Skip to main content
Log in

Changes in microbial biomass, respiration and nutrient status of beech (Fagus sylvatica) leaf litter processed by millipedes (Glomeris marginata)

  • Community Ecology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of processing of beech leaf litter (Fagus sylvatica L.) of different ages by the diplopodGlomeris marginata (Villers) on status and turnover of microorganisms was investigated in the laboratory. Microbial biomass, basal respiration and metabolic quotient of litter-material from three different beechwood sites of a basalt hill forming a gradient from basalt (upper part of the hill) to limestone (lower part of the hill) were determined each season (February, May, August and November). The same microbial parameters were also measured after these litter materials had been processed byG. marginata (faecal pellets of an average age of 4 days). Short-term changes in microbial biomass and respiration in leaf material and faecal pellets from February and August were investigated after 1, 2, 5, 10, 20 and 40 days of incubation. The ergosterol content of August samples was determined. Processing of beech leaf litter byG. marginata increased microbial biomass in February and May but reduced microbial biomass in August and November. It was concluded that processing of litter materials in February and May increased accessibility of carbon resources to microorganisms by fragmentation. In contrast, in litter materials from August and November carbon resources were depleted and fragmentation by diplopods did not increase availability of carbon resources. Addition of carbon (glucose) and nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) to litter and faecal pellets indicated that processing of beech litter reduced nutrient deficiency of the microflora. Ergosterol content in faecal pellets was reduced strongly after beech leaf litter processing byG. marginata, indicating a decrease in fungal biomass. Presumably, in faecal pellets bacteria flourished at the expense of fungi.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson JM (1987) Interactions between invertebrates and microorganisms — noise or neccessity for soil processes? In: Fletcher M, Gray TRG, Jones JG (eds) Ecology of microbial communities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 125–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JM, Bignell DE (1980) Bacteria in the food, gut contents and faeces of the litter-feeding millipedeGlomeris marginata (Villers). Soil Biol Biochem 12: 251–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JM, Bignell DE (1982) Assimilation of14C-labelled leaf fibre by the millipedeGlomeris marginata (Diplopoda, Glomeridae). Pedobiologia 23: 120–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JM, Ineson P (1983) Interactions between soil arthropods and microorganisms in carbon, nitrogen and mineral element fluxes from decomposing leaf litter. In: Lee JA, McNeill S, Rorison IH (eds) Nitrogen as an ecological factor. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 413–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JM, Ineson P (1984) Interactions between microorganisms and soil invertebrates in nutrient flux pathways of forest ecosystems. In: Anderson JM, Rayner ADM, Walton DHW (eds) Invertebrate-microbial interactions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 59–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JM, Ineson P, Huish SA (1983) Nitrogen and cation mobilization by soil fauna feeding on leaf litter and soil organic matter from deciduous woodlands. Soil Biol Biochem 15: 463–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JM, Rayner ADM, Walton DWH (1984) Invertebrate-microbial interactions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JPE, Domsch KH (1978) A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soils. Soil Biol Biochem 10: 215–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JPE, Domsch KH (1980) Quantities of plant nutrients in the microbial biomass of selected soils. Soil Sci 130: 211–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson TH, Domsch KH (1990) Application of eco-physiological quotients (qCO2 andqD) on microbial biomasses from soils of different cropping histories. Soil Biol Biochem 22: 251–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson TH, Domsch KH (1993) The metabolic quotient for CO2 (qCO2) as a specific activity parameter to assess the effects of environmental conditions, such as pH, on the microbial biomass of forest soils. Soil Biol Biochem 25: 393–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Bano K (1992) The role of the millipedeJonespeltis splendidus Verhoeff in an ecosystem (Diplopoda, Polydesmida, Paradoxosomatidae). Ber Naturwiss Med Ver Innsbruck 10: 327–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargali SS, Singh SP, Singh RP (1993) Patterns of weight loss and nutrient release from decomposing leaf litter in an age series of eucalypt plantations. Soil Biol Biochem 25: 1731–1738

    Google Scholar 

  • Beare MH, Neely CL, Coleman DC, Hargrove WL (1990) A substrate-induced respiration (SIR) method for measurement of fungal and bacterial biomass on plant residues. Soil Biol Biochem 22: 585–594

