Abstract
Our environmental concerns prompt launching large monitoring programs. Examining the history and accomplishments of similar endeavors is the best way to avoid errors. One lesson taught by the oldest and largest survey of national renewable resources in the United States, the Forest Inventory and Analysis Program, is that the program itself is not capable of learning from its errors. Among other problems that beset big programs are unrealistic promises. It is not possible to inventory “every animal and plant species in the United States and their habitats” as the newly created National Biological Survey vows to do. Even if it were possible, this would hardly help to attain the ultimate goal of the Survey, survival of all species. In his request to fund the Survey, Secretary of the Interior, Bruce Babbitt, compared the conflict between economic development and environmental integrity with train wrecks. This metaphor is as brilliant as it is deceitful. Its brilliance, attested by the success with the press and legislature, is in a vivid and blithe image suggesting that, given sufficient information, the conflict could be averted. After all, railroad accidents are rare and avoidable exceptions. This hopeful situation cannot be honestly compared with the plight of our environment. The crucial piece of information — that there is no spare track for economic development — is readily available. Our population and economic growth take place in the same space that has already been fully occupied by other species. To be trustworthy, monitoring programs should face the reality that development necessitates environmental degradation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anonymous [no date]: ‘The Blue Ribbon’, Panel report on forest inventory and analysis. [No place of publisher. Pages are unnumbered.]
Bechtold, W.A., Ruark, G.A. and Lloyd, F.T.: 1991, ‘Changing Stand Structure and Regional Growth Reductions in Georgia's Natural Pine Stands’, For. Sci. 37, 703–717.
Cleveland, G.D., Haines, L.W., Jahromi, S.T. and Bryant, R.L.: 1992, ‘No Evidence of Growth Decline in International Paper's Southern Commercial Loblolly and Slash Pine Forests’, in R.B. Flagler (Ed.), The Response of Southern Commercial Forests to Air Pollution, Transactions of the Air & Waste Management Association, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 37–47.
Fox, S., Joyner, K.C. and Bartuska, A.M.: 1992, ‘Overview of the Southern Commercial Forest Research Cooperative’, in R.B. Flagler (Ed.), The Response of Southern Commercial Forests to Air Pollution, Transactions of the Air & Waste Management Association, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 1–15.
Gertner, G.: 1991, ‘Comment II on Changing Stand Structure and Regional Growth reductions in Georgia's Natural Pine Stands’, For Sci. 37, 723–725.
Gore, A.: 1992, Earth in the Balance, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 407 pp.
Green, E.J.: 1992, ‘Assessing Forest Growth with Point Sampling Data’, Conservation Biology 6, 296–297.
Huckaby, L.S. (Ed.): 1993, ‘Lichens as Bioindicators of Air Quality’, USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-224, 131 pp.
Hyink, D.M.: 1991, ‘Comment I on Changing Stand Structure and Regional Growth Reductions in Georgia's Natural Pine Stands’, For. Sci. 37, 718–722.
Insarov, G.E.L., Filippova, M. and Semenov S.M.: 1986, ‘The Methods of Assessment of Epiphytic Lichenoflora in Relation to Background Pollution’, in Yu.A. Izrael (Ed.), Research on Environmental Pollution and Its Effects on the Biosphere. Proc. of UNESCO MAB Project 14 Conference, Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, pp. 127–131 [in Russian].
Jordan, D.N. and Lockaby, B.G.: 1990, ‘Time Series Modelling of Relationship between Climate and Long-Term Radial Growth of Loblolly Pine’. Can. J. For. Res. 20, 738–742.
Jukola-Sulonen, E.L., Mikkola, K. Nevalainen, S. and Yli-Kojola, H.: 1987, ‘Vitality of Conifers in Finland, 1985–1986’, Research Bulletin of the Finnish Forest Research Institute. ILME Project, Helsinki, 30 pp.
Lucier, A.A. and Barnard, J.E.: 1992, ‘Integration of Epidemiological and Mechanistic Studies of Southern Pine Health and Air Quality Effects’, in R.B. Flagler (Ed.). The Response of Southern Commercial Forests to Air Pollution, Transactions of the Air & Waste Management Association, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 49–79.
Mandelbrot, B.B.: 1983, The Fractal Geometry of Nature, W.N. Freeman, New York, 468 pp.
