Skip to main content
Log in

Hermeneutics as an approach to science: Part II

  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper continues the hermeneutic-phenomenological investigation of natural science, in which understanding plays a role comparable to creative construction (see ‘Hermeneutics as an Approach to Science: Part I’ in Science & Education 2(1)). The first issue treated is that of language: Is the language of science part of the equipment of the scientist, the subject, or part of the object itself — nature already linguistically encased? This issue, arising from the so-called argument of ‘the double hermeneutic’, relates the general question of the role of the subject in natural science to the role of interpretation. Examples of major interpretative developments in physics are discussed. The inquiry suggests that the role of interpretation and hermeneutics is tied to the educative or ‘study-mode’ of science; and that this mode can, apparently, be found at all levels and stages of science. The nature of this interpretive mode, and its relation to the creative mode, is then analyzed on the model of Gadamer's description of the interpretation of art.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apel, K. O.: 1968, ‘Perspectives for a General Hermeneutic Theory’, in The Hermeneutic Reader, pp. 320–345. See Mueller-Vollmer 1988.

  • Bevilacqua, F.: 1983, “Textbooks' Physics Versus History of Physics: The Case of Classical Electromagnetic Theory”, in The Principle of Conservation of Energy and the History of Classical Electromagnetic Theory, La Golliardica Pavese, Pavia, pp. 1–34, 231–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevilacqua, F: 1984, ‘H. Hertz's Experiments and the Shift Towards Contiguous Propagation in the Early Nineties’, Rev. Stor. Sci. 1, 239–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevilacqua, F.: 1986, ‘“Enchantment” and the Post Industrial Society’, in P. Thomsen (ed.), Science Education and the History of Physics, Physics Dept., University of Aarhus, Aarhus, pp. 42–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, R. J.: 1983, Beyond Objectivism & Relativism, Univ. of Pennsylvania Press., Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D.: 1965, The Special Theory of Relativity, W.A. Benjamin, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondi, H.: 1964, Relativity and Common Sense: A New Approach to Einstein, Doubleday, Garden City, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, E.: 1953, The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, Yale Univ. Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champagne, A. B., E. K. Leopold, and J.H. Anderson: 1980, ‘Factors Influencing the Learning of Classical Mechanics’, Amer. J. Physics 48, 1047–1079.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. M.: 1981, ‘Stages in the Empirical Programme of Relativism’, Social Studies of Science 11, 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, J. M., and T. Keutner (eds.): 1988, Hermeneutics Versus Science, Univ. of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallmayr, F. R., and T. A. McCarthy (eds.): 1977, Understanding and Social Inquiry, Univ. of Notre Dame press, Notre Dame, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirac, P. A. M.: 1933, ‘On the Lagrangian in Quantum Mechanics’, Physikalische Zeitschrift der Sovietunion, 3, p. 64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirac, P. A. M.: 1958 [1930], The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 4th ed., The Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H.: 1985, ‘Holism and Hermeneutics’, in Hermeneutics and Praxis, pp. 227–247. See Hollinger (1985).

  • Dreyfus, H.: 1991 Being in the World: A Commentary on Heidegger's Being and Time, Division I, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eger, M.: 1992, ‘Hermeneutics in Science Education’, Science & Education 1, 337–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eger, M: 1993, ‘Hermeneutics as an Approach to Science: Part I’, Science and Education 2, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein A.: 1949, ‘Autobiographical Notes’, in P. A. Schilpp (ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, Harper Torchbooks, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A., Lorentz, H. A., Weyl, H., and Minkowski, H.: 1952, The Principle of Relativity: A Collection of Original Papers on the Special and General Theory of Relativity, tr. W. Perrett and G. B. Jeffery, Dover, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlichson, H.: 1973, ‘The Rod Contraction-Clock Retardation Ether Theory and the Special Theory of Relativity’, Amer. J. Phys. 41, 1068–1077.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feynman, R. P.: 1948, ‘Space-Time Approach to Non-Relativistic Quantum Mechanics’, Rev. Modern Physics 20, 367–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feynman, R. P.: 1966, ‘The Development of the Space-Time View of Quantum Electrodynamics’ (Nobel lecture), Physics Today, August, 31–44.

  • Gadamer, H. G.: 1975 [1960], Truth and Method, (Tr. G. Barden & J. Cumming, from the 2nd [1965] ed.), Crossroads, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H. G.: 1976 [1966], Philosophical Hermeneutics, Univ. of Calif. Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H. G.: 1988 [1959], ‘On the Circle of Understanding’, in Hermeneutics Versus Science?, pp. 68–78. See Connolly and Keutner (1988).

  • Galison, P.: 1987, How Experiments End, The Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell-Mann, M.: 1989, ‘Dick Feynman, the Guy in the Office Down the Hall’, Physics Today, February, 50–54.

