Abstract
The surface tension of mercury on a glass substrate has been determined by the sessile drop technique. It was found that the uncorrected value of surface tension varied with changes in the drop diameter in the range from 0.60 to 4.10 cm. From the Worthington equation for curvature a corrected surface tension of 456 dyn/cm was obtained for the 4.1 cm diameter drop, a value which is in reasonable agreement with previous investigations. However, application of a curve fitting procedure to the results from the smaller drops gave a corrected surface tension which was approximately independent of diameter but at a smaller average value of 413 dyn/cm. The surface tension of a 1.20 cm diameter drop was also measured on tungsten and molybdenum substrates and, in general, corrected values larger than on glass were derived. It is suggested that the small corrected values obtained for drops ⩽2.06 cm in diameter are due to adsorption of impurity from the glass substrate.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R. S. Burdon, “Surface tension” (Cambridge University Press, 1949).
H. Gibson,Proc. Roy. Soc. S. Aust,56 (1932) 51.
A. M. Worthington,Phil. Mag. 20 (1885) 51.
C. Kemball,Trans. Faraday Soc. 42 (1946) 526.
M. E. Nicholas, P. A. Joyner, B. M. Tessem, andM. D. Olson,J. Phys. Chem. 65 (1961) 1373.
F. Bashforth andJ. C. Adams, “An attempt to test the theories of capillary action” (Cambridge University Press, 1883).
N. E. Dorsey,J. Washington Acad. Sci. 18 (1928) 505.
W. D. Kingery andM. Humerick,J. Phys. Chem. 57 (1953) 359.
C. A. Smolders andE. M. Duyvis,Rec. Trav. chim. 80 (1961) 635.
J. H. Butler andB. H. Bloom,Surface Sci. 4 (1960) 1.
W. M. Robertson andG. W. Lehman,J. Appl. Phys. 39 (1968) 1994.
T. Iredale,Phil. Mag. 45 (1923) 1088.
H. O. Puls,ibid 22 (1936) 970.
R. C. L. Bosworth,Trans. Faraday Soc. 34 (1938) 1501.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bonfield, W. Surface tension of mercury on glass, molybdenum and tungsten substrates. J Mater Sci 7, 148–152 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00554174
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00554174