McLaughlin, S.B.: 1988, ‘Oak Ridge National Laboratory Studies on Forest Decline’, in B. Krahl-Urban et al. (Eds.), Forest Decline, Julich Nuclear Research Center for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and German Ministry of Research and Technology, Koln, F.R.G., pp. 112–113.
Pinchot, G.: 1919, ‘The Lines are Drawn’, J. For. 17, 899–900.
Ruark, G.A., Thomas, C.E. Bechtold, W.A. and May, D.M.: 1991, ‘Growth Reductions in Naturally Regenerated Southern Pine Stands in Alabama and Georgia’, South. J. Appl. For. 15(2), 73–79.
Schumacher, F.X. and Coile, T.S.: 1960, Growth and Yields of Natural Stands of the Southern Pines, T.S. Coile, Inc., Durham, N.C., 115 pp.
Sheffield, R.M. and Cost, N.D.: 1987, ‘Behind the Decline’, J. For. 85, 29–33.
Sheffield, R.M., Cost, N.D., Bechtold, W.A. and McClure, J.P.: 1985, ‘Pine Growth Reductions in the Southeast’, USDA Forest Service Resource Bull. SE-83, 112 pp.
Stone, R.: 1993, ‘Babbitt Shakes Up Science at Interior’, Science 261, 976–978.
Stout, B.B.: 1993, ‘The Good, the Bad and the Ugly of Monitoring Programs: Defining Questions and Establishing Objectives’, Environ. Monit. Assess. 26, 91–98.
Suzuki, T.: 1987, ‘Review of Japanese Literature’, Newsletter of the IUFRO Subject Group 6.02, Statistical Methods, Mathematics and Computers, pp. 6–10. December.
USDA: 1985, Field Instructions for the Southeast. USDA Forest Service. Southeastern Forest Experiment Station. Asheville, N.C.
U.S. Department of the Interior Budget Justification: 1994, The National Biological Survey, 51 pp.
West, D.C., Doyle, T.W., Tharp, M.L., Beauchamp, J.J., Platt, W.J. and Downing, D.J.: 1993, ‘Recent Growth Increases in Old-Growth Longleaf Pine’, Can. J. For. Res. 23, 846–853.
Wilson, E.O.: 1991, ‘Foreword’, in M.L. Oldfield and J.B. Alcorn (Eds.), Biodiversity, Wesview Press, Boulder, CO, pp. XVII-XVIII.
Zeide, B.: 1985a, ‘Distance to Point-sampled Trees and Their Diameters’, Forest Ecology and Management 11, 131–137.
Zeide, B.: 1985b, ‘How Much Space Does a Seedling Need?’, Forest Ecology and Management 11, 225–229.
Zeide, B.: 1992a, ‘Reevaluation of Forest Inventory Data From Loblolly Pine Stands in the Georgia, Piedmont and Mountain Areas’, in R.B. Flagler (Ed.), The Response of Southern Commercial Forests to Air Pollution, Transactions of the Air & Waste Management Association, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 17–35.
Zeide, B.: 1992b, ‘Has Pine Growth Declined in the Southeastern United States?’, Conservation Biology 6, 185–195.
Zeide, B.: 1993a, ‘A Parsimonious Number of Growth Curves’, Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 10, 132–136.
Zeide, B.: 1993b, ‘Primary Unit of the Tree Crown’, Ecology 74, 1598–1602.
Zeide, B. and Gresham, C.A.: 1991, ‘Fractal Dimensions of Tree Crowns in Three Loblolly Pine Plantations of Coastal South Carolina’, Canadian Journal of Forest Research 21, 1208–1212.
Zeide, B. and Pfeifer P.: 1991, ‘A Method for Estimation of Fractal Dimension of Tree Crowns’, Forest Science 37, 1253–1265.
Zeide, B. and Troxell J.: 1979a, ‘Selection of the Proper Metric BAF for Appalachian Mixed Hardwoods’, in W.E. Frayer (Ed.), Forest Resource Inventories, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, pp. 261–269.
Zeide, B. and Troxell, J.: 1979b, ‘Plot Versus Point Sampling’, in W.E. Frayer (Ed.), Forest Resources Inventories, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, pp. 923–929.
Zeide, B., Troxell, J. and Haag, D.: 1979, ‘Field Instruction in Point Sampling’, in W.E. Frayer (Ed.), Forest Resource Inventories, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, pp. 917–922.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zeide, B. Big projects, big problems. Environ Monit Assess 33, 115–133 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00548593
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00548593