Skip to main content
Log in

Philosophical criticism: Its nature and function

  • Comment
  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper attempts to outline briefly a case for philosophers' critical attention to one's work, even when, indeed especially when, that attention is a line-by-line analysis of a single paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Davson-Galle, P.: 1990a, ‘Interpreting Arguments and Judging Issues’, Informal Logic 21, 41–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davson-Galle, P.: 1990b, ‘Applied Ethics and Metaphilosophy’, Philosophy in Context 20, 37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasersfeld, von E.: 1989, ‘Cognition, Construction of Knowledge, and Teaching’, Synthese 80(1), 121–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. & Davson-Galle, P.: 1992, ‘Constructivism & Science Education: Some Cautions and Comments’, in S. Hills (ed.), History & Philosophy of Science & Science Education (Vol. II), Queen's University, Kingston, 121–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutching, W.: 1992, ‘Constructivism Deconstructed’, Science & Education 1(3), 223–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vicentini, M.: 1992, ‘Constructivism’, Science & Education 1(4), 395.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davson-Galle, P. Philosophical criticism: Its nature and function. Sci Educ 3, 311–315 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540159

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540159

Keywords

Navigation