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg B, Staaf H (1980) Decomposition rate and chemical changes of Scots pine needle litter. II. Influence of chemical composition. In: Persson T (ed) Structure and function of northern coniferous forests — an ecosystem study. Ecol Bull 32: 373–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocock KL (1963) The digestion and assimilation of food byGlomeris. In: Doeksen J, Van der Drift J (eds) Soil organisms. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 85–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel O (1991) Leaf litter consumption and assimilation by juveniles ofLumbricus terrestris L. (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae) under different environmental conditions. Biol Fert Soils 12: 202–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson DH (1976) Assimilation efficiencies of slugs on different food materials. Oecologia 26: 267–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis MW, Lamar RT (1992) Evaluation of methods to extract ergosterol for quantitation of soil fungal biomass. Soil Biol Biochem 24: 189–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Djajakirana G, Joergensen RG, Meyer B (1996) Ergosterol and microbial biomass relationships in soil. Biol Fert Soils 22 (in press)

  • Gere G (1956) The examination of the feeding biology and the humificative function of diplopoda and isopoda. Acta Biol Hung 6: 257–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Gessner MO, Bauchrowitz MA, Escautier M (1991) Extraction and quantification of ergosterol as a measure of fungal biomass in leaf litter. Microb Ecol 22: 285–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghilarov MS (1963) On the interrelations between soil dwelling invertebrates and soil microorganisms. In: Doeksen J, Van der Drift J (eds) Soil organisms. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 255–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanlon RDG (1981a) Influence of Collembola on the activity of senescent fungal colonies grown on media of different nutrient concentration. Oikos 36: 362–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanlon RDG (1981b) Some factors influencing microbial growth on soil animal faeces. I. Bacterial and fungal growth on particulate oak leaf litter. Pedobiologia 21: 257–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanlon RDG, Anderson JM (1980) Influence of macroarthropod feeding activities on microflora in decomposing oak leaves. Soil Biol Biochem 12: 255–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassall M, Rushton SP (1984) Feeding behaviour of terrestrial isopods in relation to plant defences and microbial activity. Symp Zool Soc Lond 53: 487–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassall M, Turner JG, Rands MRW (1987) Effects of terrestrial isopods on the decomposition of woodland leaf litter. Oecologia 72: 597–604

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedlund K, Augustsson A (1995) Effects of enchytraeid grazing on fungal growth and respiration. Soil Biol Biochem 27: 905–909

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkin SP, Read HJ (1992) The biology of millipedes. Oxford Science, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hund K, Schenk B (1994) The microbial respiratory quotient as indicator for bioremediation processes. Chemosphere 28: 477–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Ineson P, Anderson JM (1985) Aerobically isolated bacteria associated with the gut and faeces of the litter feeding macroarthropodsOniscus asellus andGlomeris marginata. Soil Biol Biochem 17: 843–849

    Google Scholar 

  • Insam H (1990) Are the soil microbial biomass and basal respiration governed by the climatic regime? Soil Biol Biochem 22: 525–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen V (1974) Decomposition of Angiosperm tree leaf litter. In: Dickinson CH, Pugh GJF (eds) Biology of plant litter decomposition. Academic Press, London, pp 69–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Jocteur Monrozier L, Robin AM (1988) Action de la faune du sol sur une litière de feuille: application de techniques pyrolytiques a l'étude des modifications subies par les feuilles de charme (Carpinus betulus) ingérées parGlomeris marginata. Rev Ecol Biol Sol 25: 203–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Joergensen R (1991) Organic matter and nutrient dynamics of the litter layer on a forest Rendzina under beech. Biol Fert Soils 11: 163–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard MJ, Anderson JM (1991) Grazing interactions between a collembolan and fungi in a leaf litter matrix. Pedobiologia 35: 239–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Lussenhop J (1992) Mechanisms of microarthropod-microbial interactions in soil. In: Begon M, Fitter AH (eds) Advances in ecological research. Academic Press, London, pp 1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Maraun M, Scheu S (1995) Influence of beech litter fragmentation and glucose concentration on the microbial biomass in three different litter layers of a beechwood. Biol Fert Soils 19: 155–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuzzi G (1970) Experimental observations on the role ofGlomeris spp. (Myriapoda, Diplopoda) in the process of humification of litter. Pedobiologia 10: 401–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell SY, Arsuffi TL, Fallon RD (1988) Fundamental procedures for determining ergosterol content of decaying plant material by liquid chromatography. Appl Environ Microbiol 54: 1876–1879

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson PB, Bocock KL, Heal OW (1966) Studies on the decomposition of the faecal pellets of a millipede (Glomeris marginata (Villers)). J Ecol 54: 755–766

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolai V (1988) Phenolic and mineral content of leaves influences decomposition in European forest ecosystems. Oecologia 75: 575–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson K, Bjurman J (1990) Estimation of mycelial biomass by determination of the ergosterol content of wood decayed byConiophora puteanea andFomes fomentarius. Mater Org 25: 275–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Nykvist N (1962) Leaching and decomposition of litter. V. Experiments on leaf litter ofAlnus glutinosus, Fagus sylvatica andQuercus robur. Oikos 13: 232–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum EP (1971) Fundamentals of ecology. Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirt SJ (1975) Principles of microbe and cell cultivation. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross DJ (1980) Evaluation of a physiological method for measuring microbial biomass in soils from grasslands and maize fields. N Z J Sci 23: 229–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakwa WN (1974) A consideration of the chemical basis of food preferences in millipedes. In: Blower JG (ed) Myriapoda. Academic Press, London, pp 329–346