  • Gleick, J.: 1992, Genius: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman, Pantheon, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, B.: 1988, Inventing Reality: Physics as Language, John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J.: 1984 [1981], The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1 (tr. T. McCarthy), Beacon Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I.: 1983, Representing and Intervening, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heelan, P. A.: 1977, ‘Hermeneutics of Experimental Science in the Context of the Life-World’, in Interdisciplinary Phenomenology, pp. 7–50. See Ihde and Zaner (1977).

  • Heelan, P. A.: 1983, Space Perception and the Philosophy of Science, Univ. of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heelan, P. A.: 1988, ‘A Heideggerian Meditation on Science and Art’ in Hermeneutic Phenomenology, pp. 257–75. See Kockelmans (1988).

  • Heelan, P. A.: 1991, ‘Hermeneutical Phenomenology and the Philosophy of Science’ in Gadamer and Hermeneutics, pp. 213–228. See Siverman (1991).

  • Herget, D. E. (ed.): 1989, The History and Philosophy of Science in Science teaching (Proceedings of the First International Conference), Science Education and Department of Philosophy, Florida State University, Tallahassee Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertz, H.: 1956 [1894], The Principles of Mechanics Presented in a New Form, Dover, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, M. B.: 1980, Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science, Harvester Press, Brighton, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, M. B.: 1988, ‘Socializing Epistemology’, in Construction and Constraint, pp. 97–122. See McMullin (1988).

  • Hollinger, R. (ed.): 1985, Hermeneutics and Praxis, Univ. of Note Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton, G.: 1960, ‘Origins of the Special Theory of Relativity’, Amer. J. Phys. 28, pp. 627–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E.: 1962 [1913], Ideas: A General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology (tr. W. R. Boyce Gibson), Collier-McMillan Ldt., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E.: 1970 [1936], The Crisis of the European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, Northwestern Univ. Press, Evanston, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihde, D.: 1991, Instrumental Realism: The Interface Between Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Technology, Indiana Univ. Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihde, D. and R. M. Zaner (eds.): 1977, Interdisciplinary Phenomenology, Nijhoff, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingarden, R.: 1973 [1937], The Cognition of the Literary work of Art (tr. from the German by R. A. Crowley and K. R. Olson), Northwestern University Press, Evanston, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingarden, R.: 1989 [1961], Ontology of the Work of Art, (tr. R. Meyer with J. T. Goldthwait), Ohio Univ. Press, Athens, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kockelmans, J. J.: 1988, Hermeneutic Phenomenology: Lectures and Essays, University Press of America, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S.: 1970 [1962], The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Second ed., Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B.: 1987, Science in Action, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorentz, H. A.: 1904, ‘Electromagnetic Phenomena in a System Moving With Any Velocity Less Than That of Light’, in The Principle of Relativity, pp. 11–34. See Einstein et al. (1952).

  • McMullin E. (ed.): 1988, Construction and Constraint, Univ. of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M.: 1962, The Phenomenology of Perception (tr. Colin Smith), Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minkowski, H.: 1908, ‘Space and Time’, in The Principle of Relativity, pp. 75–91. See Einstein et al. (1952).

  • Mueller-Vollmer, K. (ed.): 1988, The Hermeneutic Reader, Continuum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pais, A.: 1982, Subtle is the Lord: The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, R. and W. Rindler: 1965, ‘Energy Conservation as the Basis of Relativistic mechanics’, Amer. J. Phys. 33, 55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M.: 1958, Personal Knowledge, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R.: 1972, Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, J.: 1987, Knowledge and Power: Toward a Political Philosophy of Science, Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilk, J. M., S. E. Driscoll, and C. S. Carter: 1989, ‘Problem Solving and Construction of Scientific Knowledge: A case Study in Epistemology’, in The History and Philosophy of Science in Science Teaching, pp. 322–331. See Herget (1989).

  • Schwinger, J.: 1989, ‘A Path to Quantum Electrodynamics’, Physics Today, February, 42–48.

  • Schweber, S. S.: 1986, ‘Feynman and the Visualization of Space-Time Processes’, Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 449–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, H. J. (ed.): 1991, Gadamer and Hermeneutics, Routledge, New York and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C.: 1971, ‘Interpretation and the Sciences of Man’, in Understanding and Social Inquiry, pp. 101–131. See Dallmayr and McCarthy (1977).

  • Weinstock, R.: 1965, ‘New Approach to Special Relativity, Amer. J. Phys. 33, 640–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker E., Sir: 1910, A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity: From the Age of Descartes to the Close of the Nineteenth Century, Longmans, Green & Co., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. P.: 1965, Michael Faraday, Da Capo Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Research for this paper was carried out, in part, under a CUNY Scholar Incentive Award. A version of the paper was read to the Philosophy Department, University of Auckland, in October 1992.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eger, M. Hermeneutics as an approach to science: Part II. Sci Educ 2, 303–328 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00488169

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00488169

Keywords

Navigation