Summary
The antennal olfactory receptors of the predatory clerid beetle,Thanasimus formicarius (L.), are as sensitive as the receptors of its prey, the scolytid beetleIps typographus (L.), to ipsdienol, (S)-cis-verbenol and 2,3,2-methylbutenol, suggested components of the aggregation pheromone of this bark beetle.
The two species were stimulated under identical conditions and comparisons were made between electroantennogram (EAG) responses to synthetic pheromonal compounds of various species of bark beetles. At threshold concentrations for eliciting EAG responses,T. formicarius has almost equal sensitivity to most of the tested substances, whileI. typographus is more sensitive to ipsdienol and (S)-cis-verbenol, putative components of its conspecific aggregation pheromone used in long distance communication, than to its suggested antiaggregation pheromone, ipsenol (Fig. 6). In both species (S)-(+)-ipsdienol is the most effective of the tested compounds. The dose response curves of verbenol isomers reside close to the curve of (S)-(+)-ipsdienol in the clerid beetle, while in the bark beetle these isomers are much less effective than (S)-(+)-ipsdienol at high stimulus doses (Fig. 7).
Recordings from single olfactory cells ofsensilla basiconica inT. formicarius demonstrated an olfactory function of this sensillum type (Figs. 1, 3). The individual receptor cells had broad reaction spectra to the test substances; however, enantiomeric discrimination could be obtained through the response of these receptor cells (Fig. 4). The morphology and distribution of sensilla on the antenna ofT. formicarius were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
It is suggested that the apparent strategy used byT. formicarius for finding its prey is to perceive various bark beetle and tree volatiles, then after determining the ‘quality’ of the perceived mixture of odours, to approach the emitter of a preferred mixture. The kairomonal response ofT. formicarius toI. typographus could be due to a mixture of (S)-(+)-ipsdienol, (S)-(−)-ipsenol and (S)-cis-verbenol.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- EAG :
-
electroantennogram
References
Angst ME, Lanier GN (1979) Electroantennogram responses of two populations ofIps pini (Col∶Sco) to insect-produced and host tree compounds. J Chem Ecol 5:131–140
Bakke A (1981) Inhibition of the response ofIps typographus to the aggregation pheromone, field evaluation of verbenone and ipsenol. Z Angew Entomol 92(N2):172–177
Bakke A, Kvamme T (1978) Kairomone response by the predatorThanasimus formicarius andThanasimus rufipens to the synthetic pheromones ofIps typographus. Norw J Entomol 25:41–43
Bakke A, Kvamme T (1981) Kairomone response inThanasimus predators to pheromone components ofIps typographus. J Chem Ecol 7:305–312
Bakke A, Fröen P, Skatteböl L (1977) Field response to a new pheromonal compound isolated fromIps typographus. Naturwissenschaften 64:98–99
Boeckh J (1962) Electrophysiologische Untersuchungen an einzelnen Geruchsrezeptoren auf den Antennen des Totengräbers (Necrophorus, Coleoptera). Z Vergl Physiol 46:212–248
Borden JH (1977) Behavioral responses of Coleoptera to pheromones, allomones, and kairomones. In: Shorey HH, McKelvey JJ (eds) Chemical control of insect behavior, therory and application. Wiley, New York London Sydney Toronto, pp 169–198
Dickens TC (1981) Behavioral and electrophysiological responses of the bark beetle,Ips typographus, to potential pheromone components. Physiol Entomol 6:251–261
Dyer EDA, Hall PM, Safranyik L (1975) Numbers ofDendroctonus rufipennis (Kirby) andThanasimus undatulus (Say) at pheromone-baited poisoned and unpoisoned trees. J Entomol Soc Br Columbia 72:20–22
Francke W, Heemann V (1976) Das Duftstoff-Bouquet des grossen Waldgartners,Blastographus piniperda L. (Coleoptera:Scolytidae). Z Angew Entomol 82:117–119
Gauss R (1954) Die Ameisenbuntkäfer,Thanasimus (Clerus) formicarius Latr. als Borkenkäferfeind. In: Wellenstein G (ed) Die große Borkenkäferkalamität in Südwest-Deutschland 1944–1951. Wellenstein, Ringingen/Wüttental, pp 417–429
Harwood WG, Rudinsky JA (1966) The flight and olfactory behavior of checkered beetles (Col:Cleridae) predatory on douglas-fir beetle. Techn Bull 95:1–35
Kaissling K-E, Priesner (1970) Die Riechschwelle des Seiden-spinners. Naturwissenschaften 57:23–28
Light DM, Birch MC (1979) Inhibition of the attractive pheromone response inIps paraconfusus by (R)-(−)-ipsdienol. Naturwissenschaften 66:159–160
Mustaparta H (1975) Responses of single olfactory cells in the pine weevel,Hylobius abietis L. (Col:Curculionidae). J Comp Physiol 97:271–290
Mustaparta H, Angst ME, Lanier GN (1979) Specialization of olfactory cells to insect- and host-produced volatiles in the bark beetleIps pini (Say). J Chem Ecol 5:109–123
Nordlund DA, Lewis WJ (1976) Terminology of chemical releasing stimuli in intraspecific and interspecific interactions. J Chem Ecol 2:211–220
Ostle B (1969) Statistics in research. Iowa State University Press, Ames (Iowa)
Payne TL (1975) Bark beetle olfaction III. Antennal olfactory responsiveness ofDendroctonus frontalis Zimmerman andD. brevicornis Le Conte (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to aggregation pheromones and host tree terpene hydrocarbons. J Chem Ecol 1:233–242
Rudinsky JA, Novák V, Svihra P (1971) Attraction of the bark beetleIps typographus L. to terpenes and a male-produced pheromone. Z Angew Entomol 67:179–188
Silverstein RM (1979) Enantiomeric composition and bioactivity of chiral semiochemical in insects. In: Ritter FJ (ed) Chemical ecology: Odour communication in animals. Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam Oxford New York, pp 133–146
Silverstein RM, Young JC (1975) Insects generally use multi-component pheromones. In: Beroza M (ed) Pest management with insect sex attractants. American Chemical Society Washington, (DC), pp 1–29
Vité JP (1978) Insektenhormone im Waldschutz: Erreichtes und Erreichbares. Biol Zeit 8:112–119
Vité JP, Williamson DL (1970)Thanasimus dubius: Prey perception. J Insect Physiol 16:233–239
Vité JP, Bakke A, Renwick JAA (1972) Pheromones inIps (Col: Scolytidae) occurrence and production. Can Entomol 104:1967–1975
Wood DL, Browne LE, Bedard WD, Tilden PE, Silverstein RM, Rodin JO (1968) Response ofIps confusus to synthetic sex pheromones in nature. Science 159:1373–1374
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hansen, K. Reception of bark beetle pheromone in the predaceous clerid beetle,Thanasimus formicarius (Coleoptera: Cleridae). J. Comp. Physiol. 150, 371–378 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00605026
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00605026