346.
Bloom, W. L., 1976. Multivariate analysis of the introgressive replacement of Clarkia nitens by Clarkia speciosa polyantha (Onagraceae). Evolution 30: 412–424.
Dobzhansky, Th., 1937. Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia Univ. Press, N.Y.
Dobzhansky, Th., 1970. Genetics of the evolutionary process. Columbia Univ. Press, N.Y.
Ehrlich, P. R. & Raven, P. H., 1969. Differentiation of populations. Science 165: 1228–1232.
Emmel, T. C., 1976. Population biology. Harper and Row, N.Y.
Franklin, I. & Lewontin, R. C., 1970. Is the gene the unit of selection? Genetics 65: 707–734.
Hill, W. G. & Robertson, A., 1968. Linkage disequilibrium in finite populations. Theor. appl. Genet. 38: 226–231.
Jackson, J. F. & Pounds, J. A., 1979. Comments on assessing the dedifferentiation effect of gene flow. Syst. Zool. 28: 78–85.
Jones, J. S., Briant, S. M., Lewontin, R. C., Moore, J. A. & Prout, T., 1981. Gene flow and the geographical distribution of molecular polymorphism in Drosophila pseudoobseura. Genetics 98: 157–178.
Kimura, M. & Crow, J. F., 1964. The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genetics 49: 725–738.
Langley, C. H., 1977. Non-random associations between allozymes in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. In: Measuring selection in natural populations (ed. F. B., Christiansen and T. M., Fenchel), pp. 263–274. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Li, W. H., 1978. Maintenance of genetic variability under the joint effect of mutation, selection and random drift. Genetics 90: 349–382.
Mayr, E., 1942. Systematics and the origin of species from the viewpoint of a zoologist. Columbia Univ. Press, N.Y.
Pieragostini, E., Sangiorgi, S. & Cavicchi, S., 1979. Adh system and genetic background: interaction with wing length in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica 50: 201–206.
Pieragostini, E., Sangiorgi, S., Giorgi, G. & Cavicchi, S., 1981. Mimicry of isozyme adaptive advantage by gene association. I. Relationship between Adh genotypes and body dimension in Drosophila cage populatiens: a multivariate analysis. Genetica 56: 27–37.
Sangiorgi, S., Pieragostini, E., Prosperi, L., Leggieri, P. and Cavicchi, S., 1981. Mimicry of isozyme adaptive advantage by gene association. II. Adh genotype frequency variations in Drosophila cage populations reared at different temperatures. Genetica 56: 229–234.
Watterson, G. A., 1977. Heterosis or neutrality? Genetics 85: 789–814.
Wright, S., 1980. Genic and organismic selection. Evolution 34: 825–843.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pieragostini, E., Giorgi, G., Pezzoli, C. et al. Perturbation of a gene pool I. Dynamics ofAdh system and five metric traits in differently introgressed populations ofDrosophila melanogaster . Genetica 63, 139–146 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00605898
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00605898