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (1985) SAS User's Guide: version 5 edn. SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer M (1991) Secondary production and decomposition. In: Röhrig E, Ulrich B (eds) Ecosystems of the world. 7. Temperate deciduous forests. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 175–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheu S (1987) Microbial activity and nutrient dynamics in earthworm casts (Lumbricidae). Biol Fert Soils 5: 230–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheu S (1992) Automated measurement of the respiratory response of soil microcompartments: active microbial biomass in earthworm faeces. Soil Biol Biochem 24: 1113–1118

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheu S (1993) Analysis of the microbial nutrient status in soil microcompartments: earthworm faeces from a basalt-limestone gradient. In: Brussard L, Kooistra MJ (eds) International workshop on methods of research on soil structure/soil biota interrelationships. Geoderma 56: 575–586

  • Scheu S (1994) There is an earthworm mobilizable nitrogen pool in soil. Pedobiologia 38: 243–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheu S, Parkinson D (1994a) Changes in bacterial and fungal biomass, bacterial and fungal biovolume and ergosterol content after drying, remoistening and incubation of different layers of cool temperate forest soils. Soil Biol Biochem 26: 1515–1525

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheu S, Parkinson D (1994b) Effects of earthworms on nutrient dynamics, carbon turnover and microorganisms in soils from cool temperate forests of the Canadian Rocky Mountains — laboratory studies. Appl Soil Ecol 1: 113–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheu S, Parkinson D (1995) Successional changes in microbial biomass, respiration and nutrient status during litter decomposition in an aspen and pine forest (Canada, Alberta). Biol Fert Soils 19: 327–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholle G, Joergensen RG, Wolters V (1993) Mikrobieller Biomasse-Kohlenstoff und Ergosterol in einem natürlichen und einem gekalktem Moderprofil: “litter-bag”-Experiment zur Wirkung der Mesofauna. Mitt Dtsch Bodenkdl Gesellsch 72: 627–630

    Google Scholar 

  • Seitz LM, Mohr HE, Burroughs R, Sauer DB (1977) Ergosterol as an indicator of fungal invasions in grain. Cereal Chem 54: 1207–1217

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith T, Brown J (1932) Methods for determining carbon dioxide production in soils. Univ Iowa Agric Exp Stat Res Bull 147: 27–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Standen V (1978) The influence of soil fauna on decomposition by microorganisms in blanket bog litter. J Anim Ecol 47: 25–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Stotzky G (1960) A simple method for the determination of the respiratory quotient of soils. Can J Microbiol 6: 439–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Striganova BR (1971) A comparative account of the activity of different groups of soil invertebrates in the decomposition of forest litter. Soviet J Ecol 2: 316–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift MJ, Heal OW, Anderson JM (1979) Decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Teuben A (1991) Nutrient availability and interactions between soil arthropods and microorganisms during decomposition of coniferous litter: a mesocosm study. Biol Fert Soils 10: 256–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Teuben A, Roelofsma TAPJ (1990) Dynamic interactions between functional groups of soil arthropods and microorganisms during decomposition of coniferous litter in microcosm experiments. Biol Fert Soils 9: 145–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Teuben A, Verhoef HA (1992) Direct contribution by soil arthropods to nutrient availability through body and faecal nutrient content. Biol Fert Soils 14: 71–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wensem J, Verhoef HA, Van Straalen NM (1993) Litter degradation stage as a prime factor for isopod interaction with mineralization processes. Soil Biol Biochem 25: 1175–1183

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser S, Whittaker JB, Parkinson D (1981) Effects of collembolan grazing on nutrient release and respiration of a leaf litter inhabiting fungus. Soil Biol Biochem 13: 215–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolters V (1991a) Soil invertebrates — Effects on nutrient turnover and soil structure — a review. Z Pflanzenernähr Bodenkd 154: 389–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolters V (1991b) Biological processes in two beech forest soils treated with simulated acid rain — a laboratory experiment withIsotoma tigrina (Insecta, Collembola). Soil Biol Biochem 23: 381–390

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maraun, M., Scheu, S. Changes in microbial biomass, respiration and nutrient status of beech (Fagus sylvatica) leaf litter processed by millipedes (Glomeris marginata). Oecologia 107, 131–140 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00582243

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00582243

Key words

Navigation