Skip to main content
Log in

Reception of bark beetle pheromone in the predaceous clerid beetle,Thanasimus formicarius (Coleoptera: Cleridae)

  • Published:
Journal of comparative physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The antennal olfactory receptors of the predatory clerid beetle,Thanasimus formicarius (L.), are as sensitive as the receptors of its prey, the scolytid beetleIps typographus (L.), to ipsdienol, (S)-cis-verbenol and 2,3,2-methylbutenol, suggested components of the aggregation pheromone of this bark beetle.

The two species were stimulated under identical conditions and comparisons were made between electroantennogram (EAG) responses to synthetic pheromonal compounds of various species of bark beetles. At threshold concentrations for eliciting EAG responses,T. formicarius has almost equal sensitivity to most of the tested substances, whileI. typographus is more sensitive to ipsdienol and (S)-cis-verbenol, putative components of its conspecific aggregation pheromone used in long distance communication, than to its suggested antiaggregation pheromone, ipsenol (Fig. 6). In both species (S)-(+)-ipsdienol is the most effective of the tested compounds. The dose response curves of verbenol isomers reside close to the curve of (S)-(+)-ipsdienol in the clerid beetle, while in the bark beetle these isomers are much less effective than (S)-(+)-ipsdienol at high stimulus doses (Fig. 7).

Recordings from single olfactory cells ofsensilla basiconica inT. formicarius demonstrated an olfactory function of this sensillum type (Figs. 1, 3). The individual receptor cells had broad reaction spectra to the test substances; however, enantiomeric discrimination could be obtained through the response of these receptor cells (Fig. 4). The morphology and distribution of sensilla on the antenna ofT. formicarius were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

It is suggested that the apparent strategy used byT. formicarius for finding its prey is to perceive various bark beetle and tree volatiles, then after determining the ‘quality’ of the perceived mixture of odours, to approach the emitter of a preferred mixture. The kairomonal response ofT. formicarius toI. typographus could be due to a mixture of (S)-(+)-ipsdienol, (S)-(−)-ipsenol and (S)-cis-verbenol.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

EAG :

electroantennogram

References

  • Angst ME, Lanier GN (1979) Electroantennogram responses of two populations ofIps pini (Col∶Sco) to insect-produced and host tree compounds. J Chem Ecol 5:131–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakke A (1981) Inhibition of the response ofIps typographus to the aggregation pheromone, field evaluation of verbenone and ipsenol. Z Angew Entomol 92(N2):172–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakke A, Kvamme T (1978) Kairomone response by the predatorThanasimus formicarius andThanasimus rufipens to the synthetic pheromones ofIps typographus. Norw J Entomol 25:41–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakke A, Kvamme T (1981) Kairomone response inThanasimus predators to pheromone components ofIps typographus. J Chem Ecol 7:305–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakke A, Fröen P, Skatteböl L (1977) Field response to a new pheromonal compound isolated fromIps typographus. Naturwissenschaften 64:98–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeckh J (1962) Electrophysiologische Untersuchungen an einzelnen Geruchsrezeptoren auf den Antennen des Totengräbers (Necrophorus, Coleoptera). Z Vergl Physiol 46:212–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Borden JH (1977) Behavioral responses of Coleoptera to pheromones, allomones, and kairomones. In: Shorey HH, McKelvey JJ (eds) Chemical control of insect behavior, therory and application. Wiley, New York London Sydney Toronto, pp 169–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens TC (1981) Behavioral and electrophysiological responses of the bark beetle,Ips typographus, to potential pheromone components. Physiol Entomol 6:251–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer EDA, Hall PM, Safranyik L (1975) Numbers ofDendroctonus rufipennis (Kirby) andThanasimus undatulus (Say) at pheromone-baited poisoned and unpoisoned trees. J Entomol Soc Br Columbia 72:20–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Francke W, Heemann V (1976) Das Duftstoff-Bouquet des grossen Waldgartners,Blastographus piniperda L. (Coleoptera:Scolytidae). Z Angew Entomol 82:117–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauss R (1954) Die Ameisenbuntkäfer,Thanasimus (Clerus) formicarius Latr. als Borkenkäferfeind. In: Wellenstein G (ed) Die große Borkenkäferkalamität in Südwest-Deutschland 1944–1951. Wellenstein, Ringingen/Wüttental, pp 417–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood WG, Rudinsky JA (1966) The flight and olfactory behavior of checkered beetles (Col:Cleridae) predatory on douglas-fir beetle. Techn Bull 95:1–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaissling K-E, Priesner (1970) Die Riechschwelle des Seiden-spinners. Naturwissenschaften 57:23–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Light DM, Birch MC (1979) Inhibition of the attractive pheromone response inIps paraconfusus by (R)-(−)-ipsdienol. Naturwissenschaften 66:159–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Mustaparta H (1975) Responses of single olfactory cells in the pine weevel,Hylobius abietis L. (Col:Curculionidae). J Comp Physiol 97:271–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Mustaparta H, Angst ME, Lanier GN (1979) Specialization of olfactory cells to insect- and host-produced volatiles in the bark beetleIps pini (Say). J Chem Ecol 5:109–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordlund DA, Lewis WJ (1976) Terminology of chemical releasing stimuli in intraspecific and interspecific interactions. J Chem Ecol 2:211–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostle B (1969) Statistics in research. Iowa State University Press, Ames (Iowa)

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne TL (1975) Bark beetle olfaction III. Antennal olfactory responsiveness ofDendroctonus frontalis Zimmerman andD. brevicornis Le Conte (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to aggregation pheromones and host tree terpene hydrocarbons. J Chem Ecol 1:233–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudinsky JA, Novák V, Svihra P (1971) Attraction of the bark beetleIps typographus L. to terpenes and a male-produced pheromone. Z Angew Entomol 67:179–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein RM (1979) Enantiomeric composition and bioactivity of chiral semiochemical in insects. In: Ritter FJ (ed) Chemical ecology: Odour communication in animals. Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam Oxford New York, pp 133–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein RM, Young JC (1975) Insects generally use multi-component pheromones. In: Beroza M (ed) Pest management with insect sex attractants. American Chemical Society Washington, (DC), pp 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Vité JP (1978) Insektenhormone im Waldschutz: Erreichtes und Erreichbares. Biol Zeit 8:112–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Vité JP, Williamson DL (1970)Thanasimus dubius: Prey perception. J Insect Physiol 16:233–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Vité JP, Bakke A, Renwick JAA (1972) Pheromones inIps (Col: Scolytidae) occurrence and production. Can Entomol 104:1967–1975

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood DL, Browne LE, Bedard WD, Tilden PE, Silverstein RM, Rodin JO (1968) Response ofIps confusus to synthetic sex pheromones in nature. Science 159:1373–1374

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hansen, K. Reception of bark beetle pheromone in the predaceous clerid beetle,Thanasimus formicarius (Coleoptera: Cleridae). J. Comp. Physiol. 150, 371–378 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00605026

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00605026

Keywords

Navigation