Advertisement

Science & Education

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 311–315 | Cite as

Philosophical criticism: Its nature and function

  • Peter Davson-Galle
Comment
  • 59 Downloads

Abstract

This paper attempts to outline briefly a case for philosophers' critical attention to one's work, even when, indeed especially when, that attention is a line-by-line analysis of a single paper.

Keywords

Single Paper Critical Attention Philosophical Criticism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Davson-Galle, P.: 1990a, ‘Interpreting Arguments and Judging Issues’, Informal Logic 21, 41–45.Google Scholar
  2. Davson-Galle, P.: 1990b, ‘Applied Ethics and Metaphilosophy’, Philosophy in Context 20, 37–52.Google Scholar
  3. Glasersfeld, von E.: 1989, ‘Cognition, Construction of Knowledge, and Teaching’, Synthese 80(1), 121–140.Google Scholar
  4. Matthews, M. & Davson-Galle, P.: 1992, ‘Constructivism & Science Education: Some Cautions and Comments’, in S. Hills (ed.), History & Philosophy of Science & Science Education (Vol. II), Queen's University, Kingston, 121–134.Google Scholar
  5. Sutching, W.: 1992, ‘Constructivism Deconstructed’, Science & Education 1(3), 223–254.Google Scholar
  6. Vicentini, M.: 1992, ‘Constructivism’, Science & Education 1(4), 395.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Davson-Galle
    • 1
  1. 1.Education DepartmentUniversity of TasmaniaLauncestonAustralia

Personalised recommendations