Skip to main content
Log in

Relationship between microstructure, hardness and electrical conductivity of 2219 aluminium

  • Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A TEM study of unstretched, heat-treated aluminium alloy 2219 was performed with the aim of correlating the microstructure with hardness (H) and eddy current conductivity (C) data. Recently Chihoski has developed a new method of evaluating heat treatments of aluminium alloys by constructing in an H-C field a “sail” formed by a network of curved coordinate lines of quenching and ageing times. In this paper it is shown that a pair of H-C values, as represented by a point in the “sail” is uniquely related to the microstructure. The hardness after quenching (zero ageing) depends on the amount of primary θ′- and θ-phases developed during quenching, and decreases with increased precipitate incoherency and size. Upon ageing at 190° C, H first increases due to precipitation of coherent zones and phases (e.g. GP(1) and θ″), then decreases after a θ″→θ′ transformation mainly due to changes in their relative population and, to a much lesser degree, due to loss of coherency in the θ′. The conductivity is mainly a function of the copper solute concentration in the matrix, and increases significantly only when copper is drained from the matrix to form θ′ and θ. The study supports Chihoski's conclusion that construction of a “sail” for a given aluminium alloy provides a quick, nondestructive method for determination of precipitation processes, and can be very useful in quality control, failure analysis and metallurgical research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Chihoski, Proceedings of the DARPA Conference on Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE, San Diego, August 1982 (Plenum Publishing Co., 1982).

  2. Idem, Met. Prog. 123 (6) (1963) 27.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. Hornbogen, Aluminium 43 (1967) 164.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. B. Nicholson and J. Nutting, Phil. Mag. 3 (1958) 531.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. YoshidA, D. J. H. Cockayne and M. J. Whelan, ibid. 34 (1976) 89.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Guinier, J. Phys. Radium 8 (iii) (1942) 124.

    Google Scholar 

  7. V. A. Phillips, Acta Metall. 23 (1975) 751.

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. Swartzendurber et al., NBS Report NBSIR 80-2069, December 1980.

  9. C. Laird and H. I. Aaronson, Acta Metall. 14 (1966) 121.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. C. Weatherly and R. B. Nicholson, Phil. Mag. 17 (1968) 801.

    Google Scholar 

  11. F. Fouquet, P. Merle M. Kohen J. Merlin and P. F. Gobin, Acta Metall 27 (1979) 315.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. M. Papazian, Met. Trans. A 12A (1981) 269.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Rosen, E. Horowitz, S. Fick, R. C. Reno and R. Mehrabian, Mater. Sci. Eng. 53 (1982) 163.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Natan, M., Chihoski, R.A. Relationship between microstructure, hardness and electrical conductivity of 2219 aluminium. J Mater Sci 18, 3288–3298 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00544153

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00544153

Keywords

Navigation