Advertisement

Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology

, Volume 314, Issue 2, pp 135–139 | Cite as

Methyldopa produces central inhibition of parasympathetic activity in the cat

  • M. C. Koss
Article

Summary

α-Methyldopa (10–100 mg/kg i.v.) produced a dose-dependent pupillary dilation in anaesthetized cats which was antagonized by subsequent administration of yohimbine hydrochloride (0.5 mg/kg i.v.). The peak effects were observed approximately 2–3h after injection. This α-methyldopa-induced mydriasis was present only when the parasympathetic innervation to the iris was intact. Prior treatment with yohimbine (0.5 mg/kg i.v.) 30 min before α-methyldopa also antagonized the mydriatic effect, whereas pretreatment with phenoxybenzamine (2.5 mg/kg i.v.) did not. In contrast, phenoxybenzamine, but not yohimbine, effectively antagonized the pupillary dilation produced by adrenaline (0.3–10.0 μg/kg i.v.). These results suggest that α-methyldopa produces mydriasis in the cat by means of CNS inhibition of tonic outflow from the oculomotor nucleus and that an α-adrenergic inhibitory mechanism may be involved. This conclusion is supported further by experiments in which direct measurements of ciliary nerve activity were made.

Key words

α-Methyldopa Pupil diameter Yohimbine Phenoxybenzamine Adrenaline Parasympathectomized iris Ciliary nerve recordings 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Finch L, Haeusler G (1973) Further evidence for a central hypotensive action of α-methyldopa in both the rat and cat. Br J Pharmacol 47:217–228Google Scholar
  2. Gherezghiher T, Koss MC (1979) Clonidine mydriasis in the rat. Eur J Pharmacol 57:263–266Google Scholar
  3. Haeusler G (1973) Activation of the central pathway of the baroreceptor reflex, a possible mechanism of the hypotensive action of clonidine. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 278:231–246Google Scholar
  4. Haeusler G (1974) Clonidine-induced inhibition of sympathetic nerve activity: no indication for a central presynaptic or an indirect sympathomimetic mode of action. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 286:97–111Google Scholar
  5. Haeusler G (1977) Neuronal mechanisms influencing transmission in the baroreceptor reflec arc. In: De Jong W, Provoost AP, Shapiro AP (eds) Hypertension and brain mechanisms. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 95–109Google Scholar
  6. Hamel EG, Jr, Kaelber WW (1961) Reserpine action on the central nervous system of the cat. Am J Physiol 200:195–200Google Scholar
  7. Heise A, Kroneberg G (1973) Central nervous α-adrenergic receptors and the mode of action of α-methyldopa. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 279:285–300Google Scholar
  8. Henning M, van Zwieten PA (1968) Central hypotensive effect of α-methyldopa. J Pharm Pharmacol 20:409–417Google Scholar
  9. Hoyer I, van Zwieten PA (1972) The central hypotensive action of amphetamine, ephedrine, phentermine, chlorphentermine and fenfluramine. J Pharm Pharmacol 24:452–458Google Scholar
  10. Kobinger W (1978) Central α-adrenergic systems as targets for hypotensive drugs. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol 81:39–100Google Scholar
  11. Kobinger W, Pichler L (1978) Differentiation of drugs acting centrally upon the cardiovascular system by means of sympathetic and vagal responses. Clin Exp Hyperten 1:229–249Google Scholar
  12. Koss MC (1979a) Topical clonidine produces mydriasis by a central nervous system action. Eur J Pharmacol 55:305–310Google Scholar
  13. Koss MC (1979b) Clonidine mydriasis in the cat: further evidence for a CNS postsynaptic action. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 309:235–239Google Scholar
  14. Koss MC (1980) Studies on the mechanism of amphetamine mydriasis in the cat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 213:49–53Google Scholar
  15. Koss MC, Christensen HD (1979) Evidence for a central postsynaptic action of clonidine. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 307:45–50Google Scholar
  16. Koss MC, San LC (1976) Analysis of clonidine-induced mydriasis. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci 15:566–570Google Scholar
  17. Nisida I, Okada H (1959) On the role of the pupillo-constrictory centers in the adrenalin-mydriasis and-miosis. Joa J Physiol 9:348–358Google Scholar
  18. Schmitt H, Schmitt H (1970) Interactions between 2-(2,6-dichlorophenylamino)-2-imidazole hydrochloride (St 155, Catapresan) and α-adrenergic blocking drugs. Eur J Pharmacol 9:7–13Google Scholar
  19. Schmitt H, Schmitt H, Fenard S (1971) Evidence for an α-sympathomimetic component in the effects of catapresan on vasomotor centres: antagonism by piperoxane. Eur J Pharmacol 14:98–100Google Scholar
  20. Schmitt H, Schmitt H, Fenard S (1973) Action of α-adrenergic blocking drugs on the sympathetic centres and their interactions with the central sympatho-inhibitory effect of clonidine. Arzneim Forsch 23:40–45Google Scholar
  21. Sharpe LG, Pickworth WB, Martin WR (1977) Actions of amphetamine and antagonists on pupil diameter in the chronic sympathectomized dog. Psychopharmacology 53:115–120Google Scholar
  22. Sigg EB, Sigg TD (1967) Adrenergic modulation of central function. In: Garattini S, Dukes MNG (eds). Antidepressant drugs Exerpta Med, Amsterdam, pp 172–178Google Scholar
  23. Torchiana ML, Lotti VJ, Clark CM, Stone CA (1973) Comparison of centrally mediated hypotensive action of methyldopa and DOPA in cats. Arch Int Pharmacodyn 205:103–113Google Scholar
  24. Ury B, Gellhorn E (1939) Role of the sympathetic system in reflex dilatation of pupil. J Neurophysiol 2:268–275Google Scholar
  25. Yonkman FF, Stilwell D, Jeremias R (1944) The adrenolytic and sympatholitic actions of yohimbine and ethyl yohimbine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 81:111–115Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. C. Koss
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Pharmacology and of OphthalmologyUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, and Dean McGee Eye InstituteOklahoma CityUSA

Personalised recommendations