Abstract
A model which explains the trapping of hydrogen around or near helium bubbles is presented. According to this model, hydrogen atoms are attracted toward the bubbles due to positive stresses created by the very high pressure (350 kbar) existing inside the bubbles. The extreme trapping energy of hydrogen atoms around helium bubbles has been theoretically calculated and found to be 0.71 eV atom−1. It is shown that most of the hydrogen atoms are trapped in a very small volume located very close to the bubble surface. The total hydrogen quantity was found to be in the range of 45–76 atoms per bubble for a wide range of hydrogen atom concentration, C∞. The good agreement between the theoretical results and data based on many experimental measurements reinforces the assumptions underlying the very basis of the suggested mechanism. The model proposed in this study can lead to better understanding of failure mechanisms.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
E. V. Kornelsen, Can. J. Phys. 48 (1970) 2812.
M. I. Baskes and W. D. Wilson, Phys. Rev. B 27 (1983) 2210.
M. I. Baskes, R. H. J. Fastenau, P. Penning, L. M. Caspers and A. Van Veen, J. Nucl. Mat. 102 (1981) 235.
G. J. Thomas, W. A. Swansiger and M. I. Baskes, J. Appl. Phys. 50 (1979) 1942.
G. J. Thomas and R. Bastasz, ibid. 52 (1981) 6426.
T. Asaoka, G. Lapasett, M. Aucouturier and P. Lacombe, Corrosion 34 (1978) 39.
M. Aucouturier, G. Lapasett and T. Asaoka, Metallography 11 (1978) 5.
G. M. Pressouyre and I. M. Bernstein, Metall. Trans. 9A (1978) 1571.
S. M. Myers, S. T. Picraux and R. E. Stoltz, J. Appl. Phys. 50 (1979) 5710.
S. M. Myers and W. R. Wampler, J. Nucl. Mat. 111 and 112 (1982) 579.
G. M. Pressouyre, Metall. Trans. 10A (1979) 1571.
J. P. Hirth, ibid. 11A (1980) 861.
G. M. Pressouyre, ibid. 14A (1983) 2189.
Idem, in Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Environmental Degradation of Engineering Materials, Blacksburg, Virginia, 1981, p. 175.
S. M. Myers, D. M. Follstaedt, F. Besenbacher and J. Bottiger, J. Appl. Phys. 53 (1982) 8734.
P. B. Johnson and D. J. Mazey, Radd. Eff. 53 (1980) 195.
W. Jager, R. Manzke, H. Trinkaus, R. Zeller, J. Fink and G. Crecelius, ibid. 78 (1983) 315.
F. Besenbacher, J. Bottiger and S. M. Myers, J. Appl. Phys. 53 (1982) 3547.
S. E. Donnelly, A. A. Lucas, J. P. Vigneron and J. C. Rife, Radd. Eff. 78 (1983) 377.
D. A. Young, A. K. McMahan and M. Ross, Phys. Rev. B 24 (1981) 5119.
A. E. Pontau, M. I. Baskes, K. L. Wilson, L. G. Haggmark, J. Bohdansky, B. M. U. Scherzer and J. Roth, J. Nucl. Mater. 111 and 112 (1982) 651.
E. Abramov and D. Eliezer, J. Mater. Sci. Lett. (in press).
R. Hill, in “The Mathematical Theory of Plasticity” (Oxford University Press) p. 97.
J. C. M. Li, R. A. Oriani and L. S. Darken, J. Phys. Chem. (N.F.) 49 (1966) 271.
R. A. Oriani, in Proceedings of Conference on Fundamental Aspects of Stress Corrosion Cracking, Ohio State University, NACE 1967, p. 32.
R. A. Oriani, Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME 236 (1966) 1368.
D. T. Peterson and H. M. Herro, Metall. Trans. 14A (1983) 17.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abramov, E., Eliezer, D. Hydrogen trapping in helium damaged metals: a theoretical approach. J Mater Sci 27, 2595–2598 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540674
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540674