Abstract
This interpretive investigation of curricular change involved Karl, a middle school science teacher. Initially, he made sense of his and student roles in terms of objectivism and the teacher having control. When Karl had opportunities to observe the teaching of a colleague he began to consider changes in his teaching. The referents used to frame alternative teacher and student roles were students having greater autonomy for their actions and constructivism. However, constraints, such as shortage of time and beliefs of colleagues and students favored the retention of traditional practices. Although Karl's commitment to change was sufficiently strong to ensure that changes would be attempted, old belief sets and associated practices, restraints, and new belief sets and associated practices co-existed in a dialectical relationship. Effecting meaningful change necessitated teacher learning and sustaining of new equilibria between a complex array of interacting sociocultural factors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abell, S. & Smith, D.: 1992, ‘What is Science? Preservice Elementary Teachers Conceptions of the Nature of Science’, in S. Hills (ed.), Proceedings of the Second International History and Philosophy of Science and Science Teaching Conference. Kingston, Ontario, Canada: Queen's University, pp. 11–22.
Abelson, R.: 1979, ‘Differences Between Belief Systems and Knowledge Systems’, Cognitive Science 3, 355–366.
Briscoe, C.: 1991, Cognitive Frameworks and Classroom Practices: A Case Study of Teacher Learning and Change. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
Cronbach, L.J.: 1975, ‘Beyond the Two Disciplines of Scientific Psychology’, American Psychologist 30, 116–127.
Cornett, J. W., Yeotis, C. & Terwillinger, L.: 1990, ‘Teacher Personal Practice Theories and Their Influences Upon Teacher Curricular and Instructional Actions: A Case Study of a Secondary Science Teacher’, Science Education 74(5), 517–530.
Dana, T.M.: 1992, Achieving Comprehensive Curriculum Reform: An Analysis of the Implementation of a Mathematics and Science Education Policy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
Eisenhart, M.A., Shrum, J.L., Harding, J.R. & Cuthbert, A.M.: 1988, ‘Teacher Beliefs: Definitions, Findings and Directions’, Educational Policy 2(1), 51–70.
Erickson, F.: 1986, ‘Qualitative Research on Teaching’, in M.C. Wittrock (ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching, third edition, MacMillan, New York, pp. 119–161.
Floden, R.E.: 1985, ‘The Role of Rhetoric in Changing Teachers' Beliefs’, Teaching and Teacher Education 1(1), 19–32.
Geertz, C.: 1973, The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books, New York, NY.
Guba, E. & Lincoln, Y.S.: 1989, Fourth Generation Evaluation. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
Grundy, S.: 1987, Curriculum: Product or Praxis? Falmer Press, London.
Johnson, M.: 1987, The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Kagan, D.: 1992, ‘Implication of Research on Teacher Belief’. Educational Psychologist 27(1), 65–90.
Magoon, A.J.: 1977, ‘Constructivist Approaches in Educational Research’, Review of Educational Research 47(4), 651–693.
National Commission on Excellence in Education: 1983, A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC.
National Science Teachers Association: 1989, Essential Changes in Secondary Science: Scope, Sequence and Coordination, NSTA, Washington, DC.
Nespor, J.: 1987, ‘The Role of Beliefs in the Practice of Teaching’, Journal of Curriculum Studies 19(4), 317–328.
Strauss, A.L.: 1987, Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Tippins, D.J., Tobin, K. & Hook, K.: 1993, ‘Dealing With Dilemmas of Laboratory Science: Making Sense of Safety From a Constructivist Perspective’, International Journal of Science Education 15(1), 45–59.
Tobin, K.: 1993, ‘Referents for Making Sense of Science Teaching’. International Journal of Science Education 15(3), 241–254.
Tobin, K.: 1980, ‘The Effect of an Extended Wait Time on Science Achievement’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 17, 469–475.
Tobin, K. & Espinet, M.: 1989, ‘Impediments to Change: An Application of Peer Coaching in High School Science’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 26(2), 105–120.
Tobin, K. & Fraser, B.J. (eds.): 1987, Exemplary Practice in Science and Mathematics Education, Curtin University of Technology, Perth.
Tobin, K. & Gallagher, J.J.: 1987, ‘What Happens in High School Science Classrooms?’ Journal of Curriculum Studies 19, 549–560.
Tobin, K., Kahle, J.B. & Fraser, B.J. (eds.): 1990, Windows into Science Classrooms: Problems Associated With Higher-Level Learning, Falmer Press, London.
Weiss, I.S.: 1987, Report of the 1985–1986 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education, National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tobin, K.G., Tippins, D.J. & Hook, K. Referents for changing a science curriculum: A case study of one teacher's change in beliefs. Sci Educ 3, 245–264 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540156
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540156