Skip to main content
Log in

Disruption of the representativeness heuristic: Can we be perturbed into using correct probabilistic reasoning?

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some misconceptions in learning and understanding statistical or probabilistic concepts stem from the use of what is called the “representativeness heuristic” for solving such problems. Incorrect solutions to problems is the result. This study provided graduate students enrolled in beginning inferential statistics with a series of experiences which seemed to disrupt such faulty logic by having them experience logical inconsistencies. Such direct experimental involvement with applied probability problems was recommended as a means to enhance the use of more appropriate probabilistic reasoning in subsequent statistical or probability problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Fischbein, E. and Gazit, A.: 1984, ‘Does teaching of probability improve probabilistic intuitions?’,Educational Studies in Mathematics 15, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, J. and Ahlgren, A.: 1988, ‘Difficulties in learning basic concepts in probability and statistics: Implications for research’,Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 19, 44–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, A. S. and Kapadia, R.: 1984, ‘Children's conceptions of probability — a psychological and pedagogical review’,Educational Studies in Mathematics 15, 349–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A.: 1972, ‘Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness’,Cognitive Psychology 3, 430–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A.: 1973, ‘On the psychology of prediction’,Psychological Review 80, 237–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. and Tversky, A. (eds.): 1982,Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. and Inhelder, B.: 1975,The Origin of the Idea of Chance in Children, W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.

  • Paulos, J. A.: 1988,Innumeracy: Mathematical Illiteracy and its Consequences, Hill and Wang, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. L.Jr.: 1969,The Origins of Intellect. Piaget's Theory, W.H. Freeman and Comapny, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaughnessy, J. M.: 1977, ‘Misconceptions of probability: An experiment with a small-group, acitvity-based, model building approach to introductory probability at the college level’,Educational Studies in Mathematics 8, 295–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. and Gilovich, T.: 1989, ‘The cold facts about the “hot hand” in basketball’,Chance 2(1), 16, 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D.: 1982a, ‘Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases’, in Kahneman, Slovic, and Tversky (eds.),Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D.: 1982b, ‘Belief in the law of small numbers’, in Kahneman, Slovic, and Tversky (eds.),Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D.: 1982c, ‘Judgments of and by representativeness’, in Kahneman, Slovic, and Tversky (eds.),Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cox, C., Mouw, J.T. Disruption of the representativeness heuristic: Can we be perturbed into using correct probabilistic reasoning?. Educ Stud Math 23, 163–178 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00588054

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00588054

Keywords

Navigation