Skip to main content
Log in

Nachweis- und Bestimmungsgrenze beim direkt potentiometrischen Arbeiten mit ionensensitiven Elektroden

Limit of detection and limit of determination using ionsensitive electrodes and direct potentiometry

  • Originalarbeiten
  • Ionenselektive Elektroden
  • Published:
Fresenius' Zeitschrift für analytische Chemie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Calibration of ion-sensitive electrodes using nonlinear regression analysis is combined with an increase of the working range to lower concentrations. It is possible to have statistically reliable results lower than the so-called limit of determination according to IUPAC. From these items the critical level, the limit of detection and the limit of determination are derived by the calibration function, its inverse (the function of analysis) and the confidence interval. The limit of detection is defined by the smallest detectable signal and the calibration function. The limit of determination is defined by the smallest concentration of an analysis that will be statistically significant with a preset probability of error differentiated from the concentration zero and the blind value of the potentiometric measurement. The limit of determination is therefore the smallest concentration of analysis that may be quantitatively determined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  1. Becht U (1985) Dissertation Würzburg

  2. Becht U, Ebel S, Reyer B (1984) Fresenius Z Anal Chem 319:371–375

    Google Scholar 

  3. Camman K (1973) Das Arbeiten mit ionensensitiven Elektroden. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. DIN (1985) Norm-Entwurf 38402 Teil 43

  5. Ebel S (1987) parat-Jahrbuch Chemielabor. VCH Verlagsgesellschaft, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ebel S, Becht U (1986) Fresenius Z Anal Chem 323:359–363

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ebel S, Becht U (1987) Fresenius Z Anal Chem 327:157–164

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ebel S, Kamm U (1983) Fresenius Z Anal Chem 316:382–385

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ebel S, Kamm U (1984) Fresenius Z Anal Chem 318:293–294

    Google Scholar 

  10. Efstathiou CE (1983) Anal Chim Acta 154:41–49

    Google Scholar 

  11. Funk W, Dammann V, Vonderheid C, Oehlmann G (1982) Forschungsbericht 102 05 114. Umweltbundesamt Berlin

  12. IUPAC Recommendations for ion-selective electrodes (1976) Pure Appl Chem 48:129–132

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kaiser H (1965) Fresenius Z Anal Chem 209:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kaiser H (1966) Fresenius Z Anal Chem 216:80–93

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kamo N, Hazemoto N, Kobatake (1977) Talanta 24:111

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kamo N, Kobatake Y, Tsuda K (1980) Talanta 27:205–208

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liteanu C, Hopirtean E, Popescu C (1976) Anal Chem 48:2013–2019

    Google Scholar 

  18. Midgley D (1979) Analyst 104:248–257

    Google Scholar 

  19. Midgley D (1980) Analyst 105:1002–1005

    Google Scholar 

  20. Moody GJ, Thomas JDR (1971) Selective ion-sensitive electrodes. Warford, Merrow

    Google Scholar 

  21. Roos JB (1962) Analyst 87:832–833

    Google Scholar 

  22. Simeonov V (1984) Fresenius Z Anal Chem 319:376–378

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wilson AL (1973) Talanta 20:725–732

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ebel, S., Becht, U. Nachweis- und Bestimmungsgrenze beim direkt potentiometrischen Arbeiten mit ionensensitiven Elektroden. Z. Anal. Chem. 329, 7–11 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00487532

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00487532

Navigation